Efficiency Analysis of Various Batteries with Real-time Data on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 214 - 223, 30.09.2021

Yunus Emre Ekici , İsmail Can Dikmen , Mustafa Nurmuhammed , Teoman Karadağ

https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..946047

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Battery selection remains an up-to-date engineering problem for hybrid and electric vehicle manufacturers. Type of battery and its capacity will depend on the trip and vehicle parameters. An electric vehicle produced with the ideal bat-tery type will undoubtedly be preferred by customers. Data collected from black boxes of trolleybuses operated by Malatya Metropolitan Municipality were used in this study. The real road and driver characteristics were included in the study with the experimentally obtained data. These data are the accelerator pedal data obtained from vehicles driven by different drivers in regular and congested traf-fic hours. In this study, four different battery chemistries were run separately on a hybrid vehicle model and analyzed. Chosen battery chemistries are the most commonly used by manufacturers. These are Lead Acid, Nickel Cadmium, Nickel Metal Hydride and Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries. The results of the study are presented in detail comparatively. Among the battery chemistries, Lithium iron phosphate is observed to be the most ideal battery type for hybrid electric vehi-cles.

Keywords

electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, batteries, battery management system.

Supporting Institution

Inonu University

Project Number

FOA-2018-1358

Thanks

This study was supported by Research Fund of the Inonu University. Project Number: FOA-2018-1358

References

• [1] D. Anseán, M. González, V. M. García, J. C. Viera, J. C. Antón, and C. Blanco, “Evaluation of LiFePO4 Batteries for Electric Vehicle Applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1855–1863, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2014.2344446.
• [2] A. Khaligh and Z. Li, “Battery, ultracapacitor, fuel cell, and hybrid energy storage systems for electric, hybrid electric, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: State of the art,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2806–2814, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2010.2047877.
• [3] J. Oncken and B. Chen, “Real-Time Model Predictive Powertrain Control for a Connected Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 8420–8432, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3000471.
• [4] X. Chen, W. Shen, T. T. Vo, Z. Cao, and A. Kapoor, “An overview of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles,” 10th Int. Power Energy Conf. IPEC 2012, pp. 230–235, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ASSCC.2012.6523269.
• [5] B. Scrosati and J. Garche, “Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future,” J. Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 9, pp. 2419–2430, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048.
• [6] M. Amrhein and P. T. Krein, “Dynamic simulation for analysis of hybrid electric vehicle system and subsystem interactions, including power electronics,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 825–836, 2005, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2005.847231.
• [7] M. Ducusin, S. Gargies, and C. Mi, “Modeling of a series hybrid electric high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 557–565, 2007, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2006.889575.
• [8] R. Ghorbani, E. Bibeau, and S. Filizadeh, “On conversion of hybrid electric vehicles to plug-in,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 2016–2020, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2010.2041563.
• [9] J. M. Tyrus, R. M. Long, M. Kramskaya, Y. Fertman, and A. Emadi, “Hybrid electric sport utility vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1607–1622, 2004, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2004.832418.