The Impact of Training Pencak Silat Using Cooperative Model Type Jigsaw Towards Self-Regulated at Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Abstract
This research aims to determine the impact of training Pencak Silat using Cooperative Model Type Jigsaw towards Self-Regulation at Universitas Negeri Jakarta. This research was conducted at Negeri Jakarta, used an experiment with non-equivalent design. The population of this study is Universitas Negeri Jakarta college students, because there were only two classes with 33 students each, the author used a total sampling technique. Sample is 33 college, consisting of 17 men and 16 women at each class A and B. The instrument used is the self-regulated questionnaire. The result show that experimental class obtained a Statistical value of -14.682, Sig. 0,000. It can be concluded that there is an increase in Self-Regulation at the experimental class. The control class obtained a Statistical value of -0.713, Sig 0.412. It can be concluded that there is no increase in the Self-Regulation at the control class. Meanwhile for the Independent t Test, obtained a Statistical value of 13.039, Sig. 0,000. It can be concluded that students in the experimental class who practiced with the Cooperative Model Type Jigsaw gave better results when compared to students in the control class who practiced with the conventional model. For further research in Pencak Silat material, it is necessary to carry out further experimental research on Jurus Golok and Jurus Toya use of other cooperative methods such as STAD and TGT. In order to see their effects and the research should be conducted in a larger sample because the move more complex.
Keywords
Pencak Silat , Jurus Tunggal Tangan Kosong , Cooperative Model Type Jigsaw , Self-Regulated
References
- Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497–521. [CrossRef]
- Alvi, E., & Gillies, R. M. (2023). Self-regulated learning (SRL) perspectives and strategies of Australian primary school students: a qualitative exploration at different year levels. Educational Review, 75(4), 680–702. [CrossRef]
- Artanayasa, I. W., Suwiwa, I. G., & Mashuri, H. (2023). Jigsaw Cooperative Model: Solution for Active Soccer Practice Learning. Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), 521–525. [CrossRef]
- Boroughani, T., Xodabande, I., & Karimpour, S. (2023). Self-regulated learning with mobile devices for university students: exploring the impacts on academic vocabulary development. Discover Education, 2(1). [CrossRef]
- Boshoff-Knoetze, A., Duminy, L., & Du Toit, Y. (2023). Examining the effect of self-regulation failure on academic achievement in emergency remote teaching and learning versus face-to-face. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 342–354. [CrossRef]
- Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The self-regulation questionnaire. In L. VandeCreek, & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A sourcebook, vol. 17 ( pp. 281 – 292). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press / Professional Resource Exchange.
- Cereda, F. (2023). Methods and models in the context of physical activity and physical education: strenght, weakness and gaps. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(5), 1064–1075. [CrossRef]
- Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., Chien, S. Y., & Chang, S. C. (2023). Incorporating teacher intelligence into digital games: An expert system-guided self-regulated learning approach to promoting EFL students’ performance in digital gaming contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 534–553. [CrossRef]
- Cochon Drouet, O., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Margas, N. (2023). Effects of the Jigsaw method on student educational outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses. Front. Psychol, 14:1216437. [CrossRef]
- Cohen, R., Katz, I., Aelterman, N., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2022). Understanding shifts in students’ academic motivation across a school year: the role of teachers’ motivating styles and need-based experiences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38:963–988. [CrossRef]