ONE DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF GASOLINE ALCOHOL DUAL FUEL COMBUSTION ENGINE

Abstract

In this study, experimental outcomes from a Spark ignition engine (SI) which fueled with E1 to E20 (Percentage of alcohol content in total fuel blend is various between 1% and 20%) were collated with recital of combustion codes for one dimensional analysis.1-D codes, which is called SRM-Suite (Stochastic Reactor Model) and Chemkin-Pro, were estimated from combustion, emissions and heat transfer point in an SI engine. The estimations are based on empirical data and working situations which were done at karadeniz technical university Research Labs in Turkey. A bunch of empirical data was employed for analysis in both of software’s according to both expanded and decreased kinetic mechanisms. Simulation outcomes were collated to empirical data from heat release rate, pressure and emission point. The vicissitude of the H2O2, temperature and OH which weren’t available experimentally were achieved by comparisons between two codes. Analysis demonstrates that each code has pluses and minuses. The advantages of SRM-. Suite are blow-by Crevice, ring gap, and probability density function (PDF) – based stochastic reactor modeling and these advantages helped with better convergence of the outcomes. But, Chemkin-Pro outcomes were logical and solution duration was much shorter than SRM-.Suite. Also it was clear that both decreased and expanded kinetic mechanisms had huge effect on analysis

Keywords

• One-dimensional simulation, Chemical kinetic mechanism, SI engine, SRM-Suite, Chemkin-Pro

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2013). Effect of Methanol – Gasoline Blends on S.I. Engines Performance and Pollution. Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, 13,5-15
2. Anderson,J.E.,DiCicco,D.M.,Ginder,J.M.,Kramer,u., Leone, T.G., Raney-Pablo, H.E & Wallin>on, T.J. (2012). Quantifying the potential benefits in the United States. Fuel,97, 585-594
3. Battin-Leclerc, F. (2008). Detailed chemical kinetic models for the low-temperature combustion of hydrocarbons with application to gasoline and diesel fuel surrogates. Middle east journal of scientific Research, 4,429-431.
4. Feng, R.Yang,J.,Zahng,D.,Deng,B.,Jiangin,F.Liu,J. & Liu,X (2013). Experimental study on SI engine fuelled with butanol–gasoline blend and H2O addition .,. Journal of Energy conversion and management, 74,192-200.addition ,Energy conversion and management, 74,192-200.
5. Fröjd, k. P. (2012). 1D engine modeling with detailed reaction kinetics. Journal of Swedish and Finnish National Committees of the International Flame Research Foundation,17, 233-228.
6. Bayraktar, H. (2005). Experimental and theoretical investigation of using gasoline– ethanol blends in spark-ignition engines. Renewable energy, 30, 1733-1747.
7. He, B., &Zhao,H. (2015). Comparison of combustion characteristics of nbutanol/ethanol–gasoline blends in a HCCI engine. Energy Conversion and Management, l95 pp 101-109.
8. Iliev, S. (2015). A Comparison of Ethanol and Methanol Blending with Gasoline Using a 1-D engine Model. Procedia Engineering., 100, 1013-1022.

9. Kumar, K. .. (2014). Autoignition response of n-butanol and its blends with primary reference fuel constituents of gasoline, Combustion and Flame,162, 2466- 2479.
10. Masum, B., Masjuki,H.,Kalam,M.,Fattah,M.,Palash,S. &Abedin,M. (2013). Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission in SI engine . Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 209-222.
11. Manzetti, S. (2013). Background for new guidelines for emission control. Fuel, 140 ,293-301.
12. Najafi, G., Tavakoli,T.,Yusaf,F., & Faizollahnejad M (2008). Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural network. Applied Energy, 86 630-639.
13. Najafi, G., Ghobadian ,B., Yusaf, T., Ardebili ,S. & Mamat, R.. (2014). Optimization of performance and exhaust emission parameters of a SI (spark ignition) engine with gasoline-ethanol blended fuels using response surface methodology. energy, 110 ,1-15.
14. Neroorkar, K. a. (2011). Modeling of vapor-liquid equilibrium of gasoline-ethanol blended fuels for flash boiling simulations. Journal of Fuel,90,665-673.
15. Pathre, A. F, & Pathre,P.A. (2012). Experimental Investigation of Methanol, Ethanol and Butanol Blends with Gasoline on Si Engine. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2 ,2250-2459.
16. Wang ,Y.,Yao,M. &Zheng,M. (2013). A semi-detailed chemical kinetic model of gasoline surrogate fuel for internal combustion engine applications. fuel,113,347- 356.
17. Zahang, C. & Shen, P. K. (2011). The simulation based on CHEMKIN for homogeneous charge compression ignition combustion with on-board fuel reformation in the chamber. international journal of hydrogen energy 37, 446-4475.
18. Zhang, Z.,TY,W., & XZ,M.(2014). Combustion and particle number emissions of a direct injection spark ignition engine operating on ethanol/gasoline and nbutanol/gasoline blends with exhaust gas recirculation. fuel,130,177-188.