ORAL REHABILITATION OF PATIENT WITH CLEIDOCRANIAL DYSPLASIA WITH A POLYAMIDE BASED REMOVABLE PARTIAL PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT

Year 2021, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 49 - 53, 29.12.2021

Yakup Kantacı Sedef Kotanlı

Abstract

The aim of this case report is to present the oral rehabilitation of a 22-year-old female patient with Cleidocranial
Dysplasia (CCD) who applied to our clinic. Also, it is to discuss the treatment alternatives that can be applied in
patients with CCD and the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives. Although the common opinion for the
dental treatment of individuals with CCD is multidisciplinary treatment, factors such as the patient's medical and
dental status, the patient's socioeconomic status, complications that may be occurred in multidisciplinary approaches,
and the time required for treatment may affect the treatment option. In addition to conventional two-dimensional
imaging methods, using cone-beam computed tomography images, which offer three-dimensional imaging in patients
with CCD, allows for more effective determination of complications that may occur during and after the operation,
and thus allows more accurate guidance to the treatments to be applied. In this case, considering the surgical and
orthodontic limitations and the socio-economic status of the patient, dental treatment was completed with the
application of polyamide-based removable partial prosthesis, and the patient's functional phonation and aesthetic
needs were met.

Keywords

Cleidocranial Dysplasia, polyamide-based removable partial prosthesis., removable partial prosthesis

References

• 1.Puvabanditsin S, February M, Mayne J, McConnell J, Mehta R. Cleidocranial dysplasia with 6p21. 1-p12. 3 microdeletion: A case report and literature review. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2018; 55(6):891-4.
• 2. Ma Y, Zhao F, and Yu D. Cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome with epilepsy: a case report. BMC pediatrics 2019; 19(1):1-6.
• 3. Ghomi AJ, Soufdoost RS, Barzegar MS, Hemmati MA. Oral Rehabilitation with Removable Partial Denture of a Patient with Cleidocranial Dysplasia. Case Reports in Dentistry 2020.
• 4. Atil F, Culhaoglu A, Kocyigit ID, Adisen Z, Misirlioglu M, Yilmaz B. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses of a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2018; 119(1): 12-6.
• 5. DasGupta R, Jebasingh FK, Asha HS, Thomas N. Cleidocranial dysostosis. Case Reports, 2015, bcr2015211308.
• 6. Suda N, Hattori M, Kosaki K, Banshodani A, Kozai K, Tanimoto K, Moriyama K. Correlation between genotype and supernumerary tooth formation in cleidocranial dysplasia. Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2010; 13(4), 197-202.
• 7. Suba Z, BalatonG, Gyulai-Gaál S, Balaton P, Barabás J, Tarján I. Cleidocranial dysplasia: diagnostic criteria and combined treatment. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2005: 16(6); 1122-6.
• 8. Ayub NAFM, Hamzah SH, Hussein AS, Rajali A, Ahmad MS. A case report of cleidocranial dysplasia: A noninvasive approach. Special Care in Dentistry 2021; 41(1): 111-117.
• 9. Ambard AJ, Clemens S, and Phillips DS. Multidisciplinary implant rehabilitation of a patient with cleidocranial dysostosis: a journey from age 13 to 21. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019; 28(4): p. 361-4.
• 10. Noh K, Kwon KR, Ahn H, Paek J, Pae A. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a cleidocranial dysplasia patient with vertical maxillofacial deficiency: a clinical report. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2014; 23(1): 64-70.
• 11. Berg RW, Kurtz KS, Watanabe I, Lambrakos A. Interim prosthetic phase of multidisciplinary management of cleidocranial dysplasia:―the Bronx Approach‖. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry 2011; 20: 20-25.
• 12. Kelly E and Nakamoto RY. Cleidocranial dysostosis—a prosthodontic problem. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1974; 31(5): 518-526.
• 13. Gopinath A, Reddy NA, and Rohra MG. 3 Dimensional Diagnosis Unravelling Prognosis of Multiple Impacted Teeth–A Case Report. Journal of international oral health: JIOH 2013; 5(4): 78.
• 14. Sutthiprapaporn P, Kongsomboon S, and Pisek P, Use of conebeam CT in a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia dramatically reduced the operation time. Oral Radiol, 2010; 26(1): 52-5.
• 15. Petropoulos VC, Balshi TJ, Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ. Treatment of a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia using osseointegrated implants: a patient report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2004; 19(2).
• 16. Tsuji M, Suzuki H, Suzuki S, Moriyama K. Three‐dimensional evaluation of morphology and position of impacted supernumerary teeth in cases of cleidocranial dysplasia. Congenital anomalies, 2020; 60(4): 106-14.
• 17. Martins A, Caixeirinho P, and Fernandes A. Case of odontomarelated infection in a cleidocranial dysplasia. BMJ case reports 2019; 12(7).
• 18. Chladek G, Żmudzki J, and Kasperski J. Long-term soft denture lining materials. Materials 2014; 7(8): 5816-42.
• 19. Delgado AH, Carvalho J, Borrecho G, Nascimento T, Silva ME, Félix SA, Mendes JJ. In situ multispecies colonization of an acrylic resin: Comparison to oral microbiome and potential for inflammatory response. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 2018; 9(3): 400.
• 20. Pavithra AS, Jayalakshmi Somasundaram AK. Reinforcement in Denture Base Resins-A Review. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 2021; 6261-74