The Effect of Contrast Therapy in Exercise Recovery: A Meta-Analytical Approach
Abstract
Contrast therapy’s effects have varied across studies, necessitating an examination of its effect size. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the efficacy of contrast therapy on post-exercise recovery through a meta-analysis of exercise performance and physiological variables. Searches were conducted in electronic databases with the keywords "contrast therapy," "exercise performance," and "recovery”. Then articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated significant differences in sprint (g=0.3811, p<.05), muscle soreness (g=0.7192, p<.01), perceived fatigue (g=0.7384, p<.01), and blood CK (g=0.7043, p<.05), demonstrating the effectiveness of contrast therapy compared to passive recovery. However, no significant differences were found in jump (g=0.0866, p=.7083), flexibility (g=0.0585, p=.7531), thigh circumference (g=0.1636, p=.5654), and perception of recovery (g=0.3254, p=.0661), although there was a slight trend favoring contrast therapy over passive recovery. Given this, contrast therapy could be beneficial for sports that involve frequent sprints or repeated high-intensity exercise with short rest periods. Additionally, considering psychological aspects like muscle soreness and perceived fatigue for optimal performance, we believe contrast therapy positively affects post-exercise recovery compared to passive recovery. However, the quality of the studies was low, and there were not as many studies that included contrast therapy for each dependent variable as expected. As more studies are conducted in the future, it is expected that a more in-depth analysis can be conducted by improving the quality of the literature and reflecting various results.
Keywords
Contrast Therapy , Exercise Performance , Exercise Recovery , Meta-Analysis
References
- Argus, C. K., Broatch, J. R., Petersen, A. C., Polman, R., Bishop, D. J., & Halson, S. (2017). Cold-water immersion and contrast water therapy: no improvement of short-term recovery after resistance training. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 12(7), 886-892. [Pubmed]
- Ahokas, E. K., Ihalainen, J. K., Kyröläinen, H., & Mero, A. A. (2019). Effects of water immersion methods on postexercise recovery of physical and mental performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 33(6), 1488-1495. [Pubmed]
- Belza, B. (1994). The impact of fatigue on exercise performance. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 7(4), 176-180. [Pubmed]
- Barnett, A. (2006). Using recovery modalities between training sessions in elite athletes: does it help?. Sports medicine, 36, 781-796. [Pubmed]
- Brancaccio, P., Maffulli, N., & Limongelli, F. M. (2007). Creatine kinase monitoring in sport medicine. British medical bulletin, 81(1), 209-230. [Pubmed]
- Bissas, A., & Havenetidis, K. (2008). The use of various strength-power tests as predictors of sprint running performance. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 48(1), 49-54. [Pubmed]
- Bieuzen, F., Bleakley, C. M., & Costello, J. T. (2013). Contrast water therapy and exercise induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 8(4), e62356. [Pubmed]
- Brownsberger, J., Edwards, A., Crowther, R., & Cottrell, D. (2013). Impact of mental fatigue on self-paced exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(12), 1029-1036. [Pubmed]
- Broatch, J. R., Petersen, A., & Bishop, D. J. (2014). Postexercise cold water immersion benefits are not greater than the placebo effect. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(11), 2139-2147. [Pubmed]
- Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. BMJ Ment Health, 22(4), 153-160. [Pubmed]