Identification of appropriate locations for the establishment of solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants using Station-based and ERA5 datasets in the Mediterranean Region of Türkiye

Abstract

Energy demand is a crucial aspect of human society, and efforts have been made to meet this increasing demand through various energy production methods. However, the extensive use of fossil fuels for energy generation has led to environmental degradation and pollution issues such as global warming, climate change, and air pollution. In response to these challenges, renewable energy sources have recently gained prominence, with solar energy playing a key role in this transition. This study focuses on developing a solar PV power plant through site selection using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method integrated with a geographical information system (GIS). The objectives include identifying the optimal site for the power plant, evaluating meteorological datasets (Station-based and ERA-5 datasets), and conducting statistical analyses on those data sets. The study area is located in the southern part of Türkiye, which includes three watersheds in the Mediterranean Region. This research utilized a range of meteorological and topographical data, with GIS operations such as Euclidean Distance analysis, reclassification of raster data, weight assignment, and overlay analysis being performed. Expert Choice software was employed to determine the final weights based on questionnaire results. Statistical comparisons indicated a high correlation among the datasets, with anomalies observed in humidity and solar irradiation values during specific months. The study found a consistent pattern in identifying suitable locations for solar plants, with minor variations in classification areas. Most areas and regions were classified as "Moderately Suitable" in both applications

Keywords

• solar energy
• AHP
• ERA5
• GIS
• Türkiye

References

1. Abdin, Z., Alim, M. A., Saidur, R., Islam, M. R., Rashmi, W., Mekhilef, S., & Wadi, A. (2013). Solar energy harvesting with the application of nanotechnology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.023
2. Adjiski, V., & Serafimovski, D. (2024). GIS- and AHP-based decision systems for evaluating optimal locations of photovoltaic power plants: Case study of Republic of North Macedonia. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 18(1), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2024.18.1.51
3. Atalay, I., & Mortan, K. (1997). Regional geography of Türkiye. Milet Publishing Limited.
4. Balta, H., & Yumurtaci, Z. (2024). Investigation and Optimization of Integrated Electricity Generation from Wind, Wave, and Solar Energy Sources. Energies, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030603
5. Barzehkar, M., Sharifzadeh, M., Jafari, S., & Emami, Y. (2021). Decision support tools for wind and solar farm site selection in Isfahan Province, Iran. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23(4), 1179–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02133-2
6. Cengiz, M., Erol, R., & Aydın, A. (2015). A review of prices for photovoltaic systems. International Journal on Technology Physical Problems of Engineering, 7(3), 8–13.
7. Unel, F. B., Kusak, L., & Yakar, M. (2023). GeoValueIndex map of public property assets generating via Analytic Hierarchy Process and Geographic Information System for Mass Appraisal: GeoValueIndex. Aestimum, 82, 51-69..
8. Demirgül, T., Demir, V., & Sevimli, M. F. (2024). Farklı makine öğrenmesi yaklaşımları ile Türkiye’nin solar radyasyon tahmini. Geomatik, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1374383

9. Di Grazia, S., & Tina, G. M. (2024). Optimal site selection for floating photovoltaic systems based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A case study. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43(1), Article 2167999. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2167999
10. Hasanzaeh, M., Kamran, K. V., Feizizadeh, B., & Mollabashi, S. H. (2024). GIS-based spatial decision-making approach for solar energy site selection, Ardabil, Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1341451
11. Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., ... Thépaut, J.-N. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
12. Islam, M. R., Alam, K., Rahman, M. M., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2024). Site suitability assessment for solar power plants in Bangladesh: A GIS-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. Renewable Energy, 220, 119595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119595
13. Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
14. Jun, D., Chen, J., & Liu, H. (2014). Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.005
15. Koc, A., Turk, S., & Şahin, G. (2019). Multi-criteria of wind-solar site selection problem using a GIS-AHP-based approach with an application in Igdir Province, Türkiye. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 32298–32310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06318-4
16. Kocabaldır, C., & Yücel, M. A. (2020). GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis of site selection for photovoltaic power plants in Çanakkale Province. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.720689
17. Kocabaldır, C., & Yücel, M. A. (2023). GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for spatial planning of solar photovoltaic power plants in Çanakkale province, Türkiye. Renewable Energy, 212, 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.075
18. Lewis, N. S. (2007). Toward cost-effective solar energy use. Science, 315(5813), 798–801. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137014
19. Occhiena, C. (2023). The statistics handbook (Version 0.2). https://www.academia.edu/115881275/The_Statistics_Handbook
20. Önder, M., Güntel, A., & Kaya, Ö. Y. (2022). A geographical information systems (GIS) perspective on European green deal and sustainability. Advanced GIS, 2(1), Article 1.
21. Parida, B., Iniyan, S., & Goic, R. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1625–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.032
22. Panwar, N., Kaushik, S., & Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1513–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037
23. Rekik, S., & El Alimi, S. (2023). Optimal wind-solar site selection using a GIS-AHP-based approach: A case of Tunisia. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 18, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100355
24. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
25. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
26. Sener, S., Sener, E., Nas, B., & Karagüzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 30(11), 2037–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.024
27. Soukissian, T. H., Karathanasi, F. E., & Zaragkas, D. K. (2021). Exploiting offshore wind and solar resources in the Mediterranean using ERA5 reanalysis data. Energy Conversion and Management, 237, 114092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114092
28. Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics (with special reference to the biological sciences). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19620040313
29. Suprova, N. T., Zidan, M. A. R., & Rashid, A. R. M. H. (2020, December 26–27). Optimal site selection for solar farms using GIS and AHP: A literature review. International Conference on Industrial & Mechanical Engineering and Operations Management (IMEOM) (Dhaka, Bangladesh). IEOM Society International.
30. Taktak, F., & Ilı, M. (2018). Güneş Enerji Santrali (GES) Geliştirme: Uşak Örneği. Geomatik, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.329561
31. Talibi, M., Boutallaka, M., El Mazi, M., Hmamouchi, M., & El Hairchi, K. (2025). Assessment of current and future land sensitivity to degradation under climate change in the upstream Ouergha watershed (Morocco) using GIS and AHP method. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 10(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1521350
32. Tarek, M., Brissette, F. P., & Arsenault, R. (2020). Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(5), 2527–2544. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2527-2020
33. Yıldız, E., & Er, F. (2023). Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri ve çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hibrit çözüm yaklaşımı ile Siirt örneği. Geomatik, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1228779
34. Yılmaz, İ., Kocer, A., & Aksoy, E. (2024). Site selection for solar power plants using GIS and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Case study of the western mediterranean region of Turkiye. Renewable Energy, 237, 121799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121799
35. Wilczak, J. M., Akish, E., Capotondi, A., & Compo, G. P. (2024). Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications. Energies, 17(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071667