Rapid urbanization and decline of Urban Green Space

Abstract

Background. The growth of urban populations leads to swift urban development. Consequently, much of the unplanned expansion of new neighborhoods results in the loss of public open space. The deficiency of public open space, particularly Urban Green Space (UGS), diminishes the quality of life and adversely affects community health. This study seeks to provide an overview of the significance of UGS. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the accessibility of UGS in the context of Famagusta city in Cyprus. Method. The methodology employed in this study integrates geographical information systems, questionnaires, and field surveys to assess UGS accessibility within the study area. Additionally, the principles of English Nature concerning UGS accessibility were utilized as a foundation for this evaluation. Result. The findings of the study indicate that the rapid urbanization of the area has led to a reduction in UGS. Indeed, the existing UGS in Famagusta is both physically and visually inaccessible. The absence of paved pedestrian pathways, lighting, recreational amenities, and seating furniture renders the UGS ineffective. The current circumstances necessitate immediate action from the relevant authorities.

Keywords

• Accessibility
• Famagusta
• Geographical Information System
• Urban Green Space
• Urbanization

References

1. Woolley H: Urban Open Spaces, 1st edn. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003.
2. Quality of Life in Kaduna, Nigeria: Residents' Perceptions and Sustainable Strategies. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2024, 8(1):16-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n1-2
3. Zhou X, Rana MP: Social benefits of urban green space : A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. Management of Environmental Quality 2012, 23(2):173-189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204921
4. Herzele AV, Wiedemann T: A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 63(2):109-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
5. Bhaskar P: Urbanization And Changing Green Spaces In Indian Cities (Case Study – City Of Pune). International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences 2012, 2(2):148-156.
6. Council of Europe: Recommendation No. R (86) 11: of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Urban Open Space. In. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 1986.
7. Low S, Taplin D, Scheld S: Chapter 4 The Ellis Island Bridge Proposal: Cultural Values, Park Access, and Economics. In: Rethinking Urban Parks. edn. New York, USA: University of Texas Press; 2005: 69-100. doi:https://doi.org/10.7560/706859-007
8. Hoskins JA: The Green Lungs of London. Indoor and Built Environment 2004, 13(4):247-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X04046196

9. Fuladlu K: Environmental Parameters for Campus Outdoor Space: A Microclimate Analysis of the Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU) Campus. Journal of Green Building 2021, 16(3):217-236. doi:https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.16.3.217
10. Nature: Accessible Natural Green Space Standards in Towns and Cities: A Review and Toolkit for their Implementation. In. Edited by Handley J, Pauleit S, Slinn P, Barber A, Baker M, Jones C, Lindley S. Peterborough: English Nature Research Reports; 2003.
11. Benameur O, Leghrib F, Laroui A: Assessing Urban Green Space Accessibility for Sustainable Development in Mostaganem, Algeria: A Space Syntax Approach. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2024, 8(1):197–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n1-11
12. Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Catherine C, Kate D, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan RJ: Increasing walking: How Important Is Distance To, Attractiveness, and Size of Public Open Space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28(2):169-176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
13. Jackson LE: The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64(4):191-200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X
14. ACK, Maheswaran R: The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health 2010, 33(2):212-222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
15. Fitzhugh EC, Jr. DRB, Evans MF: Urban Trails and Physical Activity: A Natural Experiment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010, 39(3):259-262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.010
16. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA: Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity: A Review of Evidence about Parks and Recreation. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2007, 29(4):315-354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701394865
17. Sanesi G, Chiarello F: Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2006, 4(3-4):125–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001
18. Gobster PH: Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 1998, 41(1):43-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00045-0
19. Rasidi MH, Jamirsah N, Said I: Urban Green Space Design Affects Urban Residents’ Social Interaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012, 68:464-480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.242
20. Koohsari MJ: Access To Public Open Space: Is Distribution Equitable Across Different Socio-Economic Areas. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 2011, 5(2):67-72. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4090/juee.2011.v5n2.067072
21. McConnachie MM, Shackleton CM: Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. Habitat International 2010, 34(2):244-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.009
22. Tamosiunas A, Grazuleviciene R, Luksiene D, Dedele A, Reklaitiene R, Baceviciene M, Vencloviene J, Bernotiene G, Radisauskas R, Malinauskiene V et al: Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environmental Health 2014, 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-20
23. Tian Y, Jim CY, Wang H: Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city. Landscape and Urban Planning 2014, 121:97-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.001
24. Solecki WD, Welch JM: Urban parks: green spaces or green walls? Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 32(2):93-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)00193-7
25. Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M: Urban residential environments and senior citizens' longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2002, 56(12):913-918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.12.913
26. Koohsari MJ, Mavoa S, Villanueva K, Sugiyama T, Badland H, Kaczynski AT, Owen N, Giles-Corti B: Public openspace, physicalactivity, urban design and public health: Concepts ,methods and research agenda. Health & Place 2015, 33:75-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009
27. Nutsford D, Pearson AL, Kingham S: An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health 2013, 127(11):1005-1011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.016
28. Thompson CW, Roe J, Aspinall P, Mitchell R, Clow A, Miller D: More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105(3):221-229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
29. Richardson EA, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Kingham S: Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health 2013, 127(4):318-324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004
30. Mensah CA: Destruction of Urban Green Spaces: A Problem Beyond Urbanization in Kumasi City (Ghana). American Journal of Environmental Protection 2014, 3(1):1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20140301.11
31. Chen J, Chang Z: Rethinking urban green space accessibility: Evaluating and optimizing public transportation system through social network analysis in megacities. Landscape and Urban Planning 2015, 143:150-159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.007
32. Colak E, Bediroğlu G, Baykal TM: GIS-based determination of potential snow avalanche areas: A case study of Rize Province of Türkiye. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2024, 9(2):199-210. doi:https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1367334
33. Rahman MM, Sarder M: GIS-based semi-variogram model selection for the preparation of Modified Mercalli Intensity map of Dinajpur Sadar, Bangladesh. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2025, 11(1):136-148. doi:https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1656666
34. Anwer HA, Hassan A: Identifying Suitable Dam Locations in Al Dinder: Integrating GIS, Remote Sensing, and Hydrological Factors. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2025, 10(3):290-302. doi:https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1579147
35. Ünel FB, Kuşak L, Yakar M, Doğan H: Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri ve analitik hiyerarşi prosesi kullanarak Mersin ilinde otomatik meteoroloji gözlem istasyonu yer seçimi. Geomatik 2023, 8(2):107-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1136951
36. Ayalke ZG, Şişman A: Google Earth Engine kullanılarak makine öğrenmesi tabanlı iyileştirilmiş arazi örtüsü sınıflandırması: Atakum, Samsun örneği. Geomatik 2024, 9(3):375-390. doi:https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1472160
37. Koca C, Kaymaz ÇK: CBS tabanlı ÇKKV-AHS yöntemi ile ekoturizm alanlarının yer seçimi: Çamlıhemşin İlçesi Örneği. Geomatik 2024, 9(2):185-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1419623
38. Sanaei F, Feizizadeh B, Naboureh A, Yakar M: An integrated semiautomated and transferable data driven approach for urban texture mapping. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2025, 11(1):183-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1681173
39. Partigöç NS, Dinçer C: Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (CBS) tabanlı afet risk analizi: Denizli ili örneği. Geomatik 2024, 9(1):27-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1261051
40. Uçar F, Demir Ş, Yakar M: Türkiye'de harita mühendisliği alanında hazırlanan bilimsel çalışmalara; kadastro, mülkiyet ve taşınmaz kavramları üzerinden bir inceleme. Geomatik 2025, 10(2):157-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1586150
41. Dilmac H, Ilci V, Şaşmaz NT, Ozulu İM: The Effect of Ground Control Points Located on Roofs on Building Facade Accuracy. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2025, 10(2):164-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1535675
42. Fuladlu K: Human activities and increased anthropogenic emissions: A remote sensing study in Cyprus. Environmental Development 2024, 51:101023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101023
43. Mirbagheri F: Historical Dictionary of Cyprus. US: Scarecrow Press, Inc.; 2009.
44. Fuladlu K: Population increase and raised of environmental consequences: A time series research in Cyprus. Advances in Space Research 2026, 77(2):1815-1829. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.112
45. Fuladlu K, Altan H: Examination of the Population Density Impact on Major Air Pollutants: A Study in the Case of Germany. In: Innovating Strategies and Solutions for Urban Performance and Regeneration. Edited by Piselli C, Altan H, Balaban O, Kremer P. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022: 211-218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98187-7_16
46. Önal Ş, Dağli U, Doratli N: The urban problems of Gazimagusa (Famagusta) and proposals for the future. Cities 1999, 16(5):333-351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-2751(99)00031-1
47. Fuladlu K, Riza M, İlkan M: Monitoring Urban Sprawl Using Time-Series Data: Famagusta Region of Northern Cyprus. SAGE Open 2021, 11(2):21582440211007465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007465
48. Oktay D: Cyprus: the South and the North. In: Urban Issues and Urban Policies in the New EU Countries. edn. Edited by Kempen RV, Vermeulen M, Baan A: Ashgate Pub Co; 2005: 205-231.
49. Oktay D, Marans RW: Overall Quality of Urban Life and Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Household Survey in the Walled City of Famagusta. Open house international 2010, 35(3):27-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2010-B0004
50. Fuladlu K: Thermal Response to Land-Use Land-Cover Patterns: An Experimental Study in Famagusta, Cyprus. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2022, 50(9):2100284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202100284
51. Fuladlu K: Urban Sprawl Measurement with Use of VMT Pattern: A Longitudinal Method in Case of Famagusta. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 2020, 7(5):12-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.05.003
52. Hoşkara ŞÖ, Çavuşoğlu BT, Öngül Z: Legal frameworks and housing environments in north Cyprus. METU Journal of Architecture 2009, 26(1):81-100.
53. Yorucu V, Keleş R: The construction boom and environmental protection in Northern Cyprus as a consequence of the Annan Plan. Construction Management and Economics 2007, 25(1):77-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600902356
54. State Planning Organization: KKTC 2011 Nüfus Ve Konut Sayımı [T.R.N.Cyprus 2011 Population and Housing Census]. In. Edited by İstatistik ve Araştırma Dairesi. Lefkoşa: KKTC Devlet Basımevi; 2013: 48.
55. World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health. In.; 2010.
56. European Investment Bank: JESSICA Evaluation Study for Cyprus Final Report. In. Luxembourg: Publications Office for the European Union; 2009.
57. European Commission: Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27 – Final report: Directorate-General for Environment; 2011.
58. Chiesura A: The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68(1):129-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
59. Koohsari MJ, Kaczynski AT, Giles-Corti B, Karakiewicz JA: Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough? Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 117:92-99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.020
60. Sugiyama T, Paquet C, Howard NJ, Coffee NT, Taylor AW, Adams RJ, Daniel M: Public open spaces and walking for recreation: Moderation by attributes of pedestrian environments. Preventive Medicine 2014, 62:25-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.030
61. challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning 2014, 125:234-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
62. McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D: Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place 2010, 16(4):712-726.