Research Article

Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions

Volume: 9 Number: 3 September 8, 2022
EN

Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions

Abstract

The Black Sea is the crossroads for many nations and the economic interests of numerous countries. The ports in the Black Sea are the most important economic activity centres where the Black Sea countries carry out their import and export activities. In this paper, shipping emissions generated from ships visiting the 10 Turkish ports located in the Black Sea were estimated and their ratio in shipping emissions in the Black Sea region was evaluated. Total emissions from ships in the studied ports were estimated as 4.949 t y-1 for NOX, 280.498 t y-1 for CO2, 2.059 t y-1 for SO2, 197 t y-1 for VOC, 260 t y-1 for PM for 2018 based on ship activity-based method. General cargo and tanker ships were responsible for 92% of the total ship-borne emissions in the region, and chemicals, bulk carrier, passenger/ro-ro cargo, and other ships such as tugs, barge, multi-purpose ships, yachts, warships follow it. Emissions produced from ships were mainly emitted at cruising mode (84%), followed by hotelling mode (15%). The environmental cost of the port emissions for each pollutant was estimated as t was estimated as 61,5 million and 6.164 per ship call. Black Sea shipping emissions were 2,5% of the total international shipping emissions and shipping emissions from Turkish ports constitute 6-7% of PM, 14% of CO2, 6-14% of SO2, and 11-20% of NOX emissions of Black Sea emissions. The Black Sea region should be declared as an emission control area/sulphur emission control area to reduce shipping emissions. This is the first study to estimate Turkish port emissions in the Black Sea.

Keywords

References

  1. Alver, F., Sarac, B.A. and Sahin, U.A. (2018). Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010-2015. Atmospheric Pollution Research 9 (2018) 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.02.003
  2. Bayirhan, I., Mersin, K., Tokuşlu, A. and Gazioglu, C. (2019). Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Istanbul Strait. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO),6(3): 238-243. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641397.
  3. Berechman, J. and Tseng, P.H. (2010). Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: The case of Kaohsiung. Transportation Research Part D 17 (2012) 35–38. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.009.
  4. Bickel, P. (2006). Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment. Deliverable 5: Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines. EU-funded project (contract no. FP6-2002-SSP- 1/502481), Germany.
  5. Chiffi, F., Schrooten, E., De Vlieger, I. (2007). EX-TREMIS - Exploring non road Transport Emissions in Europe Final Report. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, DG-JRC, Seville, Spain.
  6. Cofala, J., Amann, M., Heyes, C., Wagner, F., Klimont, Z., Posch, M., Schöpp, W., Tarasson, L., Jonson, J.E., Whall, C., Stavrakaki, A. (2007). Analysis of Policy Measures to Reduce Ship Emissions in the Context of the Revision of the National Emissions Ceilings Directive Service Contract No 070501/2005/419589/MAR/C1, European Commission, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
  7. Deniz, C., Kilic, A. and Cıvkaroglu, G. (2010). Estimation of shipping emissions in Candarli Gulf, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess (2010) 171:219–228, DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-1273-2.
  8. European Communities (EC) (2005). Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update, Office for official publications of the European Communities, web page: http://europa.eu.int, (Accessed 23 October 2020)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 8, 2022

Submission Date

April 10, 2021

Acceptance Date

August 23, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Tokuşlu, A. (2022). Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(3), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.912837
AMA
1.Tokuşlu A. Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions. IJEGEO. 2022;9(3):14-20. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.912837
Chicago
Tokuşlu, Aydın. 2022. “Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9 (3): 14-20. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.912837.
EndNote
Tokuşlu A (September 1, 2022) Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9 3 14–20.
IEEE
[1]A. Tokuşlu, “Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions”, IJEGEO, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 14–20, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.912837.
ISNAD
Tokuşlu, Aydın. “Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9/3 (September 1, 2022): 14-20. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.912837.
JAMA
1.Tokuşlu A. Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions. IJEGEO. 2022;9:14–20.
MLA
Tokuşlu, Aydın. “Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol. 9, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 14-20, doi:10.30897/ijegeo.912837.
Vancouver
1.Aydın Tokuşlu. Analysing Shipping Emissions of Turkish Ports in the Black Sea and Investigating Their Contributions to Black Sea Emissions. IJEGEO. 2022 Sep. 1;9(3):14-20. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.912837

Cited By