Improvement of the Environmental Permit and License Application Process in Turkey

Abstract

Improvement on the environmental permit application that has been put into force since 2014 by the By Law on Environmental Permit and License (BLEPL) in Turkey has been achieved through a project realized by the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization to meet the developing and changing technology, and industry needs. The main outputs derived from this project will be briefly outlined and discussed in this study. Initially, the facility inventory lists were created on provincial basis across the country. The related institutions were then contacted, and the provincial and sectoral information of the enterprises that could be within the scope of BLEPL was obtained. On the country basis, 548.323 facilities were evaluated in which 142.477 facilities were classified as permitted, out of scope, in scope and not permitted. According to the data obtained by compiling the facility inventories within the scope of BLEPL constituted only 15% of the existing facilities that were included in the scope of the permit. Annex-1 and Annex-2 of BLEPL were also revised. Moreover, each of the items in the annex lists were evaluated separately and the necessary scope/limit/threshold value/terminology revisions were made. By the amendments made in the annex lists; the number of items decreased to 245 from 272, 24 new items were added and 21 items were removed. Within the study, sectoral guidelines were prepared for each additional item to ensure integrity in permit-license applications throughout the country, and to conduct a scoping study based on accurate, practical and specific standards. Other work packages completed can be addressed as the support, credit and incentive processes carried out by institutions and organizations to increase the efficiency of the documents organized in the implementation of the regulation, studies for searching the documents in question in public tenders, and making suggestions to improve the processes and procedures that the facilities are subject to.

Keywords

• Environmental permit
• Environmental license
• Facility inventory
• Permit/license process

References

1. Bello Bugallo, P.M., Cristóbal Andrade, L., Magán Iglesias, A., Torres López, R. (2013). Integrated environmental permit through Best Available Techniques: evaluation of the fish and seafood canning industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 253-264.
2. Chakrabarti, S., Mitra, N. (2005). Economic and environmental impacts of pollution control regulation on small industries: a case study. Ecological Economics, 54, 53-66.
3. EC (1996). European Commission, Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 257, 26-40.
4. EC (2006). European Commission, Reference Document on Best Available Techniques. IPTS, Seville.
5. EU (2010). Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Official Journal of the European Communities, L 334, 17-119.
6. Farmer A., Armstrong J., Bassi S., Bowyer C., Farmer A., Gantioler S., Geeraerts K., Hjerp P., Lewis M., MPallemaerts M., Watkins E., Withana S. (2010). Sourcebook on EU Environmental Law, Prepared by IEEP for the EPE Banks.
7. Georgopoulou, E., Hontou, V., Gakis, N., Sarafidis, Y., Mirasgedis, S., Lalas, D.P., Loukatos, A., Gargoulas, N., Mentzis, A., Economidis, D., Triantafilopoulos, T., Korizi, K. (2008). BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 359-373.
8. OECD (2007). Guiding Principles of Effective Environmental Permitting Systems.

9. Ribeiro, F. M., Kruglianskas, I. (2013). Improving environmental permitting through performance-based regulation: a case study of Sao Paulo State, Brazil, Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 15-26.
10. Silvo, K., Melanen, M., Honkasalo, A., Ruonala, S., Lindström, M. (2002). Integrated pollution prevention and control e the Finnish approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 35, 45-60.
11. Söderholm, K., Söderholm, P., Helenius, H., Pettersson, M., Viklund, R., Masloboev, V., Mingaleva, T., Petrov, V. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia. Resources Policy, 43, 130–142. Taylor C., Pollard S., Rocks S., Angus A. (2012). Selecting Policy Instruments for Better Environmental Regulation: a Critique and Future Research Agenda. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 268–292.
12. Tian, X., Hu, Y., Yin, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., 2019. Trade impacts of China's Belt and Road Initiative: From resource and environmental perspectives. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 150, 104430.
13. Torres Lopez, E. R., Doval Leira, R., Galera Martínez, M., Bello Bugallo, P. M. (2017). Integrated environmental permit through Best Available Techniques: Evaluation of the dairy industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 512-528.
14. Wang, Z., Li, W., Li, Y., Qin, C., Lv, C., Liu, Y. (2020). The “Three Lines One Permit” Policy: An Integrated Environmental Regulation in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105101.
15. Zhou, J., Wang, J., Jiang, H., Cao, D., Tian, R., Bi, J., Zhang, J., Cheng, X., 2019. A review of development and reform of emission permit system in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 561-569.