Performance Comparison of Propylene Glycol-Water and Ethylene Glycol-Water Mixtures as Engine Coolants in a Flat-Tube Automobile Radiator

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 147 - 156, 30.06.2021

Ahmet Gündem , Murat Hoşöz , Erkan Keklik

https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..914901

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating and comparing the thermal performance of five different engine coolants employed in an experimental engine cooling system with a flat-tube louvered-fin automobile radiator. For this purpose, a PLC-controlled test system was set up. The system could maintain the temperatures of the air and coolant at the radiator inlet, the speed of the air and flow rate of the coolant at the required values during the tests. The tested coolants were pure wa-ter, 30/70 ethylene glycol (EG)/water, 30/70 propylene glycol (PG)/water, 50/50 EG/water and 50/50 PG/water mixtures. In all tests, the coolant temperature at the radiator inlet was kept at 90°C, while the coolant flow rate was varied between 0.10–0.25 l/s with 0.05 l/s increments. Furthermore, the air temperature at the ra-diator inlet was kept at 25, 30 and 35°C, and the air speed passing over the radia-tor was varied between 1–4 m/s with 1 m/s increments. The thermal performance of the radiator was evaluated by locating the measured coolant flow rate and coolant inlet/outlet temperatures into the conservation of energy equation. It was found that water yielded the highest radiator heat rejection rates. Compared with water, 30/70 EG/water, 50/50 EG/water, 30/70 PG/water, 50/50 PG/water mix-tures yielded on average 3.50%, 7.89%, 8.28%, 11.46% lower radiator heat rejec-tion rates, respectively. Since PG has some advantages over EG such as lower cost and toxicity, PG mixtures can be employed as antifreeze instead of EG mix-tures in expense of a slight decrease in the thermal performance.    

Keywords

Automobile, Coolant, Engine cooling, Ethylene glycol, Propylene glycol

References

• Rajput RK. Internal combustion engine. 2nd ed. India: Laxmi Publications Ltd.; 2007.
• Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc.; 1998.
• Subhedar DG, Ramani BM, Gupta A. Experimental investigation of heat transfer potential of Al2 O3/water-mono ethylene glycol nanofluids as a car radiator coolant. Case Stud in Therm Eng. 2018;11:26–34.
• Pérez-Tavernier J, Vallejo JP, Cabaleiro D, Fernández-Seara J, Lugo L. Heat transfer performance of a nano-enhanced propylene glycol:water mixture. Int J of Therm Sci. 2019;139:413–423.
• Sahoo RR, Ghosh P, Sarkar J. Energy and exergy comparisons of water based optimum brines as coolants for rectangular fin automotive radiator. Int J of Heat and Mass Transf. 2017;105:690–696.
• Gollin M, Bjork D. Comparative performance of ethylene glycol/water and propylene glycol/water coolants in automobile radiators. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1996.
• Soylu S, Atmaca İ, Asiltürk M, Doğan A. Improving heat transfer performance of an automobile radiator using Cu Ag doped TiO2 based nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;157.
• Kumar A, Hassan MA, Chand P. Heat transport in nanofluid coolant car radiator with louvered fins. Powder Technol. 2020;376:631–642.
• Rai P, Kumar A, Yadav Anshul. Experimental investigation of heat transfer augmentation in automobile radiator using magnesium oxide/distilled water-ethylene glycol based nanofluid. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;24:1525–32.
• Juniour LCC, Nogueira É. Influence of the coolant flow containing silver nanoparticles (Ag) from an aqueous solution based on ethylene glycol (EG50%) on the thermal-hydraulic performance of an automotive radiator. World J of Nano Sci and Eng. 2020;10:10–26.
• Sahoo RR, Ganosh P, Sarkar J. Performance comparison of various coolants for louvered fin tube automotive radiator. Therm Sci 2017;21(6B):2871–81.
• Habibian SH, Abolmaali AM, Afshin H. Numerical investigation of the effects of fin shape, antifreeze and nanoparticles on the performance of compact finned-tube heat exchangers for automobile radiator. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;133:248–260.
• Scott LF, Weir TW. Comparing the Performance of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol coolants in heavy duty vehicles. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1996.
• Juger JJ, Crook RF. Heat transfer performance of propylene glycol versus ethylene glycol coolant solutions in laboratory testing. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1999.
• Greaney JP, Brunner K, Coburn CR. Low temperature performance of propylene glycol engine coolant. SAE Transaction. 1995;104:803–11.
• Greaney JP, Cozzone GE. Comparative performance of aqueous propylene glycol and aqueous ethylene glycol coolants. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1999.
• Tijani AS, Sudirman AS. Thermos-physical properties and heat transfer characteristics of water/anti-freezing and Al2 O3/CuO based nanofluid as a coolant for car radiator. Int J of Heat and Mass Transf. 2018;18:48–57.
• Goudarzi K, Jamali H. Heat transfer enhancement of Al2 O3/EG in a car radiator with wire coil inserts. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;118:510–17.
• Elsaid AM. Experimental study on the heat transfer performance and friction factor characteristics ofCo3 O4 and Al2 O3based H2 O/(CH2 OH)2 nanofluids in a vehicle engine radiator. Int Commun Heat and Mass Transf. 2019;108.
• Ahmed SA, Ozkaymak M, Sözen A, Menlik T, Fahed A. Improving car radiator performance by using TiO2-water nanofluid. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2018; 67(11):22–38.
• Zhou X, Wang Y, Zheng K, Huang H. Comparison of heat transfer performance of ZnO–PG, α–Al2 O3–PG and γ–Al2 O3–PG nanofluids in car radiator. Nanomater Nanotechnol. 2019;9:1–12.
• Salamon V, Kumar DS, Thirumalini S. Experimental investigation of heat transfer characteristics of automobile radiator using TiO2-nanofluid coolant. IOP Conference Series. Mater Sci Eng 2017;225.
• Jagadishwar K, Sudhakar Babu S. Performance investigation of water and propylene glycol mixture based nano-fluids on automotive radiator for enhancement of heat transfer. Int J Mech Eng Technol 2017;8(7):822–33.
• Elsebay M, Elbadawy I, Shedid MH, Fatouh M. Numerical resizing study of Al2 O3 and CuO nanofluids in the flat tubes of a radiator. Appl Math. Model. 2016;40:6437–50.
• Ali HM, Ali H, Liaquat H, Maqsood HTB, Nadir MA. Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer augmentation for car radiator using ZnO-water nanofluids. Energy. 2015;84:317–24.
• Ramalingham S, Dhairiyasamy R, Govindasamy M, Muthaiah RJV. Consequence of nanoparticles size on heat transfer characteristics of a radiator. Powder Technol. 2020;367:213–24.
• Keklik E, Hoşöz M. Experimental heat transfer performance of a louvered-fin and flat-tube automotive radiator for various engine coolants, International Conference on Innovative Engineering Applications, 20-22 September 2018, Sivas, Turkey, 278–285.
• Keklik E, Hoşöz M. Comparison of the experimental performance of round and flat tube automobile radiators for various coolants, J of Polytec 2020;23(4): 1121–30.
• Klein SA. EES: Engineering Equation Solver. Version 10.167. F-Chart Software.