Treatment of young permanent teeth pulpitis with formocresol pulpotomy

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 139 - 141, 25.08.2022

Gajanan Kulkarni , İzzet Yavuz

Öz

Background: Pulpitis arising from large caries in young permanent teeth present special treatment challenges. Conventional endodontic treatment is not possible due to immaturity of the root apices. Studies presenting inexpensive, reliable, interim and long-term treatment options are lacking.
Objective: These case reports present long-term outcomes of permanent teeth young children (6-12 years old) presenting with large carious lesions and treated with formocresol pulpotomies (FCP) and stainless steel crowns (SSC) or amalgam (Am) restorations.
Methods: Symptomatic first permanent molars with pulpitis and/or carious exposures were treated with full-strength formocresol and received pre-crimped, permanent molar stainless steel crowns cemented with a glass ionomer cement as final restorations. Clinical exams were performed every 6 months and radiographic exams were performed every 6-12 months.
Results: The median follow up period was 5 years with a range of 3-7 years. All teeth treated with FCP and SSC/Am remained clinically and radiographically asymptomatic. Pretreatment periapical radiolucencies when present resolved completely. Root development in all cases proceeded normally to completion.
Conclusions: Formocresol pulpotomy with SSC is a viable, inexpensive, interim and possibly long-term treatment option for immature permanent teeth in children, with large carious lesions and pulpitis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

formocresol, pulpotomy, permanent teeth, endodontics, pulp biology

Kaynakça

• 1. Yıldız Ş, Doğan MS. The Importance of Primary Teeth in Children’s Health. Research & Reviews in Health Sciences, 2021;143-150.
• 2. Daloğlu M, Güzel U, Görkem K. Root canal treatment for deciduous teeth: a review Meand Med Dent J, 2017;18:80-5.
• 3. Kulkarni GK, Dogan MS, Akleyin E, Yavuz I. Analysıs of Failures of Pulpotomy Treated Prımary Teeth: Page 3 of 6 A Case Series and Review. J Dent Oral Disord Ther 2021;9(1): 1- 6.
• 4. Leite AC, Rosenblatt A, da Silva Calixto M, da Silva CM, Santos N. Genotoxic effect of formocresol pulp therapy of deciduous teeth. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2012;747(1):93-7.
• 5. Zarzar PA, Rosenblatt A, Takahashi CS, Takeuchi PL, Júnior LC. Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study. Journal of dentistry. 2003;31(7):479-85.
• 6. Moretti AB, Sakai VT, Oliveira TM, Fornetti AP, Santos CF, Machado MA, Abdo RC. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. International endodontic journal. 2008;41(7):547-55.
• 7. Chandrashekhar S, Shashidhar J. Formocresol, still a controversial material for pulpotomy: A critical literature review. Journal of Restorative Dentistry. 2014;2(3):114.
• 8. Ward J. Vital pulp therapy in cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2002;28(1):29-37.