Determining the habitat fragmentation thru geoscience capabilities in Turkey: A case study of wildlife refuges

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 104 - 116, 01.07.2021

Arif Oğuz Altunel , Sadık Çağlar , Tayyibe Açıkgöz Altunel

https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.712549

Cited By: 5

Öz

Technical forest management started 180 years ago in Turkey, during which time there have been various approaches and policy changes. The primary objective of forestry has been considered as timber production, so the intangible benefits have never been given the proper attention they deserve. The majority of Turkey’s wildlife has prospered within the forest ecosystems. This situation has gradually led to a change of status, so some forests and land areas have been reassigned with the conservation agendas as the primary purpose; however timber production has never slowed down. Thus, operational forestry practices, such as roading, logging, etc., have kept on exploiting these lands to their full extent despite their conservation statuses. In Turkey and anywhere else, since forestry has always evolved around extracting the timber out of the forest lands, the accessibility has long been provided, building roads to take related services to forested ecosystems. The remnants of these roads, along with the more standardized new ones can be found everywhere, regardless of the land status. Such expansion has resulted in habitat fragmentation emerging as a major threat for the protected areas. In this study, the expansion of all-weather and dry-weather accessible roads and suburban spread was examined in two adjacent, Ilgaz and Gavurdagi, wildlife refuges for the years of 1960, 1993, 2010 and 2019, relying heavily on the mapping, geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing. It was found that 275.5 km dry-weather roads in 1960 rose to 700 km in 2017, which meant 254% increase. Additionally, when the core along with the surrounding 3000 m buffer area was considered, 51 km all-weather roads in 1960 increased almost four and a half times by 2019. Suburban expansion was relatively stable inside the core area but had almost quadrupled within the surrounding areas, exposing the refuges to more people. These findings indicated that the wildlife habitats of Turkey are fragmented and under heavy human pressure.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fragmentation, Roading, Suburban expansion, Geographic Information Systems, Landsat

Kaynakça

• Akay A E, Wing M G, Sivrikaya F & Sakar D (2012). A GIS-based decision support system for determining the shortest and safest route to forest fires: a case study in Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 1391-1407. DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2049-z
• Al-Chokhachy R, Black T A, Thomas C, Luce C H, Rieman B, Cissel R, Carlson A, Hendricson S, Archer E K & Kerhner J L (2016). Linkages between unpaved forest roads and streambed sediment: why context matters in directing road restoration. Restoration Ecology, 24(5): 589-598.
• Amil T A (2018). Determining of different inundated land use in Salyan plain during 2010 the Kura river flood through GIS and remote sensing tools. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(3), 80-86. DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.412348
• Amin A & Fazal S (2017). Assessment of forest fragmentation in district of Shopian using multitemporal land cover (A GIS Approach). Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 5(1), 12-23. DOI:10.12691/jgg-5-1-2
• Araujo H A, Page A, Cooper A B, Venditti J, MacIsaac E, Hassan M A & Knowler D (2014). Modelling changes in suspended sediment from forest road surface in a coastal watershed of British Columbia. Hydrological Processes, 28, 4914-4927. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9989
• Ascensao F, Lucas P S, Costa A & Bager A (2017). The effects of roads on edge permeability and movement patterns for small mammals: A case study with Montane Akodont. Landscape Ecology, 32, 781-790. DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0485-z
• Bakirman T & Gumusay M U (2020). Integration of custom street view and low cost motion sensor. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 5(2), 66-72. DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.589489
• Bartakova V, Reichard M, Blazek R, Polacik M & Bryja J (2015). Terrestrial fishes: rivers are barriers to gene flow in annual fishes from the African savanna. Journal of Biogeography 42: 1832-1844. DOI:10.1111/jbi.12567
• Bekiroglu S, Destan S, Can M, Turkoglu T & Tolunay A (2015). Econometric analysis of a forest recreation area: An Example from Istanbul, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24(9a), 2937-2945.
• Bischof R B, Steyaert S M J G & Kindberg J (2017). Caught in the mesh: roads and their networkscale impediment to animal movement. Ecography, 40, 1369-1380. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02801
• Boluk G & Mert M (2015). The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138
• Boston K (2016). The potential effects of forest roads on the environment and mitigating their impacts. Current Forestry Reports, 2, 215-222. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-016-0044-x
• Bussotti F, Pollastrini M, Holland V & Brüggemann W (2015). Functional traits and adaptive capacity of European forests to climate change. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 111, 91-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.11.006
• Caliskan E (2013). Environmental impacts of forest road construction on mountainous terrain. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 10, 23, DOI: 10.1186/1735-274610-23.
• Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, Hyde T & Kenter J O (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012
• Coffin A W (2007). From roadkill to road ecology: A review of the ecological effects of roads. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 396-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.006
• Crooks K R, Burdett C L, Theobald D M, King S R B, Di Marco M Rondinini C & Boitani L (2017). Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(29): 7635-7640. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705769114
• Dambros C S, Caceres N C, Magnus L & Gotelli N J (2015). Effects of neutrality, geometric constraints, climate and habitat quality on species richness and composition of Atlantic Forest small mammals. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 1084-1093. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12330
• Demir M & Hasdemir M (2005). Functional Planning Criterion of Forest Network Systems According to Recent Forestry Development and Suggestions in Turkey. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(1), 22-28.
• Di Gironimo G, Balsamo A, Esposito G, Lanzotti A, Melemez K & Spinelli R (2015). Simulation of forest harvesting alternative processes and concept design of an innovative skidding winch focused on productivity improvement. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, 350-359. DOI: 10.3906/tar-1408-64
• Edwards P J, Wood F & Quinlivan R L (2016). Effectiveness of Best Management Practices that Have Application to Forest Roads: A Literature Synthesis. United States Department of Agriculture, General Technical Report NRS-163, Forest Service Northern Research Station.
• Eken G, Isfendiyaroglu S, Yeniyurt C, Erkol I L, Karatas A & Ataol M (2016). Identifying key biodiversity areas in Turkey: a multi-taxon approach. Internatioal Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12(3): 181-190. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2016.1182949
• Erturk A (2017). Research on the Spatial Ecology and Population Structure of Anatolian Canis lupus L. 1758 (gray wolf). PhD dissertation, Hacettepe University, in Turkish.
• Evcin O, Kucuk O & Akturk E (2019). Habitat suitability model with maximum entropy approach for European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Black Sea Region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191: 669. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7853-x
• Fahrig L (2002). Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: A Synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12(2), 346-353.
• Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A, Clevenger A P, Cutshall C D, Dale V H, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman C R, Heanue K, Jones J A, Swanson F J, Turrentine T & Winter T C (2002). Road Ecology, Science and Solutions, Island Press. ISBN: 978-1559639330
• Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H & Jonsson P R (2008). Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology, 89(5), 1223-1231. DOI: 10.1890/06-2091.1
• Geffen E, Anderson M J & Wayne R K (2004). Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2481-2490. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02244.x
• Haack B, Bryant N & Adams S (1987). An assessment of Landsat MSS and TM Data for urban and near-urban land-cover digital classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21(2), 201-213. DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90053-8
• Haddad N M, Brudvig L A, Clobert J, Davies K F et al. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Applied Ecology 1(2), e1500052.
• Hanacek K & Rodriguez-Labajos B (2018). Impacts of land-use and management changes on cultural agroecosystem services and environmental conflicts—A global review. Global Environmental Change, 50, 41-59.
• Hawbaker T J & Radeloff V C (2004). Roads and landscape pattern in Northern Wisconsin based on a comparison of four road data sources. Conservation Biology, 18(5): 1233-1244. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00231.x
• Heilman Jr. G E, Strittholt J R, Slosser N C & Dellesala D A (2002). Forest fragmentation of the conterminous Unites States: Assessing forest intactness through road density and spatial characteristics, BioScience, 52(5): 411-422.
• Jangi M N, Noori G, Karami M & Jangi A N (2019). Threatening and destructing factors associated with the habitat of francolin in Sistan region (Case study: Jazinak corridor). International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,16: 1967-1972. DOI 10.1007/s13762-017-1614-6
• Jones J Smith R, Jost G, Winkler R et al. (2018). Summary of the Forests and Water Workshop. Journal of Watershed Management, 2(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.22230/jwsm.2018v2n1a1
• Karakus P, Karabork H & Kaya S (2017). A comparison of the classification accuracies in determining the land cover of Kadirli region of Turkey by using the pixel based and object based classification algorithms. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(02), 52-60. DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.298951
• Kaya Z & Raynal D J (2001). Biodiversity and conservation of Turkish forests. Biological Conservation, 97, 131-141.
• Laurance W F & Balmford A (2013). A global map for road building. Nature, 495, 308-309.
• Le H L, Miyagi T, Shinro A & Hamasaki E (2016). Landslide typology using a morphological approach and establishment of an inventory map based on aerial photo interpretation in Central Vietnam. Geomorphology and Society, Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Tokyo. 149-163.
• Li C, Wang J, Wang L, Hu L & Gong P (2014). Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. Remote Sensing, 6, 964-983. DOI: 10.3390/rs6020964
• Litvaitis J A, Reed G C, Carroll R P, Litvaitis M K, Tash J, Mahard T, Broman D J A, Callahan C & Ellingwood M (2015). Bobcats (Lynx rufus) as a Model Organism to Investigate the effects of Roads on Wide-Ranging Carnivores. Environmental Management, 55(6): 1366-1376. DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0468-2
• Liu S, Dong Y, Deng L, Liu Q, Zhao H & Dong S (2014). Forest fragmentation and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension and city expansion: A case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecological Indicators, 36, 160-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.018
• Lugo A E & Gucinski H (2000). Function, effects and management of forest roads. Forest Ecology and Management, 133(3), 249-262. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00237-6
• Lundmark T, Bergh J, Hofer P, Lundström A, Nordin A, Poudel B C, Sathre R, Taverna R & Werner F (2014). Potential Roles of Swedish Forestry in the Context of Climate Change Mitigation. Forests, 5(4), 557-578. DOI: 10.3390/f5040557
• Machado A P, Clement L, Uva V, Goudet J & Roulin A (2018). The Rocky Mountains as a dispersal barrier between barn owl (Tyto alba) populations in North America. Journal of Biogeography, 45, 1288-1300. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13219
• Martinig A R & Belanger-Smith K (2016). Factor influencing the discovery and use of wildlife passages for small fauna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 825-836. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12616
• Milodowski D T, Mudd S M & Mitchard E T A (2015). Erosion rates as a potential bottom-up control of forest structural characteristics in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Ecology, 96(1), 31-38. DOI: 10.1890/14-0649.1
• Moravetz D (1977). Twenty-five Years of Economic Development 1950-1975. The World Bank, Report #10098, 125 p.
• Ocak S (2016). Transhumance in Central Anatolia: A resilient interdepence between biological and cultural diversity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29, 439-453. DOI 10.1007/s10806-016-9613-z
• OGM (2008). Notification on the drafting, construction and maintenance of forest road, Notification # 292. Environment and Forestry Ministery, Forest Service (OGM): Ankara, Turkey, in Turkish, 338 p.
• Ortega Y K & Capen D E (1999). Effects of Forest Roads on Habitat Quality for Ovenbirds in a Forested Landscape. The Auk, 116(4), 937-946.
• OSIB (2012). Ilgaz Wildlife Refuge Administration and Development Plan, Kastamonu Sub-branch, Region 10 Directorate, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Kastamonu, Turkey, (in Turkish), 151 p.
• OSIB (2015). Kastamonu Tosya Gavurdagi Wildlife Refuge Administration and Development Plan, Kastamonu Sub-branch, Region 10 Directorate, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Kastamonu, Turkey, (in Turkish), 133 p.
• Sefercik U G & Atesoglu A (2013). Uydu Verileri Kullanarak Meşcere Boyu Belirlenmesine Yönelik Yeni Bir Yaklaşım, TUFUAB 6thTechnical Symposium, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish)
• Sekercioglu C H, Anderson S, Akcay E, Bilgin R, Can O E et al. (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biological Conservation, 144(12), 2752-2769. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.025
• Skole D & Tucker C (1993). Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988. Science, 260(5116), 1905-1910. DOI: 10.1126/science.260.5116.1905
• Soyumert A (2010). Determining large mammal species and their ecology via the camera trap methods in Northwestern Anatolian Forests. PhD dissertation, Hacettepe University. (in Turkish).
• Soyumert A (2020). Camera-trapping two felid species: Monitoring Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) and wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in mixed temperate forest ecosystems. Mammal Study, 45(1), 41-48. DOI: 10.3106/ms2019-0046
• Soyumert A, Erturk A & Tavsanoglu C (2019). The importance of lagomorphs for the Eurasian lynx in Western Asia: Results from a large scale camera-trapping survey in Turkey. Mammalian Biology, 95: 18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2019.01.003
• Suleiman M S, Wasonga O V, Mbau J S & Elhadi Y A (2017). Spatial and temporal analysis of forest cover change in Falgore Game Reserve in Kano, Nigeria. Ecological Processes, 6(11): DOI: 10.1186/s13717-017-0078-4
• Torres A, Jaeger J A G & Alonso J C (2016). Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(30): 8472-8477.
• Towerton A L, Kavanagh R P, Penman T D & Dickman C R (2016). Ranging behavior and movements of the red fox in remnant forest habitats. Wildlife Research, 43, 492-506. DOI: 10.1071/WR15203
• Turk Y & Gumus S (2017). Evaluation of the tender results of forest road constructions: A case study in Bolu Regional Directorate. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University 67(2), 194-202.
• URL-1. (2018). “Noah’s Ark” National Biodiversity Database, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Geographical Information Systems, Available online at: http://www.nuhungemisi.gov.tr/Giris/indexen.aspx, Accessed date: 27.05.2020.
• URL-2. (2020). Environmental Performance Index, Biodiversity & Habitat, Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Available online at: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/epi/sets/browse, Accessed date: 06.06.2020.
• URL-3. (2020). Conservation Areas of Turkey”, Available online at: http://www.kursatozcan.com/korunan_alanlar/, Accessed date: 30.05.2020
• USGS. (2020). Earth Explorer data portal, USGS, Available online at: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/, Accessed date: 07.04.2020.
• Wang Y, Guan L, Chen J & Kong Y (2018). Influences on mammals frequency of use of small bridges and culverts along the Qinghai-Tibet railway, China. Ecological Research, 33, 879-887. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-018-1578-0
• Won H K, Jeon H S, Han H, Lee S J & Jung B H (2017). Combining Timber Production and Wood Processing for Increasing Forestry Income: A Case Study of 6th Industrialization in Korean Forestry. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 33(4): 355-360. DOI: 10.7747/JFES.2017.33.4.355
• Wulder M A & Masek J G (2012). Landsat Legacy Special Issue: Continuing the Landsat Legacy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122, 1.
• Yildiz O, Sarginci M, Esen D & Cromack Jr K (2007). Effects of vegetation control on nutrient removal and Fagus orientalis, Lipsky regeneration in the western Black Sea Regin of Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management, 240, 186-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.018