Object based burned area mapping with random forest algorithm

Yıl 2019, , 78 - 87, 01.06.2019

Resul Çömert , Dilek Küçük Matcı , Uğur Avdan

https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.455595

Cited By: 33

Öz

It is very important to map the burned forest areas economically, quickly and with the high accuracy of issues such as damage assessment studies, fire risk analysis, and management of forest regeneration processes. Remote sensing methods give advantages such as fast, easy-to-use and high accuracy for burned area mapping. Recent years machine learning algorithms have become more popular in satellite image classification, due to the effective solutions for the analysis of complex datasets which have a large number of variables. In this study, the success of object based random forest algorithm was investigated for burned forest area mapping. For this purpose, Object based image analysis (OBIA) was performed using Landsat 8 image of the Adrasan and Kumluca fires which occurred in 24 – 27 June 2016. The study consisted of five steps. In the first step, the multi-resolution image segmentation was performed for obtaining image objects from Landsat 8 spectral bands. In the second step, the image object metrics such as spectral index and layer values were calculated for all image objects. In the third step, a random forest classifier model was developed. Then, the developed model applied to the test site for classification of the burned area. Finally, the obtained results evaluated with confusion matrix based on the randomly sampled points. According to the results, we obtained 0.089 commission error (CE) with 0.014 omission error (OE). An overall accuracy was obtained as 0.99. The results show that this approach is very useful to be used to determine burned forest areas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Random forest, Burned area mapping, Object based images analysis, Remote sensing

Kaynakça

• Adams, M. A. (2013). Mega-fires, tipping points and ecosystem services: Managing forests and woodlands in an uncertain future. Forest Ecology and Management, 294, 250-261.
• Banko, G. (1998). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data and of methods including remote sensing data in forest inventory.
• Barbosa, P. M., Grégoire, J.-M., & Pereira, J. M. C. (1999). An algorithm for extracting burned areas from time series of AVHRR GAC data applied at a continental scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 69(3), 253-263.
• Bastarrika, A., Chuvieco, E., & Martín, M. P. (2011). Mapping burned areas from Landsat TM/ETM+ data with a two-phase algorithm: Balancing omission and commission errors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(4), 1003-1012.
• Benz, U. C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., & Heynen, M. (2004). Multi-resolution, objectoriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GISready information. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 58(3), 239-258.
• Biau, G., Devroye, L., & Lugosi, G. (2008). Consistency of random forests and other averaging classifiers. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(Sep), 2015-2033.
• Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine learning, 24(2), 123-140.
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
• Chen, G., He, Y., De Santis, A., Li, G., Cobb, R., & Meentemeyer, R. K. (2017). Assessing the impact of emerging forest disease on wildfire using Landsat and KOMPSAT-2 data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 195, 218-229.
• Chen, W., Li, X., Wang, Y., Chen, G., & Liu, S. (2014). Forested landslide detection using LiDAR data and the random forest algorithm: A case study of the Three Gorges, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 291-301.
• Chuvieco, E., Martin, M. P., & Palacios, A. (2002). Assessment of different spectral indices in the red-nearinfrared spectral domain for burned land discrimination. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(23), 5103- 5110.
• Dey, V., Zhang, Y., & Zhong, M. (2010). A review on image segmentation techniques with remote sensing perspective: na.
• Díaz-Uriarte, R., & De Andres, S. A. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC bioinformatics, 7(1), 3.
• Dillon, G. K., Holden, Z. A., Morgan, P., Crimmins, M. A., Heyerdahl, E. K., & Luce, C. H. (2011). Both topography and climate affected forest and woodland burn severity in two regions of the western US, 1984 to 2006. Ecosphere, 2(12), 1-33.
• Dimitriou, A., Mantakas, G., & Kouvelis, S. (2001). An analysis of key issues that underlie forest fires and shape subsequent fire management strategies in 12 countries in the Mediterranean basin. Final report prepared by Alcyon for WWF Mediterranean Programme Office and IUCN.
• Epting, J., Verbyla, D., & Sorbel, B. (2005). Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3), 328-339.
• Escuin, S., Navarro, R., & Fernandez, P. (2008). Fire severity assessment by using NBR (Normalized Burn Ratio) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) derived from LANDSAT TM/ETM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(4), 1053- 1073.
• Estoque, R. C., Murayama, Y., & Akiyama, C. M. (2015). Pixel-based and object-based classifications using highand medium-spatial-resolution imageries in the urban and suburban landscapes. Geocarto International, 30(10), 1113-1129.
• Filippidis, E., & Mitsopoulos, I. (2004). Mapping forest fire risk zones based on historical fire data in Mount Olympus, Greece, using geographical information systems. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 77.
• Flannigan, M. D., & Haar, T. V. (1986). Forest fire monitoring using NOAA satellite AVHRR. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16(5), 975-982.
• Fraser, R., Li, Z., & Cihlar, J. (2000). Hotspot and NDVI differencing synergy (HANDS): A new technique for burned area mapping over boreal forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74(3), 362-376.
• Gao, Y., Mas, J. F., Kerle, N., & Pacheco, J. A. N. (2011). Optimal region growing segmentation and its effect on classification accuracy. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(13), 3747-3763.
• Giglio, L., Loboda, T., Roy, D. P., Quayle, B., & Justice, C. O. (2009). An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(2), 408-420.
• Gilbertson, J. K., Kemp, J., & van Niekerk, A. (2017). Effect of pan-sharpening multi-temporal Landsat 8 imagery for crop type differentiation using different classification techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 134, 151-159.
• Gislason, P. O., Benediktsson, J. A., & Sveinsson, J. R. (2006). Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(4), 294-300.
• Ham, J., Chen, Y., Crawford, M. M., & Ghosh, J. (2005). Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(3), 492-501.
• Hernandez, C., Drobinski, P., & Turquety, S. (2015). How much does weather control fire size and intensity in the Mediterranean region? Annales Geophysicae, 33(7), 931-939.
• Holden, Z. A., Morgan, P., & Evans, J. S. (2009). A predictive model of burn severity based on 20-year satellite-inferred burn severity data in a large southwestern US wilderness area. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(11), 2399-2406.
• Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1), 195-213.
• Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295- 309. Ishwaran, H. (2007). Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 1, 519-537.
• Key, C., & Benson, N. (2006). Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index. Pages LA8–LA15 in DC Lutes, editor. FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
• Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling (Vol. 26): Springer.
• Loboda, T., O'neal, K., & Csiszar, I. (2007). Regionally adaptable dNBR-based algorithm for burned area mapping from MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 109(4), 429-442.
• Louppe, G., Wehenkel, L., Sutera, A., & Geurts, P. (2013). Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. Paper presented at the Advances in neural information processing systems.
• Meinshausen, N. (2006). Quantile regression forests. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(Jun), 983-999.
• Meng, R., Wu, J., Schwager, K. L., Zhao, F., Dennison, P. E., Cook, B. D., . . . Serbin, S. P. (2017). Using high spatial resolution satellite imagery to map forest burn severity across spatial scales in a Pine Barrens ecosystem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191, 95-109.
• Mitrakis, N. E., Mallinis, G., Koutsias, N., & Theocharis, J. B. (2012). Burned area mapping in Mediterranean environment using medium-resolution multi-spectral data and a neuro-fuzzy classifier. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 3(4), 299-318.
• Neyisci, T., Sirin, G., Bas, M. N., & Saribasak, H. (2016). Antalya - kumluca ve adrasan orman yanginlari hakkinda rapor.
• Palandjian, D., Gitas, I. Z., & Wright, R. (2009). Burned area mapping and post-fire impact assessment in the Kassandra peninsula (Greece) using Landsat TM and Quickbird data. Geocarto International, 24(3), 193-205.
• Pereira, J. M. (1999). A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(1), 217-226.
• Petropoulos, G. P., Kontoes, C., & Keramitsoglou, I. (2011). Burnt area delineation from a uni-temporal perspective based on Landsat TM imagery classification using support vector machines. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(1), 70-80.
• Petropoulos, G. P., Vadrevu, K. P., Xanthopoulos, G., Karantounias, G., & Scholze, M. (2010). A comparison of spectral angle mapper and artificial neural network classifiers combined with Landsat TM imagery analysis for obtaining burnt area mapping. Sensors, 10(3), 1967- 1985.
• Phiri, D., & Morgenroth, J. (2017). Developments in Landsat Land Cover Classification Methods: A Review. Remote Sensing, 9(9).
• Pinty, B., & Verstraete, M. (1992). GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Plant ecology, 101(1), 15-20.
• Ramo, R., & Chuvieco, E. (2017). Developing a Random Forest Algorithm for MODIS Global Burned Area Classification. Remote Sensing, 9(11), 1193.
• Schepers, L., Haest, B., Veraverbeke, S., Spanhove, T., Vanden Borre, J., & Goossens, R. (2014). Burned area detection and burn severity assessment of a heathland fire in Belgium using airborne imaging spectroscopy (APEX). Remote Sensing, 6(3), 1803-1826.
• Smith, A., Drake, N., Wooster, M., Hudak, A., Holden, Z., & Gibbons, C. (2007). Production of Landsat ETM+ reference imagery of burned areas within Southern African savannahs: comparison of methods and application to MODIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(12), 2753-2775.
• Stumpf, A., & Kerle, N. (2011). Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(10), 2564-2577.
• Trigg, S., & Flasse, S. (2001). An evaluation of different bi-spectral spaces for discriminating burned shrubsavannah. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(13), 2641-2647.
• Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127-150.
• Vallejo, V. R., Arianoutsou, M., & Moreira, F. (2012). Fire ecology and post-fire restoration approaches in Southern European forest types. In Post-fire management and restoration of southern European forests (pp. 93- 119): Springer.
• Varamesh, S., Hosseini, S. M., & Rahimzadegan, M. (2017). Comparison of Conventional and Advanced Classification Approaches by Landsat-8 Imagery. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(3), 1407-1416.
• Wilson, E. H., & Sader, S. A. (2002). Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(3), 385-396.
• Zhang, Y. (2002). A new automatic approach for effectively fusing Landsat 7 as well as IKONOS images. Paper presented at the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002. IGARSS'02. 2002 IEEE International.