Automated Digitization and Integration of Legacy Geophysical Maps: A Reproducible Python Workflow for Analog Archive Recovery Applied to the Southern Marmara Sea, Türkiye
Abstract
In many national geophysical surveys performed during the period from the 1950s to the 1990s, large analog archives are still not accessible to modern analysis techniques because of their printed, non-digital form. This paper presents a Python-based, fully automated workflow for the systematic digitization, georeferencing, and multi-source integration of legacy gravity and magnetic survey maps, applied to a critical geophysical archive in the southern Marmara Sea region of Turkey. The study analyzes 27 printed maps, including 15 gravity and 12 magnetic maps, from 1972 to 2000, created by three different agencies (MTA General Directorate, C&K Petroleum, Norexplo Consultant) using two self-developed Python modules. The fully digitized database contains 24,510 Bouguer gravity measurements (86 survey lines) and 25,230 reduced-to-pole (RTP) magnetic measurements (87 survey lines), amounting to 49,740 integrated data points. Cross-validation for the gravity data set gives r = 0.9996 and RMS = 0.426 mGal, and for the magnetic data set r = 0.9991 and RMS = 7.485 nT, with mean residuals close to zero in both cases, indicating the absence of systematic errors. The reconstructed Bouguer gravity field varies from −37.47 to +74.01 mGal, and the RTP magnetic field from 746.5 to 2085.6 nT over the study area (27.0–29.4°E, 40.2–40.7°N), resolving anomaly patterns at a resolution of 150-200 m, roughly 10-20 times higher than the resolution of global maps available so far. The spatial coverage is above 99% for both data sets. The workflow reaches an accuracy of 94-97% in contour recognition and saves up to 80-90% of processing time compared to manual digitization. The fully open-source Python code is made available for the reproducible recovery of printed archives on a global scale.
Keywords
References
- Aktaş G, Hisarlı ZM, Demirel AS (2023) Interpretation of the tectonic structure of Gemlik Bay using magnetic data. Tectonophysics 863:229981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229981
- Ateş A, Kayıran T, Sincer I (2003) Structural interpretation of the Marmara region, NW Turkey, from aeromagnetic, seismic and gravity data. Tectonophysics 367:41–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00044-1
- Aygün MA, (2025). Investigation of The Structural Elements of The South of The Marmara Sea By Integrated Geophysical Methods (PhD Thesis). Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Aygün, M. A., and Demirel, A. S. (2024). Imagıng the Crustal Structure of the Southern Marmara Region (Turkey) Using Aeromagnetic and Gravitational Data. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 11(4), 101-108. https://izlik.org/JA49CY77MX
- Balmino, G., Vales, N., Bonvalot, S., & Briais, A. (2012). Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies. Journal of Geodesy, 86(6), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4
- Bhattacharyya, B. K., & Chan, K. C. (1977). Computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to inhomogeneous distribution of magnetization and density in a localized region. Geophysics, 42(3), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440731
- Bingham RG, Bodart JF, Durand G et al. (2021) Inferring ice-sheet geometry from acoustic returns from the bed of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 126:e2021JF006242.
- Demirel AS, Alp H, Alpar B, Vardar D (2021) Discussion of the fault models of the northern Marmara shelf and the lagoon Küçükçekmece with new marine magnetic data, Turkey. Thalassas 37:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00275-7
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Geological Sciences and Engineering (Other), Physical Geography and Environmental Geology (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
June 19, 2026
Submission Date
March 24, 2026
Acceptance Date
April 30, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 2
