Short Communication

Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications

Volume: 6 Number: 1 April 12, 2019
EN

Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications

Abstract

Photogrammetry is a map production technique or science applied by measurements made from terrestrial images with terrestrial cameras or more commonly used images taken with airborne cameras. With the development of technology, digital photogrammetry has been widely adopted in almost all areas of mapping. Especially digital orthophotos and digital elevation models, which are photogrammetric products, are being intensively utilized by the private sector due to their easy interpretability. Digital photogrammetry is also a good method to automatically collect digital elevation models. Digital elevation model production is an important process in photogrammetry. A digital elevation model is an important product by itself as well as plays an important role in creating products such as orthophoto. The geometrical accuracy of digital elevation model used in geomatics applications is of even greater importance. In this study, three different digital elevation models were produced using digital aerial photographs of 7 cm, 15 cm and 25 cm ground sample distance taken in 2011 of Aksaray University campus area. Then, by using the heights measured by GPS and read the same heights from the digital elevation model, root mean square errors of ground control points, check points and tie points were calculated and compared with recommended standards. When the results are examined, it is seen that the values were close to and below the recommended values. Therefore, it can be seen that the digital elevation models produced with the aerial photographs taken at 7, 15 and 25 cm ground sample distances can be used for studies that do not require. 

Keywords

References

  1. ASPRS (2014). American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data, USA, 3-9.
  2. Böhhbüy, 2018. Large Scale Map and Map Information roduction Regulation, Official Gazette dated 30.04.2018.
  3. Kapnias, D., Milenov, P. & Kay, S. (2008). Guidelines for Best Practice and Quality Checking of Ortho Imagery, JRC European Commission.
  4. Özbalmumcu, M. (2007). Fundamentals of orthophoto map production by photogrammetric method, advantages and applications of orthophoto, Turkey National Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Society IV. Technical Symposium, İstanbul, Reported Book , 1-11.
  5. Rabiu, L. & Waziri AD. (2014). Digital orthophoto generation with aerial Photographs, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy, Vol 3, No 7.
  6. Şahin İ. (2007). Farklı Kaynaklardan Elde Edilen Sayısal Yükseklik Modellerinin Ortofoto Doğruluğuna Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Y.L. Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Short Communication

Publication Date

April 12, 2019

Submission Date

April 10, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 10, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Yaman, A., Yılmaz, H. M., & Bilgilioğlu, S. S. (2019). Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(1), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.551722
AMA
1.Yaman A, Yılmaz HM, Bilgilioğlu SS. Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications. IJEGEO. 2019;6(1):131-134. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.551722
Chicago
Yaman, Aydan, Hacı Murat Yılmaz, and Süleyman Sefa Bilgilioğlu. 2019. “Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs With Different Specifications”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 6 (1): 131-34. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.551722.
EndNote
Yaman A, Yılmaz HM, Bilgilioğlu SS (April 1, 2019) Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 6 1 131–134.
IEEE
[1]A. Yaman, H. M. Yılmaz, and S. S. Bilgilioğlu, “Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications”, IJEGEO, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–134, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.551722.
ISNAD
Yaman, Aydan - Yılmaz, Hacı Murat - Bilgilioğlu, Süleyman Sefa. “Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs With Different Specifications”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 6/1 (April 1, 2019): 131-134. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.551722.
JAMA
1.Yaman A, Yılmaz HM, Bilgilioğlu SS. Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications. IJEGEO. 2019;6:131–134.
MLA
Yaman, Aydan, et al. “Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs With Different Specifications”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol. 6, no. 1, Apr. 2019, pp. 131-4, doi:10.30897/ijegeo.551722.
Vancouver
1.Aydan Yaman, Hacı Murat Yılmaz, Süleyman Sefa Bilgilioğlu. Comparison of Point Accuracies on Digital Elevation Model Obtained from Digital Air Photographs with Different Specifications. IJEGEO. 2019 Apr. 1;6(1):131-4. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.551722