The Prosocial-Antisocial Behavior and Empathic Skill Levels of Wheelchair Basketball Players in Sports

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1 - 11, 28.06.2019

Gülfem Sezen Balçıkanlı Ekrem Levent İlhan Oğuz Kaan Esentürk Okan Burçak Çelik

https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.547485

Cited By: 2

Öz

This
study aims to find out the prosocial and antisocial behavior as well as the
empathic skills of wheelchair basketball players in sports. A total of 230
wheelchair basketball players (216 males and 14 females) participated in this
study which uses relational screening model. The Prosocial and Antisocial
Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)
were used as data collection tools. Independent t-test, Cronbach Alpha, One-Way
Anova, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were used for the
analysis of data. The data obtained shows that there is a low level, meaningful
and positive correlation between the empathic skills of wheelchair basketball
players and their tendency for prosocial behavior in sports. In addition, a
medium-level, meaningful and negative correlation between their empathic skills
and tendency for antisocial behavior was found. It has been concluded that
perspective taking, empathic concern and fantasy which are dimensions of
empathy do not show a difference in the variable being a national athlete or
non-national athlete. It was seen that personal distress is higher in athletes
who are not national athletes. As a result of the analysis it was found out
that as the antisocial behavior of wheelchair basketball players towards their
teammates and opponents increase, their fantasy levels decrease. In light of
these findings, it may be said that while emphatic skills promote prosocial
behavior in wheelchair basketball players, they decrease antisocial behavior.
Based on these results, the empathy training which will be given to athletes to
promote prosocial behavior in sports is of great importance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wheelchair Basketball, Empathy, Prosocial-Antisocial Behavior in Sports

Kaynakça

• Akkoyun, F. (1987). Empatik eğilim ve ahlaki yargı. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(21), 91-98.
• Brasile, F. M., & Hedrick, B. N. (1996). The relationship of skills of elite wheelchair basketball competitors to the international functional classification system. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 30(2), 114-127.
• Davis HM. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983; 44(1): 113-126.
• Davis HM (1996). Empathy A Social Psychological Approach, 2nd. ed. USA: Westviewpress.
• Duquin, M.E., Schroeder-Braun, K. (1996). Power, empathy, and moral conflict in sport. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, Vol 2(4), 351-367.
• Engeler A (2005). Psikopati ve Antisosyal Kişilik Bozukluğu. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.
• Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). New York, NY: Wiley.
• Finley, M. A., & Rodgers, M. M. (2004). Prevalence and identification of shoulder pathology in athletic and nonathletic wheelchair users with shoulder pain: a pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(3B), 395.,
• Greif BE, Hogan R. The Theory and Measurement of Empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1973; 20(3): 280-284
• Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
• Hudson, Z., & Brown, A. (2003). Athletes with disability. Physical therapies in sport and exercise, 521-533.
• Hutzler, Y., Vanlandewijck, Y., & Van Vlierberghe, M. (2000). Anaerobic performance of older female and male wheelchair basketball players on a mobile wheelchair ergometer. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(4), 450-465.
• Kalliopuska, M. Empatia- tie ihmisyyteen. Helsinki. Kirjayhtyrna. 1983.
• Kasum, G., Lazarevic, L., Jakovljevic, S., Bacanac, L. & Eminovic, F. (2012). Personality characteristics of Serbian male wheelchair and professional basketball players. Acta Gymnica, 42(2), 41-47.
• Kavussanu, M. (2006). Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(06), 575-588.
• Kavussanu, M., Seal, A., & Phillips, D. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 326–344.
• Kavussanu, M., & Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(1), 97-117.
• Kavussanu, M., Stamp, R., Slade, G., & Ring, C. (2009). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male and female soccer players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(S1), S62-S76.
• Kavussanu, M., Stanger, N., & Boardley, I. D. (2013). The Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in Sport Scale: Further evidence for construct validity and reliability. Journal of sports sciences, 31(11), 1208-1221.
• Kavussanu, M., Ring, C., & Kavanagh, J. (2015). Antisocial behavior, moral disengagement, empathy and negative emotion: A comparison between disabled and able-bodied athletes. Ethics & Behavior, 25(4), 297-306.
• Marcus, R. F., Telleen, S., & Rcke, E. J. Relation between cooperation and empathy in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 346-347.
• Peters, A. N. (2000). Hegemonic masculinity and Kaufman's triad of violence: elite male athletes' attitudes regarding male/female relationships. National Library of Canada= Bibliothèque nationale du Canada.
• Sage, L., Kavussanu, M., & Duda, J.L. (2006). Goal orientations and moral identity as predictors of prosocial and antisocial functioning in male association football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 455–466.
• Sezen-Balçıkanlı, G. (2009). Fair Play and Empathy: A Research Study with Student Teachers. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 6(4), 79-84.
• Sezen-Balçıkanlı, G. & Yıldıran, İ. (2011). Profesyonel Futbolcuların Sportmenlik Yönelimleri ve Empatik Eğilim Düzeyleri. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 49-56
• Sezen-Balcikanli, G., & Yildiran, I. (2012). Sportspersonship Orientation and Empathy: a Study of Professional Football Players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(1), 18.
• Sezen-Balçıkanlı, G. (2013). The Turkish Adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3 (18), 271-276.
• Shearer, D., & Bressan, E. (2010). Psychological aspects of wheelchair sport. Wheelchair sport: A complete guide for athletes, coaches and teachers, Human Kinetics 99-115.
• Shields LLD, Bredemeier LJB. Chracter Development and Physical Activity. USA: Human Kinetics; 1994.
• Skordilis, E. K., Koutsouki, D., Asonitou, K., Evans, E., & Jensen, B. (2002). Comparison of sport achievement orientation between wheelchair and able-bodied basketball athletes. Perceptual and motor skills, 94(1), 214-218.
• Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 365-392.
• Vanlandewijck, Y. C., Evaggelinou, C., Daly, D. D., Van Houtte, S., Verellen, J., Aspeslagh, V., ... & Zwakhoven, B. (2003). Proportionality in wheelchair basketball classification. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20(4), 369-380.
• Vanlandewijck, Y. C., Evaggelinou, C., Daly, D. J., Verellen, J., Van Houtte, S., Aspeslagh, V., ... & Zwakhoven, B. (2004). The relationship between functional potential and field performance in elite female wheelchair basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(7), 668-675. Yost, G. J., & Schmoll, W. D. (1995). Sport medicine and the physically disabled. The upper extremity in sport medicine. USA: Mosby-Year Book, 885-897.