Research Article

Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model

Volume: 3 Number: 2 June 1, 2018
EN

Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model

Abstract

The ionosphere is a layer of atmosphere 60 km to 1100 km above the earth and is composed of solar rays and ionized gases. The ionosphere is an important layer affecting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measures. The quality of GNSS measures is directly related to the changes in the ionosphere. For this reason, monitoring changes in the ionosphere is quite important. One of the important parameters expressing the characteristic of the ionosphere is the Total Electron Content (TEC), which is a function of electron density exhibiting transformation with solar radiation. In this study, 68 stations including 56 Continuously Operating Reference Stations-Turkey (CORS-TR) stations and also IGS stations were taken for evaluation. Bernese v5.2 GNSS software developed by Bern University of Switzerland was employed at the evaluation stage. From 2009 until 2015, TEC values were calculated at two hourly intervals, one day for each month. In the study, where a Single Layer Model was used, TEC values obtained from GNSS measurements have been compared with the TEC (IRI-2012 TEC) values obtained from the global ionosphere map (GIM-TEC) and the international ionosphere reference model programme published by the Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). As a result, the regional (RIM) TEC values and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC values showed a large similarity, and the IRI obtained TEC values remained lower than these four values was observed. Correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship between regional TEC values obtained after the evaluation and global TEC values. There is a positive and quite high correlation between the regional (RIM) TEC values produced by the calculated correlation coefficients and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC and IRI TEC values.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdullah, M., Strangeways, H. J. and Walsh, D. M., 2009. Improving ambiguity resolution rate with an accurate ionospheric differential correction. Journal of Navigation, 62 (01), 151-166.
  2. Alcay, S., Yigit, C. O., Seemala, G., Ceylan, A., 2014. GPS-Based Ionosphere Modeling: A Brief Review, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23 (3a), 815-824.
  3. Arslan, N., 2004. Investigation of the effects of the ionospheric total electron content variations on the coordinates using GPS. Ph.D. Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
  4. Basciftci, F., Inal, C., Yildirim, O., Bulbul, S., 2017a. Determination of Regional TEC Values by GNSS Measurements, A Case Study: Central Anatolia Sample, Turkey. Surveying the world of tomorrow – From digitalisation to augmented reality, FIG Working Week 2017. Helsinki/Finland.
  5. Basciftci F., Inal C., Yildirim O., Bulbul S., 2017b. Determining regional ionospheric model comparing with global models. Geodetski vestnik, 61 (3), 427-440. DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2017.03.427-440.
  6. Başpınar, S. 2012. Examine Ionoshphere Models with CORS-TR Datas. Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul.
  7. Bilitza, D., Altadil, D., Zhang, Y., Mertens, C., Truhlink, V., Richards, P., Mckinnell, L., Reinish, B. 2014. The International Reference Ionosphere 2012-a model of international collaboration. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 4, A107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014004.
  8. Calais, E., Minster, J. B., 1998. GPS, Earthquakes, The Ionosphere, and Space Shuttle. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 105, 167–181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(97)00089-7.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fuat Başçiftçi *
Selcuk University, Kadinhani Vocational School of Higher Education Mapping-Cadastre Programme, Konya
0000-0002-5791-0676
Türkiye

Cevat Inal
Selçuk University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geomatic Engineering, Konya
0000-0001-8980-2074
Türkiye

Omer Yildirim This is me
Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Geomatic Engineering, Tokat
0000-0002-3537-6732
Türkiye

Sercan Bulbul
Selçuk University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geomatic Engineering, Konya
0000-0001-6066-611X
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 1, 2018

Submission Date

January 23, 2018

Acceptance Date

March 18, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Başçiftçi, F., Inal, C., Yildirim, O., & Bulbul, S. (2018). Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.382604
AMA
1.Başçiftçi F, Inal C, Yildirim O, Bulbul S. Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. IJEG. 2018;3(2):61-72. doi:10.26833/ijeg.382604
Chicago
Başçiftçi, Fuat, Cevat Inal, Omer Yildirim, and Sercan Bulbul. 2018. “Comparison of Regional and Global TEC Values: Turkey Model”. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3 (2): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.382604.
EndNote
Başçiftçi F, Inal C, Yildirim O, Bulbul S (June 1, 2018) Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3 2 61–72.
IEEE
[1]F. Başçiftçi, C. Inal, O. Yildirim, and S. Bulbul, “Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model”, IJEG, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61–72, June 2018, doi: 10.26833/ijeg.382604.
ISNAD
Başçiftçi, Fuat - Inal, Cevat - Yildirim, Omer - Bulbul, Sercan. “Comparison of Regional and Global TEC Values: Turkey Model”. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3/2 (June 1, 2018): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.382604.
JAMA
1.Başçiftçi F, Inal C, Yildirim O, Bulbul S. Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. IJEG. 2018;3:61–72.
MLA
Başçiftçi, Fuat, et al. “Comparison of Regional and Global TEC Values: Turkey Model”. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2018, pp. 61-72, doi:10.26833/ijeg.382604.
Vancouver
1.Fuat Başçiftçi, Cevat Inal, Omer Yildirim, Sercan Bulbul. Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. IJEG. 2018 Jun. 1;3(2):61-72. doi:10.26833/ijeg.382604

Cited By