Başarılı Uzaktan Eğitim Modellerini İçeren Araştırmaların Detaylı İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, başarılı olan uzaktan eğitim modellerinin Web of Science veritabanında belirli kriterlere göre tarama yapılarak analiz edilmesidir. Web of Science veritabanında “successful models of distance education” ve “successful distance education models” kelimeleri ile tarama yapılarak 64 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Tarih olarak 2000-2023 arası, doküman olarak makale, dil olarak İngilizce, kategori olarak eğitim, indeks olarak SSCI-Social Sciences Citation, ESCI-Emerging Sources Citation ve SCI-E-Science Citation Expanded ve açık erişimli makaleler dikkate alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak 22 makale incelemeye alınmıştır. Araştırma yöntemi olarak nicel araştırma modeli ve tarama araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Her bir makale, yayınlandığı indeksler, makalenin amacı, yıllara göre yayın, problem durumu, yazarların ülkesi ve uzaktan eğitim uygulanan hedef kitle olacak şekilde beş alt-başlık çerçevesinde derinlemesine incelenmiştir. 2020 yılına kadar yayımlanan makalelerin problem durumu, eğitim eksikliğinden kaynaklanan belirli bir durumu çözmek için uzaktan eğitim kullanıldığını, 2021-2023 yılları arasında yayımlanan makalelerde ise problem durumu olarak COVID-19 salgınının ön plana çıktığı anlaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• başarılı uzaktan eğitim modelleri
• başarılı çevrimiçi modeller
• uzaktan eğitim literatür taraması

Detailed Review of Research Containing Successful Distance Education Models

Abstract

The aim is to analyze successful distance education models by scanning Web of Science database. Web of Science database with the words "successful models of distance education" and "successful distance education models". Dates 2000-2023, articles as documents, English as languages, education as categories SSCI, ESCI and SCI-E, open access articles as indexes were taken into consideration. As a result, 22 articles were examined. Quantitative research model was used as the research model. Each article was examined in depth within the framework of five sub-headings: the indexes in which it was published, the purpose of the article, publication by year, problem situation, the country of the authors and the target audience. It was understood that the problem situation of the articles published until 2020 was that distance education was used to solve a certain situation caused by lack of education. It was determined that the problem situation was COVID-19 in 2021-2023.

Keywords

• successful models of distance education
• successful online models
• literature review of distance education

References

1. Andrade, M. S. (2014). Dialogue and Structure: enabling learner self-regulation in technology-enhanced learning environments. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.563
2. Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (Cagiltay). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management learning, (","), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602333003
3. Archer, E., Chetty, Y. B., & Prinsloo, P. (2014). Benchmarking the Habits and Behaviours of Successful Students: A Case Study of Academic-Business Collaboration [Article]. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 22. ://WOS:000342405800005
4. Arghode, V., Brieger, E. W., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Adult learning theories: implications for online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(7), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-02-2017-0014
5. Armsey, J. W., & Dahl, N. C. (1973). An Inquiry Into the Uses of Instructional Technology.
6. Aydın, C. H. (2005). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede kullanılan basılı materyallerdeki anlatım biçimine ilişkin öğrenen tercihleri. https://hdl.handle.net/11421/460
7. Buckley, K., Fairman, K., Pogge, E., & Raney, E. (2022). Use of Learning Management System Data to Predict Student Success in a Pharmacy Capstone Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(4), 280-285, Article 8594. ://WOS:000800657600007
8. Cagiltay, K. (2002). A design/development model for building electronic performance support systems [Ph.D., Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Ann Arbor. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/design-development-model-building-electronic/docview/305510447/se-2?accountid=25248

9. Carapeto, C., & Barros, D. M. V. (2019). Nutrition and health as virtual class at Open University (Portugal): pedagogical strategies for higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0151-4
10. Drew, J. C., Galindo-Gonzalez, S., Ardissone, A. N., & Triplett, E. W. (2016). Broadening Participation of Women and Underrepresented Minorities in STEM through a Hybrid Online Transfer Program. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 15(3), Article ar50. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0065
11. Driscoll, M. (2000). Introduction to theories of learning and instruction. Psychology of learning for instruction, 3-28.
12. Driscoll, M. P., & Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction.
13. Duran, N., Önal, A., & Kurtuluş, C. (2006). E-öğrenme ve Kurumsal Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşim Öğrenim Yönetim Sistemleri.
14. Fensie, A., Pierre, T. S., Jain, J., & Sezen-Barrie, A. (2023). Engaged learning during distraction: a case study of successful working moms in distance education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09359-0
15. Fernandes, R., Lima, J. T. D., da Silva, B. H., Sales, M. J. T., & de Orange, F. A. (2020). Development, implementation and evaluation of a management specialization course in oncology using blended learning. Bmc Medical Education, 20(1), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1957-4
16. Hilliam, R., & Williams, G. (2019). Academic and pastoral teams working in partnership to support distance learning students according to curriculum area. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1606674
17. Howard, W., Perrotte, G., Lee, M., & Frisone, J. (2017). A Formative Case Evaluation for the Design of an Online Delivery Model Providing Access to Study Abroad Activities. Online Learning, 21(3), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1234
18. Knezevich, S. J., & Eye, G. G. (1970). Instructional Technology and the School Administrator. Final Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED044789
19. Koutsouris, G., Norwich, B., Fujita, T., Ralph, T., Adlam, A., & Milton, F. (2017). Piloting a dispersed and inter-professional Lesson Study using technology to link team members at a distance. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 26(5), 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2017.1364290
20. Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J Comput High Educ, 34(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2
21. Marchak, D., Shvarts-Serebro, I., & Blonder, R. (2021). Teaching Chemistry by a Creative Approach: Adapting a Teachers' Course for Active Remote Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2809-2819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01341
22. Mashile, E. O., Fynn, A., & Matoane, M. (2020). Institutional Barriers To Learning In The South African Open Distance Learning Context. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3662
23. Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
24. McIsaac, M. (2002). The Internet, culture and community building. Advencing Online Learning In Asia, Hong Kong: The Open University of Hong Kong, 16-25.
25. Menabo, L., Skrzypiec, G., Sansavini, A., Brighi, A., & Guarini, A. (2022). Distance Education among Italian Teachers: Differences and Experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9263-9292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11008-5
26. Moore, M. G. (1990). Contemporary issues in American distance education. Pergamon.
27. Murray, M. H. (2011). Creating global networks through an online engineering graduate programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.541555
28. Needham, G., Nurse, R., Parker, J., Scantlebury, N., & Dick, S. (2013). Can an excellent distance learning library service support student retention and how can we find out? Open Learning, 28(2), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.847364
29. Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M., & Osial, M. (2021). A Worldwide Journey through Distance Education—From the Post Office to Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities, and Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118
30. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 425-453.
31. Reigeluth, C. M., & Moore, J. (1999). Cognitive education and the cognitive domain. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 51-68.
32. Reinhart, A., Malzkorn, B., Doing, C., Beyer, I., Junger, J., & Bosse, H. M. (2021). Undergraduate medical education amid COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of enablers and barriers to acquiring competencies in distant learning using focus groups. Medical Education Online, 26(1), Article 1940765. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1940765
33. Reiser, R. A. (2007). What field did you say you were in. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, 2-9. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/1/3/2/0132563584.pdf
34. Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2018). Technological Innovations in Large-Scale Teaching: Five Roots of Massive Open Online Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 623-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117727597
35. Segbenya, M., & MensahMinadzi, V. (2023). Post-Covid Lockdown Assessment of Blended Learning Approach for Distance Education in Ghana: implications for human resource managers and curriculum implementers. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 7955-7973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11516-4
36. Sherman, T. M., & Kurshan, B. L. (2005). Constructing learning: Using technology to support teaching for understanding. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(5), 10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ697302
37. Silber, K. H., & Foshay, W. R. (2006). Designing instructional strategies: A cognitive perspective. Handbook of human performance technology, 3, 370-413.
38. Smart, D., Ross, K., Carollo, S., & Williams-Gilbert, W. (2020). Contextualizing Instructional Technology to the Demands of Nursing Education. Comput Inform Nurs, 38(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000565
39. Stone, G., & Collins, E. (2012). Library impact data project phase II: The data strikes back. Taking Stock, 21(1), 6-7. https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/13536/2/Library_Impact_Data_Project_Phase_II.pdf
40. Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
41. Tamsah, H., Yusriadi, Y., Hasbi, H., Haris, A., & Ajanil, B. (2023). Training Management on Training Effectiveness and Teaching Creativity in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Research International, 2023, Article 6588234. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6588234
42. Teixeira, A. M., Mota, J., Pinto, M. D. T., & Morgado, L. (2019). Can MOOCs close the Opportunity Gaps? The contribution of social inclusive pedagogical design. Revista Fuentes, 21(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2019.v21.i2.08
43. Torrato, J. B., Aguja, S. E., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Using Web Video Conferencing to Conduct a Program as a Proposed Model toward Teacher Leadership and Academic Vitality in the Philippines. Education Sciences, 11(11), Article 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110658
44. Trentin, G. (1997). Telematics and on‐line teacher training: the POLARIS project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00029.x
45. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (Buckley et al.). Socio-Emotional Characteristics Of Emergency Distance Teaching: A Mixed-Method Investigation In Greece. Journal of Information Technology Education-Research, 21, 53-73. https://doi.org/10.28945/4918
46. Ünsal, H. (Archer et al.). Web Destekli Eğitim, Elektronik Öğrenme Ve Web Destekli Öğretim Programlarindaki Çeşitli Ders Modelleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 375-388. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tebd/issue/26127/275223
47. Yildiz, O., Bal, A., & Gulsecen, S. (2015). Statistical and Clustering Based Rules Extraction Approaches for Fuzzy Model to Estimate Academic Performance in Distance Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1356a