The global and local robustness analysis in geodetic networks

Abstract

The geodetic networks should be able to detect the possible earth crust movements caused by active tectonic movements in Turkey. Geodetic networks should also be able to determine the crust movements accurately as well as provide precision and reliability requests. The capacity of geodetic networks to determine the crustal movements can be determined by sensitivity analysis. Robustness analysis consists of strengthening internal reliability analysis with strain techniques. Robustness is defined as the deformation strength induced by the maximum undetectable errors with the internal reliability analysis. The robustness of a geodetic network is determined by the global initial condition, which aims at minimizing the total displacement value in the network. In this study, the local initial condition that aims to minimize the total displacement value at the uniform polyhedron, which consists of observations from each station points. The displacement values obtained according to the local and the global initial conditions are compared with threshold values. The results have also been interpreted.

Keywords

• Sensitivity
• Strain
• Reliability
• Geodetic Networks
• Robustness
• Robustness

References

1. Berber M., (2006), Robustness analysis of geodetic networks, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Brunswick, Canada.
2. Chou P.C., Pagano, N.J., (1992), Elasticity Elasticity. Tensor, Dyadic and Engineering Approaches, ISBN 0486669580.
3. Hsu R., Hsiao K., (2002), Pre-computing the sensitivity of a GPS station for crustal deformation monitoring, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 25(6), 715-722.
4. Kirici Yildirim, U., Sisman, Y., (2019), The deformation Analysis using hypothesis tests, International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences (IJEG), 4(2), 88-93.
5. Konak H., (2010), Jeodezik ağlar ve uygulamaları ders notları, KOÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi, Kocaeli.
6. Konak H., Küreç Nehbit P., İnce C. D., (2017), Yaşamsal altyapı sistemlerinin GPS ağlarıyla izlenmesi ve deformasyon sonuçlarının yorumlanması: Kocaeli İZDOGAP GPS ağı uygulaması, Geomatik Dergisi, 2(1), 40-52.
7. Konak H., (2018), Jeodezik ağlarda sağlamlık ders notları, KOÜ, FBE, Joedezi ve Jeoinformasyon Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı.
8. Kuang, S., (1991), Optimization and design of deformation monitoring schemes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Surveying Engineering Technical Report, University of New Brunswick, 157, 1991.

9. Küreç P., (2010), Yüzey ağlarının değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, KOÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
10. Küreç P., Konak H., (2011), Sıklaştırma ağlarının yer kabuğu hareketlerine karşı duyarlıkları ve olası algılayabilirlik düzeyleri, hkm Jeodezi, Jeoinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 84-90.
11. Küreç P., Konak H., (2014), A priori sensitivity analysis for densification GPS networks and their capacities of crustal deformation monitoring: a real GPS network application, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1299-1308.
12. Küreç Nehbit P., (2018), GPS/GNSS ağları için sürekli bir gerinim izleme ve kalite değerlendirme stratejisi, Doktora Tezi, KOÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
13. Öcalan, T., (2018), Investihation on the effects of number of common points in 2D transformation problem, International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences (IJEG), 4(2), 58-62.
14. Poyraz F., (2009), Kuzey Anadolu fay zonu doğu kesiminde yatay yerkabuğu hareketleri ve gerilme birikiminin araştırılması, Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Istanbul.
15. Vanicek P., Craymer M. R., Krakiwsky E. J., (2001), Robustness Analysis of Geodetic Horizontal Networks, Journal of Geodesy, 75(4), 199-209.
16. Vanicek P., Krakiwsky E. J., Craymer M. R., Gao Y., Ong P. S., (1990), Robustness Analysis, Final contract report, Department of Surveying Engineering Technical Report, University of New Brunswick, 156.