Comparative Investigation of Compression and Energy Absorption Performance of Modified Re-Entrant Auxetic Structures
Abstract
In this study, the collision behaviors of three different auxetic unit cell designs (diagonal re-entrant, split re-entrant, and arrowhead re-entrant) with negative Poisson's ratios used in energy absorption and available in the literature were investigated. A new model was designed inspired by the re-entrant model and the rib model. The models were subjected to quasi-static compression tests using computer-aided engineering simulations, and ABS and PETG materials, commonly used in additive manufacturing, were used in these tests. Each model was modeled as a 100x100x20 mm lattice structure consisting of 4x4 unit cells. In the analyses, the element size was set to 1 mm using mesh convergence. According to the results obtained in the study, the split re-entrant model achieved the highest maximum force value among all materials, while the arrowhead re-entrant model exhibited the lowest maximum force value. The new design re-entrant rib model exhibited a more balanced performance compared to other models. When evaluated on a material basis, ABS exhibited more stability, while PETG stood out in terms of impact resistance and displacement capacity. In this context, the superior performance of the new model in comparison with other models in analyses conducted with different materials demonstrated the advantages of the new designs over standard models.
Keywords
References
- [1] Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science. 1987;235(4792):1038-1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.1038
- [2] Gibson LJ. Cellular solids. MRS Bull. 2003;28:270-274. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2003.79
- [3] Ren X, et al. Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review. Smart Mater Struct. 2018;27:023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c
- [4] Chen G, Cheng Y, Zhang P, Liu J, Chen C, Cai S. Design and modelling of auxetic double arrowhead honeycomb core sandwich panels for performance improvement under air blast loading. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2020;23(8):3574-3605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636220935563
- [5] Park JJ, Won P, Ko SH. A review on hierarchical origami and kirigami structure for engineering applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol. 2019;6:147-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00027-2
- [6] Grima J, Alderson A, Evans K. Auxetic behavior from rotating rigid units. Phys Status Solidi B. 2005;242:561-575. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200460376
- [7] Hu Q, Lu G, Tse KM. Compressive and tensile behaviors of 3D hybrid auxetic-honeycomb lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2024;263:108767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108767
- [8] Ikram H, Al Rashid A, Koç M. Additive manufacturing of smart polymeric composites: literature review and future perspectives. Polym Compos. 2022;43(9):6355-6380. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26948
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Automotive Engineering Materials
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ali Rıza Yıldız
0000-0003-1790-6987
Türkiye
Publication Date
March 4, 2026
Submission Date
November 7, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 13, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 1
