Year 2025,
Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 140 - 146, 24.06.2025
Ayşenur Gürgen
,
Sibel Yıldız
,
Sabrina Palantı
Project Number
TUBITAK 1059B141801409
References
-
1. Dumarçay, S.; Iaych, K.; Lemor, A.; Gérardin, P. Int. Wood Prod. J. 2015, 6, 31-35.
-
2. Brocco, V.F.; Paes, J.B.; da Costa, L.G.; Brazolin, S.; Arantes, M.D.C. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2093-2099.
-
3. Shiny, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Mamatha, N.; Lingappa, B.. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol. 2019, 21, 347-356.
-
4. Hwang, W.J.; Kartal, S.N.; Yoshimura, T.; Imamura, Y. S. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science 2007, 63, 90-95.
-
5. EN, 47. Wood preservatives. Determination of the toxic values against larvae of Hylotrupes bajulus (Linnaeus) - (Laboratory method). 2005.
-
6. EN, 117, E. Wood preservatives. Determination of toxic values against Reticulitermes species (European termites) (Laboratory method). 2013.
-
7.EN, 113. Wood preservatives. Test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes – Determination of the toxic values. 2006.
-
8. Colby, S. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 1967, 15, 20-22.
-
9. Chiappini, E.; Molinari, P.; Busconi, M.; Callegari, M.; Fogher, C.; Bani, P.. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored product protection, 2010, 97-103.
-
10. Robinson, W.; Cannon, K. Melsheimer Entomol. Ser. 1981.
-
11. Yalçın, M.; Taşçıoğlu, C.; Plarre, R.; Akçay, Ç.; Busweıler, S. Kastamonu Univ. J. For. 2018, 18, 83-91.
-
12. Baker, J. The insecticidal action of some components of wood preservatives. Pestic. Sci. 1972, 3, 229-239.
-
13. Clément, J.-L.; Bagnères, A.-G.; Uva, P.; Wilfert, L.; Quintana, A.; Reinhard, J.; Dronnet, S. Insectes Soc. 2001, 48, 202-215.
-
14. Smythe, R.V.; Carter, F.L.; Baxter, C.C. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1971, 64, 59-62.
-
15. Nagnan, P.; Clement, J. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990, 18, 13-16.
-
16. Bultman, J.D.; Beal, R.H.; Ampong, F.F. For. Prod. J. 1979, 6, 46-51.
-
17. Peralta, R.C.G.; Menezes, E.B.; Carvalho, A.G.; Aguiar-Menezes, E.d.L. Rev. Árvore 2004, 28, 283-289.
-
18. França, T.S.F.A.; França, F.J.N.; Arango, R.A.; Woodward, B.M.; Arantes, M.D.C. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2016, 107, 88-91.
-
19. Clausen, C.A.; Kartal, S.N.; Arango, R.A.; Green, F. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1-5.
-
20. Bak, M.; Németh, R. BioResources 2018, 13, 7886-7899.
-
21. Mankowski, M.; Morrell, J.J. Wood Fiber Sci. 2000, 32.
-
22. Stanojevic, D.; Comic, L.; Stefanovic, O.; Solujic-Sukdolak, S. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 15, 307-311.
-
23. Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shao, A. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 193.
-
24. Hussain, A.; Alajmi, M.F.; Khan, M.A.; Pervez, S.A.; Ahmed, F.; Amir, S.; Husain, F.M.; Khan, M.S.; Shaik, G.M.; Hassan, I. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 8.
-
25. Jin, T.; He, Y. Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 6877-6885.
-
26. Arroyo, B.J.; Bezerra, A.C.; Oliveira, L.L.; Arroyo, S.J.; de Melo, E.A.; Santos, A.M.P. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125566.
Determination of Biological Activities of Wood Samples Impregnated with Multi-Functional Compounds and Synergistic Effect Analysis Based on Fungal Resistance
Year 2025,
Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 140 - 146, 24.06.2025
Ayşenur Gürgen
,
Sibel Yıldız
,
Sabrina Palantı
Abstract
In this study, the biological resistance of Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus orientalis) wood samples which impregnated with individual and combinations of multi-functional compounds. Artificial antioxidant (A), GRAS compounds (G) and nano-SiO2 (N) were chosen as multi-functional compounds. Firstly, the wood samples were impregnated single, binary and ternary combinations of impregnation solutions. Larvicidial resistance of pine samples was investigated against to Hylotrupes bajulus. Termitidicial resistance of all samples were determined using Subterranean termites Reticulitermes. Also, Gloeophyllum trabeum and Poria placenta were used for fungal resistance of beech and pine samples, respectively. Synergistic effects were calculated based on the fungal results. It was concluded that binary combinations of A+G and G+N and also the ternary combination (A+G+N) have a synergistic effect in binary variations for pine wood samples while A+G and A+N binary combinations show synergistic effect for beech wood samples. In addition, it is seen that the ternary combination also has a synergistic effect as in beech wood samples.
Project Number
TUBITAK 1059B141801409
References
-
1. Dumarçay, S.; Iaych, K.; Lemor, A.; Gérardin, P. Int. Wood Prod. J. 2015, 6, 31-35.
-
2. Brocco, V.F.; Paes, J.B.; da Costa, L.G.; Brazolin, S.; Arantes, M.D.C. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2093-2099.
-
3. Shiny, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Mamatha, N.; Lingappa, B.. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol. 2019, 21, 347-356.
-
4. Hwang, W.J.; Kartal, S.N.; Yoshimura, T.; Imamura, Y. S. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science 2007, 63, 90-95.
-
5. EN, 47. Wood preservatives. Determination of the toxic values against larvae of Hylotrupes bajulus (Linnaeus) - (Laboratory method). 2005.
-
6. EN, 117, E. Wood preservatives. Determination of toxic values against Reticulitermes species (European termites) (Laboratory method). 2013.
-
7.EN, 113. Wood preservatives. Test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes – Determination of the toxic values. 2006.
-
8. Colby, S. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 1967, 15, 20-22.
-
9. Chiappini, E.; Molinari, P.; Busconi, M.; Callegari, M.; Fogher, C.; Bani, P.. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored product protection, 2010, 97-103.
-
10. Robinson, W.; Cannon, K. Melsheimer Entomol. Ser. 1981.
-
11. Yalçın, M.; Taşçıoğlu, C.; Plarre, R.; Akçay, Ç.; Busweıler, S. Kastamonu Univ. J. For. 2018, 18, 83-91.
-
12. Baker, J. The insecticidal action of some components of wood preservatives. Pestic. Sci. 1972, 3, 229-239.
-
13. Clément, J.-L.; Bagnères, A.-G.; Uva, P.; Wilfert, L.; Quintana, A.; Reinhard, J.; Dronnet, S. Insectes Soc. 2001, 48, 202-215.
-
14. Smythe, R.V.; Carter, F.L.; Baxter, C.C. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1971, 64, 59-62.
-
15. Nagnan, P.; Clement, J. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990, 18, 13-16.
-
16. Bultman, J.D.; Beal, R.H.; Ampong, F.F. For. Prod. J. 1979, 6, 46-51.
-
17. Peralta, R.C.G.; Menezes, E.B.; Carvalho, A.G.; Aguiar-Menezes, E.d.L. Rev. Árvore 2004, 28, 283-289.
-
18. França, T.S.F.A.; França, F.J.N.; Arango, R.A.; Woodward, B.M.; Arantes, M.D.C. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2016, 107, 88-91.
-
19. Clausen, C.A.; Kartal, S.N.; Arango, R.A.; Green, F. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1-5.
-
20. Bak, M.; Németh, R. BioResources 2018, 13, 7886-7899.
-
21. Mankowski, M.; Morrell, J.J. Wood Fiber Sci. 2000, 32.
-
22. Stanojevic, D.; Comic, L.; Stefanovic, O.; Solujic-Sukdolak, S. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 15, 307-311.
-
23. Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shao, A. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 193.
-
24. Hussain, A.; Alajmi, M.F.; Khan, M.A.; Pervez, S.A.; Ahmed, F.; Amir, S.; Husain, F.M.; Khan, M.S.; Shaik, G.M.; Hassan, I. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 8.
-
25. Jin, T.; He, Y. Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 6877-6885.
-
26. Arroyo, B.J.; Bezerra, A.C.; Oliveira, L.L.; Arroyo, S.J.; de Melo, E.A.; Santos, A.M.P. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125566.