Physico-Chemical Properties and In Vitro Fermentation Evaluation of Ensiled Guinea Grass (Panicum Maximum) With Different Protein Additives

Abstract

Preservation of guinea grass with protein additives as silage for dry-season feeding makes it possible to preserve and improve its nutritional composition. Consequently, research was carried out to investigate the nutritive values of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) ensiled with different protein additives. Guinea grass was ensiled with Tephrosia bracteolata, cassava tops, soybean meal, poultry litter, and urea to obtain the following silages: Guinea grass only (Gg) control, Gg + Tephrosia bracteolata (Gg + Tb), Gg + cassava tops (Gg + Sbm), Gg + poultry litter (Gg + Pl), Gg + urea (Gg + U), and Gg + soybean meal (Gg + Sm) respectively) and designated as follows: T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6. The guinea grass was ensiled with 10% protein additives except urea, which was added at a 3% level, and each treatment was replicated four times. After nine months (9 months) of fermentation, the silages were opened, and physical characteristics, chemical composition, and in vitro fermentation evaluation were determined using standard techniques. The silages were characterised by a greenish-yellow colour, a firm and dry texture, a pleasant and fruity odour, and not being mouldy. All these characteristics indicate that the silage was preserved well. The temperature (0 C), pH (3.41–5.69), percentage moisture content (62.39–71.79%), and dry matter (28.01–37.86%) of the silages were significantly (P 0.05) different across the treatments. Furthermore, the results of the chemical analysis showed that all the nutrients in the silages were significantly (P 0.05) different except the EE, which was similar across the treatments. The crude protein (CP) contents (10.91–21.78%) and crude fibre (CF) levels (24.47–27.00%) of silages varied significantly (P 0.05) across the treatments. Fibre fractions (neutral detergent fibre (NDF) 58.03–61.47% and acid detergent lignin (ADL) 13.23–15.53%) were significantly (P 0.05) different, while acid detergent fibre (ADF), cellulose, and hemicellulose were similar across the treatments. There were significant (P 0.05) differences in in vitro fermentation means of methane (5.00–6.00%), total gas volume (9.00–15.00 ml), metabolisable energy (4.20–4.92 KJ/DM), short chain fatty acid (0.16–0.31 ml), dry matter degradability (32.35–42.36%), organic matter digestibility (35.35–42.36%), and fermentation efficiency (2.78–4.24). The results obtained from this study indicate that all the protein additives used in ensiled guinea grass improved the protein contents significantly, and in vitro fermentation gas production indicates a low level of methane (CH4) production, an indication of a reduction in energy loss.

Keywords

• Degradability
• Fermentation
• silage
• crude protein
• Methane

References

1. A.O.A.C. 2005. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The official methods of Analysis 18th Edition. AOAC mc, Arlington. Virginia 1094pp.
2. Adesogan, A.T and Newman Y.C 2010 Silage Harvesting Stung, and Feeding SS-AGR-177/AG180- Forage Management (Florida Forage Handbook), PP1-7
3. Agishi, E. C. 1985. Forage legumes and pasture development in Nigeria. In saka Murn and Ryan J. G, (Eds) ACIAR proceeding series of No. 4 ACIAR Canberra pp 79-87.
4. Ajayi F.T. 2011. Effects of feeding ensiled mixture of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) with three grain legume plants on digestibility and nitrogen balance of West African dwarf goats. Livestock Science.142 (1) 80 – 84.
5. Alasa, M. C and Babayemi, O.J. 2010. Chemical composition and in vitro gas production of Panicum maximum intercropped with two cultivars of Lablab purpureus. Fast-tracking animal agriculture in a challenged economy. 35th Annual conference held at University of Ibadan. 14th- 17th March, 2010 pp. 587-560.
6. Amuda, A. J Alabi, B.O. and Jonah, S.A. 2020. Nutritional quality of ensiled gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) fortified with graded levels of Centro (Centrosema pascourum). Nigeria Journal of Animal Production, 47(1): 234 – 245.
7. Arroquy, J.I., Cornacchione, M.V., Colombatto, D., Kunst, C. 2014. Chemical composition and in vitro ruminal degradation of hay and silage from tropical grasses. Canadian Journal of Dairy Science.94, 705 – 715.
8. Babayemi, O .J. and Bamikole, M. A. 2006. Effect of Tephrosia candida DC leaf and its mixtures with guinea grass on the in vitro fermentation changes in feed for ruminants in Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 5: (1): 14 – 18.

9. Babayemi, O. J. Ifut, O. J. Inyang, U. A. Isaac, and Isaac, I. J. 2010. Quality and chemical composition of cassava waste ensiled with Albizia saman pods. Journal of Agricultural Production. Volume 6: (3) pp. 225– 228.
10. Babayemi, O. J., Ekokotu, O. A and Iyang, A. U. 2009. Evaluation of ensiled cassava peels togeher with Albiza saman pods. Umoh,B.I, Udedibe,A.B.I, Solomon,I.R., Obasi,O.L., Okon, B.I. and Udoh.E.J., (Eds). Proceedings of the 34th Nigerian Society for Animal Conference, pp. 547-550
11. Babayemi, O.J. 2009. Silage quality, dry matter intake and digestibility by West African dwarf sheep of Panicum maximum (Panicum maximum cv Ntchisi) harvested at 4 and 12 week regrowth’s. African Journal of Biotechnology. Vol.8 (16) pp3983- 3988.
12. Babayemi, O.J., Demeyer, D. and Fievez, V. 2004. In vitro fermentation of tropical browse seeds in relation to their content of secondary metabolites. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology. 13(1): 31 – 34.
13. Beuvink, J. M. W. and Spoelstra, S .F. 1992. Interaction between treatment, fermentation end-products buffering systems and gas production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates by mixed rumen micro-organisms in vitro. Appl. Microbial Biotechnology. 37: 505 – 509.
14. Blummel, M. and Becker, K. 1997. The degradability characteristics of 54 roughage and roughage neutral detergent fibre as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. British Journal of Nutrition, 77: 757 – 760.
15. Blummel, M. and Ørskov, E.R. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughage in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40: 109 – 119.
16. Bolsen, K. K, Ashbell G and Weinberg, Z. G. 1996. Silage fermentation and silage additives. Review, Asian – Australian Journal of Animal Science, 9 (5):483 – 493.
17. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics.11:1-2
18. Falola, O. O. and Olufayo, O. O. 2017. In vitro gas production assessment of Panicum maximum incubated with Leucaena leucocephala at varying proportions to predict the nutritional value for ruminants. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production, 47(1): 371 – 377.
19. FAO. 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization. Silage making for small scale Farmers.
20. Fasina, O.E. 2012. Silage quality of forages from four cassava clones. Bitto, I.I., Kaankuk, F.G. and Attah, S. (Eds). Proceeding, 37th Annual Conference of Nigeria Society for Animal Production. 18 – 21.
21. Fellner, V. 2004. In vitro versus in vivo estimates of ruminal fermentation. Department of Animal Science. North Carolina State University.
22. Fievez, V., Babayemi, O. J. and Demeyer, D. 2005. Estimation of direct and indirect gas production in syringes: a tool to estimate short chain fatty acid production requiring minimal laboratory facilities. Animal Feed Science Technology. 128 – 124, 197 – 210.
23. Getachew, G., Marker, H. P. S. and Becker, K. 1999. Stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production in presence and absence of polyethylene glycol for tannin containing browses, EAAP Satellite Symposium, Gas production, fermentation kinetics for feed evaluation and to assess microbial activity, 18 – 19 August, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
24. Gillespie, J. R. 1998. Animal Science. Delmar Publishers, International, Thompson Publishing Company. pp. 1204.
25. Harrison, J. H. Blauwiekel, M.R. and Stokes, M.R. 1995. Fermentation and utilisation of grass silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 77: 3209 –3235.
26. Holter, J. B. and Young, A. J. 1992. Methane production in dry and lactating Holstein Cows. Journal of. Dairy Science. 75: 2165 – 2175
27. Kellems, R. O. and Church, D. C. 1998. Livestock Feeds and Feeding (4th edition). Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA. 537p.
28. Kung, L. and Shaver, .R. 2002. Interpretation and Use of Silage. Analysis Report. Focus on Forage.3:1-5.
29. Li, D., Ni, K.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, Y., Yang, F. 2019. Fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community of tropical forage silage under different temperatures. Asian-Australas. Journal of Animal Science. 32, 665 – 674.
30. Mannetje. L‟t. 1999. Introduction to the conference on silage making in the tropics in L‟tMannetje (Ed).Silage making in the tropics with particular Emphasis on Smallholders. FAO. Plant Production and Protection. Paper 161.
31. Mauricio, R.M., Mould, F. L., Abdalla, A.L. and Owen, E. 1999. The potential nutritive value for ruminants of some tropical feedstuffs as indicated by in vitro gas production and chemical analysis. Animal Feed evaluation Science Technology 79: 321-330
32. McDonald P., Edwards, R.A and Greenhalgh, J.F.D and Morgan, C.A 1995.Animal Nutrition (5th edition). Longman Group Limited. London, Pp. 607.
33. Menesses, M.D., Megias, J. Madrid, A., Martinez, Teruel, F. Hernandez, J. Oliva. 2007. Evaluation of the phytosanitary, Fermentative and nutritive characteristics of the silage made from crude artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) by-product feeding for ruminants. Small Ruminant Research 70:292 – 296.
34. Moran, J. (2005). Tropical Dairy Farming: Feeding management for smallholder dairy farmers in
35. Muck, R. E. 1996. Silage inoculation: In inoculation of Silage and its effects on silage quality, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Centre, Int. Conference with Dairy and Forage industries. Pp. 43 – 51.
36. Nagadi, S., Herrero, M., and Jessop, N. S. 2000. The influence of diet of the donor animal on the initial bacterial concentration of ruminal fluid and in vitro gas production degradability parameters. Animal Feed Science Technology. 87: 231– 239.
37. Njidda, A. A., Ikhimioya, I. and Babayemi, O.J. 2010. Variation of 24hr In vitro gas production and estimated metabolisable energy values of ruminants feeds. Babayemi, O. J., Abu, O.A. and Ewuola, E.O. (Eds): Proceedings of the 35th Nigerian society for animal production 14th – 17th March 2010, pp. 597 – 600.
38. Nousiainen, J. Ahvenjarvi, S. Rinne, M., Hellamak, M. and Huhtanen, P. 2004. Prediction of indigestible cell wall fraction of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science Technology. 115: 295 – 311.
39. NRC. 2001. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep.7th Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
40. Odedire, J. A. and Babayemi, O. J. 2008. Comparative studies on the yield and chemical composition of Panicum maximum and Andropogon gayanus as influenced by Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume20,Article27. Retrieved July 22, 2009, from http://www.Irrd20/2/oded20027.htm.
41. Olorunnisomo, O.A. 2008. Sweet potato as a ruminant feed: Performance of sheep fed mixtures of the forage and root. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 35(2): 242 – 251.
42. Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, L. 1979. The estimation of Protein degradation ability in the rumen from incubation measurement weighed according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge. 92:499 – 503
43. Ørskov, E. R. and Ryle, M. 1990. Energy Nutrition in Ruminants. Elsevier, London. Pp. 149.
44. Oyatayo T. K., Songu A. G., Amos A. G. and Ndabula C 2015. Assessment of heavy metal concentration in hand dug well water from selected land uses in Wukari Town, Wukari, Taraba state Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environmental protection (3) 1-10.
45. Parlizdar, M.H., Sadeghipanah, H., Amanlou, H., Nazer Adl and Mirhadi 2011. In vitro organic matter digestibility and gas production of fresh-meal coated with fat. African Journal of biotechnology Vol. 10 (13), pp. 25448 – 2555. ISSN 2684 – 5315@2011. Academic Journal.
46. Poppi, D.P., Quigley, S.P., Silva, T. A.C.C.D., McLennan, S.R. 2018. Challenges of beef cattle production from tropical pastures. Rev. Bras.De Zootec. 47, 419.
47. Retrieved on January 18, 2012 from www.ueexedu/other Areas/Publication/PDF/FSA-3052pdf.
48. Rinne, M. Jaakkola, S., and Huhtanem, P. 1997. Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets.1 Organic matter digestion, rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilisation. Animal Feed Science Technology. 67: 1– 17.
49. Santos, E. M.; Pereira, O.G.; Garcia, R.; Ferreira, C. L. ; Oliveira, J. S.; Silva, T.C.2014. Effect of regrowth interval and a microbial inoculant on fermentation profile and dry matter recovery of guinea grass silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 97, 4423 - 4432
50. Singh, G. P. and Oosting, S.J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets.I. Ruminating fermentation, Journal of Animal Science. 70:35551 – 3561.
51. Somart, K. Parker,D.S.Poulison, P. and Wanapat, M, 2000. Fermentation characteristic and microbial protein synthesis in an in vitro system using cassava, rice straw and dried ruzi grass as substrates. Asia – Aust. Journal of Animal Science. 13:1084 –1094. the humid tropics. Land link press. Pp. 321.
52. Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of Ruminats. 2nd Edition. Cornell Universiity Press, USA. Pp. 476.
53. White, D.S Peters, M. Horne, P. 2013. Global Impacts from improved tropical forages: A meta-analysis revealing overlooked benefits and costs, evolving values and new priorities. In Proceedings of the 22nd Grasslands Congress: Revitalising Grasslands to Sustain Our Communities, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 15 -16 September 2013.