A Spectral Band Based Comparison of Unsupervised Segmentation Evaluation Methods for Image Segmentation Parameter Optimization

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 132 - 139, 15.08.2020

Hasan Tonbul Taskin Kavzoglu

https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641216

Cited By: 1

Öz

Very high-resolution images obtained
with recently launched satellite sensors have been used intensively in the
remote sensing area. The widespread use of high-resolution images has greatly
facilitated the creation and updating of land use/land cover (LULC) maps. Traditional
pixel-based image analysis methods that extract information based solely on the
spectral values of pixels are generally not suitable for high-resolution
images. Unlike pixel-based approaches, object-based image analysis (OBIA) uses
pixel clustering (image objects) instead of pixels by considering the shape,
texture, context and spectral features and provide richer information
extraction. Image segmentation is an important process and prerequisite for the
OBIA process. It is essential to evaluate the performance of segmentation
algorithms for the determination of effective segmentation methods and optimization
of segmentation parameters. In this study, the multi-resolution segmentation
algorithm is used for the segmentation process. The effect of spectral bands on
segmentation quality was analysed using a Worldview-2 high-resolution satellite
image. In order to analyze segmentation quality, two unsupervised quality
metrics, namely, F-measure and Plateau
Objective Function (POF) values were calculated for
each band separately. In this manner, optimum parameter values were determined
using different variations of Moran's I Index and variance values. Image
segmentation was performed by using different scale, shape and compactness
parameter values. In this context, 30 segmentation analysis was performed
considering three different spectral bands (red, green and near-infrared
bands).  The results showed that the highest segmentation quality was acquired
for the NIR band among the spectral bands for the F-measure method, while the
highest segmentation quality value was achieved for the green band for the POF metric. In addition, the optimum segmentation parameter values of the
scale, shape and compactness were determined as 30-0.3-0.5 and 50-0.1-0.3 for F-measure and POF
approaches, respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

OBIA, Segmentation, POF, F-measure, Worldview-2, Moran's I

Kaynakça

• Aguilar, M.A., Aguilar, F.J., García Lorca, A., Guirado, E., Betlej, M., Cichon, P., Nemmaoui, A., Vallario, A., Parente, C. (2016). Assessment of multiresolution seg-mentation for extracting greenhouses from WorldView-2 imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (ISPRS archives) 41, 145-152.
• Baatz, M., Schape, A. (2000). Multiresolution segmentation – An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J. et al. (Eds.), Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung (pp. 12–23), Herbert Wichmann Verlag.
• Blaschke, T., Burnett, C., Pekkarinen, A. (2004). New contextual approaches using image segmentation for object-based classification. In: De Meer, F., de Jong, S (Eds.), Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including the spatial domain (pp. 211–236)., Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
• Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Hay, G.J. (2008). Object- Based Image Analysis- Spatial concepts for knowledge driven remote sensing applications. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York.
• Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2-16.
• Clinton, N., Holt, A., Scarborough, J., Yan, L., Gong, P. (2010). Accuracy assessment measure for object-based image segmentation goodness. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 76, 289–299.
• Colkesen, I., Kavzoglu, T. (2017) The use of logistic model tree (LMT) for pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution WorldView-2 imagery. Geocarto International, 32, 71-86.
• Espindola, G.M., Camara, G., Reis, I.A., Bins, L.S., Monteiro, A.M. (2006). Parameter selection for region-growing image segmentation algorithms using spatial autocorrelation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(14), 3035–3040.
• Gao, Y., Mas, J. F., Kerle, N., Navarrete Pacheco, J. A. (2011). Optimal region growing segmentation and its effect on classification accuracy. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(13), 3747-3763.
• Grybas, H., Melendy, L., Congalton, R.G. (2017). A comparison of unsupervised segmentation parameter optimization approaches using moderate-and high-resolution imagery. GIScience Remote Sensing, 54(4), 515-533.
• Hossain, M.D., Chen, D. (2019). Segmentation for object-based image analysis (OBIA): A review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 150, 115-134.
• Jensen, J.R. (2016). Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Johnson, B., Xie, Z. (2011). Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi- scale approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(4), 473-483.
• Johnson, B., Bragais, M., Endo, I., Magcale-Macandog, D., Macandog, P. (2015). Image segmentation parameter optimization considering within- and between-segment heterogeneity at multiple scale levels: test case for mapping residential areas using Landsat imagery. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4, 2292-2305.
• Kavzoglu, T., Colkesen, I. (2013). An assessment of the effectiveness of a Rotation Forest ensemble for land-use and land-cover mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(12), 4224-4241.
• Kavzoglu, T. (2017). Object-Oriented Random Forest for High Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Quickbird-2 Imagery. In: Samui, P., Sekhar, S., Balas, V. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Neural Computation (pp. 607-619), Elsevier.
• Kavzoglu, T., Yildiz Erdemir, M. and Tonbul, H. (2017). Classification of semiurban landscapes from very high-resolution satellite images using a regionalized multiscale segmentation approach. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11(3), 035016.
• Kavzoglu, T., Tonbul H. (2018). An Experimental Comparison of Multi-Resolution Segmentation, SLIC and K-Means Clustering for Object-Based Classification of VHR Imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(18), 6020-6036.
• Martha, T.R., Kerle, N., van Westen, C.J., Jetten, V., Kumar, K.V. (2011). Segment optimization and data-driven thresholding for knowledge-based landslide detection by object-based image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49, 4928-4943.
• Saba, F., Zoej, M.J.V., Mokhtarzade, M. (2016). Optimization of Multiresolution Segmentation for Object-Oriented Road Detection from High-Resolution Images. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42, 75-84.
• Su, T. (2019). Scale-variable region-merging for high resolution remote sensing image segmentation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147, 319-334.
• Tonbul, H., Kavzoglu, T. (2019). Application of Taguchi Optimization and ANOVA Statistics in Optimal Parameter Setting of MultiResolution Segmentation. Proc. Symposium on 9th Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Istanbul, Turkey, 387-391.
• Yang, J., He, Y., Weng, Q. (2015). An automated method to parameterize segmentation scale by enhancing intrasegment homogeneity and intersegment heterogeneity. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Letters, 12 (6), 1282-1286.
• Zhang, Y.J., 1996, A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 29(8), 1335-1346.
• Zhang, H., Fritts, J., Goldman, S. (2008). Image segmentation evaluation: a survey of unsupervised methods. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110(2), 260-280.