Evaluating Ecological Knowledge for the Conservation of Freshwater Mussels in Türkiye

Abstract

Freshwater mussels are vital components of aquatic ecosystems, playing a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Despite their importance, freshwater mussels face numerous threats globally. This study evaluates the awareness and ecological knowledge of local populations regarding freshwater mussels in three distinct regions of Turkey: the Central Black Sea, Northeastern Anatolia, and Eastern Anatolia. A total of 164 face-to-face interviews were conducted between 2022 and 2024 using a stratified cluster sampling design. The study aimed to assess knowledge about both native and non-native mussel species and analyze the factors influencing this knowledge. Results showed that 83.53% of participants were aware of freshwater mussels, with significant variations based on demographic factors such as gender, age, and residence. Local residents, particularly in rural areas, demonstrated higher awareness levels. The study also revealed a potential loss of traditional ecological knowledge regarding native Unionid mussels, especially among younger generations. These findings highlight the importance of integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) with scientific ecological knowledge (SEK) in conservation efforts. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for new forms of ecological knowledge acquisition, preservation of traditional knowledge, and the development of targeted education programs to raise awareness about the ecological importance of freshwater mussels.

Keywords

• freshwater mussel
• local ecological knowledge
• interview
• conservation

References

1. Atasaral, Ş., Khan, U., Terzi, Y., Seyhan, K. (2020). Mussel: a potential pollution indicator in the aquatic ecosystem and effect of climate change. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7(3), 300-304.
2. Bélisle, A. C., Asselin, H., LeBlanc, P., Gauthier, S. (2018). Local knowledge in ecological modeling. Ecology and Society, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09949-230214
3. Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010
4. Cao, Y., Liu, X.-J., Wü, R., Xue, T., Li, L., Zhou, C., Ouyang, S., Wu, X. (2018). Conservation of the endangered freshwater mussel Solenaia carinata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in China. Nature Conservation, 26, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation .26.25334
5. Cuttelod, A., Seddon, M., Neubert, E. (2011). European red list of non-marine molluscs (p. 97). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
6. Ferreira‐Rodríguez, N. (2022). New forms of ecological knowledge acquisition for freshwater mussels’ conservation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.06.506734 Ferreira‐Rodríguez, N., Akiyama, Y., Aksenova, O. V., Araújo, R., Barnhart, M. C., Bespalaya, Y. V., … Vaughn, C. C. (2019). Research priorities for freshwater mussel conservation assessment. Biological Conservation, 231, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.002
7. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mingorría, S., Reyes‐García, V., Calvet, L., Montes, C. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 721-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x Haag, W. R. (2012). North American freshwater mussels: natural history, ecology, and conservation. Cambridge University Press.
8. Huntington, H. P., R. S. Suydam D. H. Rosemberg. 2004. Traditional knowledge and satellite tracking as complementary approaches to ecological understanding. Environmental Conservation, 31: 177-180.

9. Inglis, J. T. (Ed.). (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge: Concepts and cases. International Development Research Centre.
10. Joa, B., Winkel, G., Primmer, E. (2018). The unknown known – a review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation. Land Use Policy, 79, 520-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2018.09.001
11. Liu, X., Wü, R., Xu, C., Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Ouyang, S., … Wu, X. (2019). Effects of dams and their environmental impacts on the genetic diversity and connectivity of freshwater mussel populations in poyang lake basin, china. Freshwater Biology, 65(2), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13419
12. Lopes-Lima, M. (2015). Perspectives on Current Knowledge and Conservation of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). PQDT-Global.
13. Österling, M., Larsen, B. M., Arvidsson, B. (2020). Demonstrating the practical impact of studies on biotic interactions and adaptation of a threatened unionoid mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) to its host fish (Salmo trutta). Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(9), 1803-1808. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3428.
14. Padilha, J., Teixeira, A., Sousa, R. (2024). Uniting science and local ecological knowledge to address a recent invasion in a protected area. Preprint, Under Review
15. Pandolfo, T. J. (2024). Thermal threats to freshwater mussels: An empirical stream assessment. Diversity, 16(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010037
16. Pfeiffer, J. M., DuBose, T. P., Keogh, S. M. (2022). Synthesis of natural history collections data reveals patterns of US freshwater mussel diversity and decline. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.22.509037
17. Poizat, G. E. Baran. 1997. Fishermen's knowledge as background information in tropical fish ecology: a quantitative comparison with fish sampling results. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 50: 435-449.
18. Rasmussen, J. B. (2023). Advancing environmental justice through the integration of traditional ecological knowledge into environmental policy. Challenges, 14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe14010006
19. Reyes‐García, V., Vadez, V., Tanner, S., McDade, T. W., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R. (2006). Evaluating indices of traditional ecological knowledge: a methodological contribution. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-21
20. Sousa, R., Teixeira, A., Benaissa, H., Varandas, S., Ghamizi, M., Lopes‐Lima, M. (2019). Refuge in the Sāqya: Irrigation canals as habitat for one of the world's 100 most threatened species. Biological Conservation, 238, 108209. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biocon.2019.108209
21. Sousa, R., Zając, T., Halabowski, D., Aksenova, O. V., Bespalaya, Y. V., Carvalho, F., ... Aldridge, D. C. (2023). A roadmap for the conservation of freshwater mussels in Europe. Conservation Biology, 37(2), e13994.
22. Souther, S., Colombo, S., Lyndon, N. (2023). Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into us public land management: knowledge gaps and research priorities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.988126
23. Strayer, D. L. (2008). Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance (Vol. 1). Univ of California Press.