Research Article

Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 30, 2020
EN

Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances

Abstract

Determining the borders of the objects in the images and detection of the edges is an important step for image processing applications. In this study, the areas of different objects were calculated using edge detection methods. The edges of real-time images taken from the camera were detected with traditionally used Sobel, Prewitt and Canny filters. In addition, these filters were applied to the images obtained using Basic Global Thresholding (BGT) pre-processing and Mean Thresholding (MT) pre-processing to detect the edges in the image. After eliminating the fake edges in the edge images, the areas of the obtained images were calculated. The methods used in this paper were compared according to the fake edge and the area calculation performances.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Sobel, I. (1970). Camera Models and Perception. Ph.D. the-sis, Stanford University, CA.
  2. [2] Prewitt, J. (1970). Object Enhancemet and Extraction. Pic-ture Processing and Psychopictorics, NY, Academic Pres.
  3. [3] Canny, J. (1986). A Computational Approach to Edge Detec-tion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8, 679-700.
  4. [4] Jin, S., Li, X., Yang, X., Zhang, J. A., and Shen, D. (2019). Identification of Tropical Cyclone Centers in SAR Imagery Based on Template Matching and Particle Swarm Optimiza-tion Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Re-mote Sensing, 57(1), 598-608.
  5. [5] Rafati, M., Arabfard, M., Zadeh, M. R. R., and Maghsoud-loo, M. (2016). Assessment of noise reduction in ultrasound images of common carotid and brachial arteries. IET Com-puter Vision, 10(1), 1-8.
  6. [6] Kalra, A., and Chhokar, R. L. (2016, September). A Hybrid approach using sobel and canny operator for digital image edge detection. In: 2016 International Conference on Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE), pp. 305-310.
  7. [7] Guiming, S., and Jidong, S. (2016, June). Remote sensing image edge-detection based on improved Canny operator. In: 2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), pp. 652-656.
  8. [8] Ye, H., Shen, B., and Yan, S. (2018, October). Prewitt edge detection based on BM3D image denoising. In: 2018 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Au-tomation Control Conference (IAEAC), pp. 1593-1597.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2020

Submission Date

April 24, 2020

Acceptance Date

July 10, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Güngör, M. A., & Polat, S. (2020). Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 4(3), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..726332
AMA
1.Güngör MA, Polat S. Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances. IJASTECH. 2020;4(3):132-137. doi:10.30939/ijastech.726332
Chicago
Güngör, Murat Alparslan, and Seyfi Polat. 2020. “Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 4 (3): 132-37. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 726332.
EndNote
Güngör MA, Polat S (September 1, 2020) Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 4 3 132–137.
IEEE
[1]M. A. Güngör and S. Polat, “Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances”, IJASTECH, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 132–137, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.30939/ijastech..726332.
ISNAD
Güngör, Murat Alparslan - Polat, Seyfi. “Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 4/3 (September 1, 2020): 132-137. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 726332.
JAMA
1.Güngör MA, Polat S. Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances. IJASTECH. 2020;4:132–137.
MLA
Güngör, Murat Alparslan, and Seyfi Polat. “Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 132-7, doi:10.30939/ijastech. 726332.
Vancouver
1.Murat Alparslan Güngör, Seyfi Polat. Comparison of the Edge Detection Methods According to Fake Edge and Area Calculation Performances. IJASTECH. 2020 Sep. 1;4(3):132-7. doi:10.30939/ijastech. 726332

Cited By


International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology (IJASTECH) is published by Society of Automotive Engineers Turkey

by.png