Production of fuel-based carbon footprint distribution map using spatial interpolation methods based on GIS

Abstract

The Earth is a complex system where living and non-living elements coexist in a delicate balance. Climate change is the primary factor responsible for the degradation of this system over time. The far-reaching consequences of climate change impact various aspects of our lives, including the physical environment, urban settings, human activities, economy, technology, agriculture, food production, access to clean water, and public health, all of which are widely acknowledged. Human-induced greenhouse gas emissions in these areas significantly trigger global climate change. Hence, addressing and mitigating the environmental damage from these emissions and the interconnected climate change phenomena is imperative. This situation is where the concept of "carbon footprint" gains prominence in assessing the extent of this damage. Carbon footprint serves as an essential measure in managing and curbing climate change. This study focused on controlling and mitigating carbon emissions, one of the primary greenhouse gasses responsible for climate change, by implementing spatial interpolation techniques based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The investigation targeted the Beşirli neighborhood in the Ortahisar district of Trabzon province. Data concerning electricity and natural gas usage were acquired from relevant institutions to perform carbon footprint calculations. Subsequently, carbon footprint calculations were conducted utilizing the acquired data within the specified region. The resulting outputs were systematically organized, integrated into the GIS environment, and linked to their respective geographical locations. Eventually, region-specific carbon footprint distribution maps were generated using selected spatial interpolation methods. These maps enabled a spatial observation of points exhibiting variability in terms of carbon emissions, thereby highlighting the carbon footprints evident in the region. The ultimate goal of this endeavor is to propose practical measures for minimizing the adverse environmental impacts by suggesting strategies to reduce and prevent carbon footprints associated with carbon emissions in the relevant areas.

Keywords

• Climate Change
• Greenhouse gas emissions
• Carbon emissions
• Carbon footprint
• GIS

References

1. Fang, J., Zhu, J., Wang, S., Yue, C., & Shen, H. (2011). Global warming, human-induced carbon emissions, and their uncertainties. Science China Earth Sciences, 54, 1458-1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4292-0
2. Nordhaus, W. D. (1993). Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Resource and Energy Economics, 15(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-7655(93)90017-O
3. United Nations (UN). (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
4. NASA. (2023). What is the greenhouse effect? – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/19/what-is-the-greenhouse-effect.
5. Tol, R. S. (2021). Europe’s climate target for 2050: an assessment. Intereconomics, 56(6), 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1012-7
6. Rörsch, A., Courtney, R. S., & Thoenes, D. (2005). Global warming and the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: A critical consideration of the evidence. Energy & Environment, 16(1), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305053516190
7. Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinmer, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., ... & Zommers, Z. (2023). Synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Longer report. IPCC.
8. Clarke, B., Otto, F., Stuart-Smith, R., & Harrington, L. (2022). Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribution perspective. Environmental Research: Climate, 1(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac6e7d

9. Mkorombindo, T., & Balkissoon, R. (2021). Journal Club: Respiratory Impact of Wildfire Smoke. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: Journal of the COPD Foundation, 8(3), 408. https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0244
10. Maslin, M. (2014). Climate change: a very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
11. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., ... & 15,364 Scientist Signatories from 184 Countries. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice. BioScience, 67(12), 1026-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125
12. Pecl, G. T., Araújo, M. B., Bell, J. D., Blanchard, J., Bonebrake, T. C., Chen, I. C., ... & Williams, S. E. (2017). Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science, 355(6332), eaai9214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9214
13. IPBES. (2019). The global assessment report of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
14. Aksoy, F. (2023). A framework to improve the modeling of the socioeconomic impacts of climate change [Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University].
15. World Bank. (2023). CO2 Emissions (kt), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?most_recent_year_desc=true&type=shaded&view=map&year=2020
16. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Vazquez‐Brust, D., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Andriani Ribeiro, D. (2020). The interplay between stakeholders, resources and capabilities in climate change strategy: converting barriers into cooperation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1362-1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2438
17. Akpan, U. F., & Akpan, G. E. (2012). The contribution of energy consumption to climate change: a feasible policy direction. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(1), 21-33.
18. IEA. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022. www.iea.org/t&c/
19. Plassmann, K., & Edwards-Jones, G. (2010). Carbon foot printing and carbon labelling of food products. Environmental Assessment and Management in the Food Industry, 272-296. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090225.3.272
20. Mattila, T., Kujanpää, M., Dahlbo, H., Soukka, R., & Myllymaa, T. (2011). Uncertainty and sensitivity in the carbon footprint of shopping bags. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(2), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00326.x
21. Güller, S. (2018). Carbon footprint assesment of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant in Mugla [Master’s thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University].
22. Lee, Y. J. (2015). Land, carbon and water footprints in Taiwan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.004
23. Song, G., Che, L., & Zhang, S. (2016). Carbon footprint of a scientific publication: A case study at Dalian University of Technology, China. Ecological Indicators, 60, 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.044
24. Lombardi, M., Laiola, E., Tricase, C., & Rana, R. (2017). Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.005
25. Chen, B., Qian, W., Yang, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, L. (2021). Carbon footprint and water footprint of cashmere fabrics. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 29, 4(148), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8235
26. Huang, T., & Tang, Z. (2021). Estimation of tourism carbon footprint and carbon capacity. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(3), 1040-1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctab026
27. Uzunali, A., & Yazıcı, T. (2023). Carbon footprint changing with Covid-19 in Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(10), 10685-10707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02500-6
28. Islam, R., Chowdhury, S., Jannat, N., & Paul, P. (2022). Carbon footprint evaluation of local dwellings in Bangladesh towards low carbon society. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(3), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2021-0018
29. Johnson, E. P. (2012). Carbon footprints of heating oil and LPG heating systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 35, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.004
30. Melendez, K. (2013). Carbon footprint calculations for Oregon State University and Guadalupe, Cerro Punta, Panama [Master’s thesis, Oregon State University].
31. Chung, C. Y., Miaw, C. L., Huang, Y. C., Chung, C. C., & Lo, T. J. (2014). Investigation of carbon footprint on campus-A case study of Tajen University. Advanced Materials Research, 962, 1495-1499. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.1495
32. Fitzpatrick, J. J., McCarthy, S., & Byrne, E. P. (2015). Sustainability insights and reflections from a personal carbon footprint study: The need for quantitative and qualitative change. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 1, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2015.05.004
33. Binboga, G., & Unal, A. (2018). A research on the calculation of carbon footprint of Manisa Celal Bayar University at sustainability axis. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 21, 187-202.
34. Okan, B. (2019). Comparison of energy consumption and carbon foot print of wastewater treatment systems through modeling [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University].
35. Filimonau, V., Archer, D., Bellamy, L., Smith, N., & Wintrip, R. (2021). The carbon footprint of a UK University during the COVID-19 lockdown. Science of the Total Environment, 756, 143964.
36. Uludağ, P. (2022). Evaluation of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Terzioğlu Campus in terms of energy and carbon footprint [Master’s thesis, Giresun University].
37. Hacar, M. (2020). A rule-based approach for generating urban footprint maps: from road network to urban footprint. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 5(2), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.623592
38. Bastianoni, S., Marchi, M., Caro, D., Casprini, P., & Pulselli, F. M. (2014). The connection between 2006 IPCC GHG inventory methodology and ISO 14064-1 certification standard–A reference point for the environmental policies at sub-national scale. Environmental Science & Policy, 44, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.015
39. Hickmann, T. (2017). Voluntary global business initiatives and the international climate negotiations: A case study of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.183
40. Bhatia, P., & Ranganathan, J. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
41. United Nations (UN). (1998). Kyoto Protocol to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
42. Clémençon, R. (2016). The two sides of the Paris climate agreement: Dismal failure or historic breakthrough?. The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496516631362
43. ISO. (2018). International Standard ISO 14064, Second Edition. Switzerland.
44. Yañez, P., Sinha, A., & Vásquez, M. (2019). Carbon footprint estimation in a university campus: Evaluation and insights. Sustainability, 12(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010181
45. Yomralıoğlu, T. (2000). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Uygulamalar. 7.Baskı (2015), s.480, ISBN 975-97369-0-X, İber Ofset. İstanbul.
46. IPCC. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. General Guidance and Reporting. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol1.html.
47. Bıyık, Y. (2018). Calculation of carbon footprint originated from highways in Isparta province [Master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University].
48. Jochem, H., & Wolfram, T. (2014). Carbon Footprint. Environment, Sustainability Report, Volkswagen, 126-129.
49. Kılıç, İ., Yaylı, B., & Elekberov, A. (2018). Bursa Bölgesinde Faaliyet Gösteren Üç Adet Broyler İşletmesinin Karbon Ayak İzinin Tahminlenmesi. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 224-230. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.480796
50. IPCC/UNEP/OECD/IEA. (1997). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume III: Reference Manual, Chapter 1 pp 4-44, 62-98, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Programme, Organization for Economic CoOperation and Development, International Energy Agency, Paris.
51. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2023). İklim Değişikliği ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
52. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2023). https://enerji.gov.tr/Media/Dizin/BHIM/tr/Duyurular//Bilgi_Formu_Web_Sitesi_2019_202110071443.pdf.
53. Çolak, H. E. (2010). Spatial analysis of cancer cases by geographical information systems in the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey [Doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University].
54. Yaprak, S., & Arslan, E. (2008). Kriging Yöntemi ve Geoit Yüksekliklerin Enterpolasyonu. Jeodezi ve Jeoinformasyon Dergisi, (98), 36-42.
55. Çolak, E., & Memişoğlu, T. (2021). Thornthwaite iklim sınıflandırma yöntemine göre Karadeniz Bölgesi iklim sınır haritasının CBS ile üretilmesi. Geomatik, 6(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.651702
56. Yilmaz, M., & Kuru, B. (2019). Makro ve Mikro Ölçekteki Lokal Jeoid Tespiti için Enterpolasyon Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması. Geomatik, 4(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.465050
57. Arslanoğlu M., & Özçelik M. (2005). Improvement of Digital Land Elevation Data. TMMOB Chamber of Surveying and Cadastre Engineers 10. Turkish Scientific and Technical Mapping Congress, 28 March- 1 April.
58. Uyan, M. (2019). Comparison of different interpolation techniques in determining of agricultural soil index on land consolidation projects. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.422570