The deformation analysis using hypothesis tests

Abstract

There are temporary or permanent physical changes depending on time in earth surface. These physical changes named as deformation. The magnitude and direction of the deformation effect must be measured and controlled. The geodetic deformation network is established to determine the deformation movements and the deformation measurements are made. Then, the point coordinates are calculated used the free network adjustment. So, the different point coordinates were obtained according to measured time. The difference of point coordinate must be test to decide as significant or insignificant. Thus, the significance test based hypothesis test can be made. In this study, deformation network was established in Toybelen village of Samsun province and the deformation measurements were made periodically. The deformation network was create with using 15 points and one of these point is the control point. This deformation network measured in two periods used the global positioning system. Evaluation was made using the Topcon program and point coordinates were obtained. Differences in point coordinates received and these differences were significant tested. The program written in the matlab program was used for this test. Finally, coordinate values compared in two periods and movement points have been identified.

Keywords

• Deformation
• Hypothesis Tests
• Significant Tests
• Outlier Measurement Tests

References

1. Altıntaş F. (2014). Gümüşhane –Trabzon Hattı Boyunca Yerkabuğu Hareketlerinin GNSS Verileri İle İzlenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Gümüşhane.
2. Bayrak T. (2003). Heyelanlar için Bir Dinamik Deformasyon ve Bir Dinamik Hareket Yüzeyi Modelinin Oluşturulması, Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
3. Demir E. (2017). İstatistik Ders Notları [PDF belgesi]. Online Web site: 12 Temmuz 2018 tarihinde http://www.academia.edu/30931820/Istatistik_Ders_Not larim_E.Demir_2017_.pdf adresinden erişildi.
4. Heunecke O., Welsch W. (2000). Terminology and Classification of Deformation Models in Engineering Surveys, Journal of Geospatial Engineering, Vol. 2, No.1, pp.35-44, Hong Kong.
5. Kaplan M.O., Ayan T., Erol S. (2004). The Effects of Geodetic Configuration of the Network in Deformation Analysis, FIG Working Week 2004 Athens, Greece, May 22-27, 2004.
6. Setan H.,Singh R. (2001). Deformation Analysis Of A Geodetic Monitoring Network, Geomatica. Vol. 55, No. 3.
7. Tanır E. (2000). Deformasyon Analizinde Statik Değerlendirme Yöntemleri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
8. Tanır Kayıkçı E., Yalçınkaya M. (2012). Determination of Horizontal Movements by Static Deformation Models: A Case Study on the Mining Area, Experimental Techniques 39 (2015) 70–81.

9. Ünver Ö.,Gamgam H.,Altunkaynak B. (2015). Temel İstatistik Yöntemler, Seçkin Yayınevi.
10. Yalçınkaya M., Bayrak T. (2004). Comparison of Static and Dynamic Geodetic Deformation Models for Kutlugün Landsline in Northeastern Turkey, Natural Hazards (2005) 34: 91–110.