Experimental Analyses of EMI Noise Separator for CISPR25

Year 2023, , 150 - 160, 30.06.2023

Samet Yalcin , Tuna Göksu , Selami Kesler , Okan Bingöl

https://doi.org/10.47933/ijeir.1250416

Abstract

In energy transmission systems, devices must be able to work safely with each other. Therefore, electromagnetic emission and susceptibility of the converting systems are expected to be in a certain range. electromagnetic propagation, especially by radiation and conduction, cannot be neglected in power electronics such as electric vehicle, microgrid, aerospace technologies. In order to examine and reduce the noise emitted by the devices, the noise should be separated into common mode and difference mode components. In this study, Shou Wang modeling, which is used to separate the noise components into related components, has been examined in order to analyze the noise components within the framework of the CISPR25 standard used for electric vehicles and redesigned. Circuit simulation and design were done and the results were compared. Thanks to these results, it has been seen that the circuit works efficiently up to 90MHz and gives 8dB S11 reflection parameter at the 108MHz threshold level. In addition, the separator circuit was used in a bidirectional DC-DC converter with a known EMI level of 1KW and the noise components obtained were compared with the components of the converter. As a result, it has been seen that the results obtained using the noise separator circuit are almost the same as the real results. In the 18 - 42 MHz range, only the results obtained with the noise separator are up to 8dBuV higher than the real results, other than that the results are exactly the same.

Keywords

Electromagnetic Interference; Interference Anaylses; Noise Separation;Common Mode, Differential Mode, Electrical Vehicles, CISPR25

Supporting Institution

ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMA PROJELERİ KOORDİNATÖRLÜĞÜ

Project Number

ISUBÜ BTAP 2020-BTAP2-0091

Thanks

This study was supported by Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) with BTAP 2020-BTAP2-0091.

Experimental Analyses of EMI Noise Separator for CISPR25

Abstract

In energy transmission systems, devices must be able to work safely with each other. Therefore, electromagnetic emission and susceptibility of the converting systems are expected to be in a certain range. electromagnetic propagation, especially by radiation and conduction, cannot be neglected in power electronics such as electric vehicle, microgrid, aerospace technologies. In order to examine and reduce the noise emitted by the devices, the noise should be separated into common mode and difference mode components. In this study, Shou Wang modeling, which is used to separate the noise components into related components, has been examined in order to analyze the noise components within the framework of the CISPR25 standard used for electric vehicles and redesigned. Circuit simulation and design were done and the results were compared. Thanks to these results, it has been seen that the circuit works efficiently up to 90MHz and gives 8dB S11 reflection parameter at the 108MHz threshold level. In addition, the separator circuit was used in a bidirectional DC-DC converter with a known EMI level of 1KW and the noise components obtained were compared with the components of the converter. As a result, it has been seen that the results obtained using the noise separator circuit are almost the same as the real results. In the 18 - 42 MHz range, only the results obtained with the noise separator are up to 8dBuV higher than the real results, other than that the results are exactly the same

Keywords

Electromagnetic Interference; Interference Anaylses; Noise Separation;Common Mode, Differential Mode, Electrical Vehicles, CISPR25

Project Number

ISUBÜ BTAP 2020-BTAP2-0091

References

• [1] M. R. Sancar and A. B. Bayram, "Modeling and Economic Analysis of Greenhouse Top Solar Power Plant with Pvsyst Software," International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48 - 59, 2023.
• [2] M. R. Sancar and M. Altınkaynak, "Comparison of Photovoltaic Systems Designed for Different Roof Types for Isparta Province," European Journal of Science and Technology, pp. 1024-1028, 2021.
• [3] MARIAN K. KAZIMIERCZUK, “Pulse-Width Modulated DC–DC Power Converters”, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016.
• [4] A. Genc, H. Dogan, I. B. Basyigit and S. Helhel, "Heatsink Preselection Chart to Minimize Radiated Emission in Broadband on the PCB," in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 419-426, April 2021, doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2020.3019958 160
• [5] H. Dogan, I. B. Basyigit, A. Genc and S. Helhel, "Parametric Study of the Radiated Emission From the Plate-Fin CPU Heatsink at 2–8 GHz," in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2401-2410, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2020.2980773
• [6] I. B. Basyigit, A. Genc, H. Dogan, S. Helhel, “The effect of fin types of the heatsinks on radiated emission on the printed circuit board at S-C band”, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Volume 62, Issue 10 p. 3099-3106, 2020.
• [7] H. Dogan, I. B. Basyigit and A. Genc, "Variation of Radiated Emission from Heatsinks on PCB according to Fin Types," 2019 3rd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), Ankara, Turkey, 2019, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ISMSIT.2019.8932797.
• [8] I. B. Basyigit, A. Genc, H. Dogan, F. A. Şenel, S. Helhel, “Deep learning for both broadband prediction of the radiated emission from heatsinks and heatsink optimization”, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Volume 24, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 706-714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.01.006.
• [9] A. B. Karaman, A. Kocakusak, A. Genç and S. Helhel, "The Effect of Feeding Point on Electromagnetic Emission Due to Heat Sink," 2019 PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS-Spring), Rome, Italy, 2019, pp. 368-371, doi: 10.1109/PIERS-Spring46901.2019.9017476.
• [10] A. Genç, S. Helhel, “The Comparison of EM Characteristics of the Heatsinks with Equal Base Area Depending on the Various Geometries”, 10th International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems, Sakarya, Turkiye, 2019.
• [11] S. Maniktala, Switching Power Supplies A - Z, Oxford: Elsevier, 2012.
• [12] S. Yalçın, T. Göksu, S. Kesler and O. Bingöl, "Determination of conducted emi in sic based dual active bridge converter," International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, pp. 241-244, 2020.
• [13] L. Tihanyi, EMC in Power Electronics, Florida: IEEE Press, 2004.
• [14] R. Ozenbaugh, Emi Filter Design Second Edition, New York: Markel Dekker, Inc., 2001.
• [15] M. Montrose and E. Nakauchi, Testing For EMC Compliance Approaches and Techniques, Canada: A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION, 2004.
• [16] S. Yalçin, Ş. Özen and S. Helhel, "EMI flter design based on the separated electromagnetic interference in switched mode power supplies," Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, p. 3033 – 3043, 2018.
• [17] P. S. Niklaus, M. M. Antivachis, D. Bortis and J. W. Kolar, "Analysis of the Influence of Measurement Circuit Asymmetries on Three-Phase CM/DM Conducted EMI Separation," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, pp. 4066 - 4080, 2021.
• [18] D. Bockelman ve W. Eisenstadt, «Combined Differential and Common-Mode Scattering Parameters: Theory and Simulation,» Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transactions on, Cilt %1 / %20018-9480 , no. 5035123, pp. 1530 - 1539, 1995.
• [19] K. S. Kostov, S. Schroth, F. Krismer, M. Priecinsky, H. -P. Nee and J. W. Kolar, "The Input Impedance of Common-Mode and Differential-Mode Noise Separators," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, pp. 2352 - 2360, 2015.
• [20] C. Paul and K. Hardin, "Diagnosis and reduction of conducted noise emissions," Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1988. Symposium Record., IEEE 1988 International Symposium, 1988.
• [21] T. Guo, D. Chen and F. Lee, "Separation of the common-mode- and differential-mode-conducted EMI noise," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions, vol. 11 , no. 3, pp. 480 - 488, 1996.
• [22] A. Nagel and R. W. D. Doncker, "Separating Common Mode and Differential Mode Noise in EMI Measurement," European Power Electronics and Drives Journal, pp. 27-30, 2000 .
• [23] M. Caponet, F. Profumo, L. Ferraris, A. Bertoz ve D. Marzella, «Common and differential mode noise separation: comparison of two different approaches,» Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2001. PESC. 2001 IEEE 32nd Annual, cilt 3 , pp. 1383 - 1388, 2001.
• [24] M. Caponet ve F. Profumo, «Devices for the separation of the common and differential mode noise design and realization,» Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2002. APEC 2002. Seventeenth Annual IEEE, cilt 1, no. 8, pp. 100 - 105, 2002.
• [25] S. Wang, F. Lee and W. Odendaal, "Characterization, evaluation, and design of noise Separator for conducted EMI noise diagnosis," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions, vol. 20 , no. 4, pp. 974 - 982, 2005.
• [26] K. Kostov, Design and Characterization of Single-Phase Power Filters, HELSINKI, 2009.
• [27] A. Mehadi, M. Chowdhury, M. N. M., F. Faisal and M. M. Islam, "A software-based approach in designing a rooftop bifacial PV system for the North Hall of Residence," Clean Energy, p. 403–422, 2021.
• [28] M. R. SANCAR and A. K. YAKUT, "Comparative Analysis of SAM and PVsyst Simulations for a Rooftop Photovoltaic System," International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, pp. 60-76, 2022.