Evaluation of Socio-Economic Characteristics of Fuel Wood Marketers in Kurmi Local Government Area of Taraba State, Nigeria.

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the socio-economic characteristics of firewood marketers in the study area. Data were collected through the use of a structured questionnaire. Three big firewood markets in the area were purposefully selected for the study. A total of 30 respondents, representing 50% of the marketers, were administered the questionnaire. The collected data were analysed by descriptive statistics using tables, frequencies, and percentages. The results revealed that the majority (57%) of the respondents were in the age bracket of 31–40, and 90% were males. (70%) were married, and (50%) of the respondents had a family size of 1 to 5 people. The majority (73%) of the respondents had no formal education; (76%) of them were farming as their primary occupation; they had only ten years of experience in the firewood business; and they were operating individually without forming an association. The respondents major constraints were low patronage (44.0%, followed by low cost (27.1%), lack of transport (16.6%) and lack of accessibility with (13.3%).Socio-economic factors that influenced firewood marketing in the area are age, gender, marital status, and family size. It is recommended that the government engage the marketers in the plans for sustainable utilisation and management of forest resources in the area

Keywords

• fuel
• wood Markers
• Krumi Local Government
• Energy

References

1. Adebayo E. F, Onu J. I 1999. Economics of rice production in Yola north and south local government areas. Nigerian Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 1: 15-20
2. Afolabi, J. A. 2007. Evaluation of poultry egg marketing in south western Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Service, 6(5): 362-366.
3. Amaza, P. S. 2000. Resources-use Efficiency in Food Crop Production in Gombe State, Nigeria. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ibadan: University of Ibadan.
4. Ani, A. O. 2004. Women in Agriculture and Rural Development. 1st edition, Maiduguri Nigeria: Priscaquila Publishers.
5. Belcher B, Schreckenberg, K. 2007. Commercialization of non-timber forest products a reality check. Dev. Policy Rev 25(3): 355-377
6. Coulibaly-Lingani P, Tigabu M, Savadogo P, Oden P. C., & Qoadba, .M. 2009. Determinants of access to forest products in sothern Bukina Faso. Forest Policy Econ. 11(7) 516-524
7. Edmund, M, 2005. Environmental Economic Benefits, Communities Rural Livelihood and Policy-Nigeria, AFTA proceedings,from (research from23July2010).
8. Fidellia, D. N, 2005. Tread in gender enrollment disparity in vocational technical education in Nigeria.Internationl Journal of FAWENS, Nigeria 1(3): 16.

9. Kabubo-Mariara, J., & Gachok, C. 2008. Forest Dependence and Household Welfare Empirical Evidence from Kenya CHPA Discussion paper No 41.
10. Mandie, M. 2005. A tool for accelerated Socio-economic Improvement of Rural Livelihood in Nigeria Agroforestry.In: aabduljabar. MSc, Thesis Unpublished. Department of Agricultural Economic and Extension.Federal University of Technology Yola Adadmawa State Nigeria.
11. Mujawamariya G., & Karimov, A. A. 2014. Importance of Socio-economic factors in the collection of NTFPs. The case gum Arabic in Kenya. Frest Pol. Econ. 42:2-24
12. Nash R, & Cecilia, I. 2006. Forest Policy and Environment Programme, Grey Literature. The Firewood Debate, Maiduguri ,Nigeria: Mainasara Publishers.
13. Umotong, I. D. 2004. Death: A phenominon to be appreciated. Sophia: An African Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 77-82.
14. WWEA, 2009.World Wind Energy Association.Uniting the world of wind Energy.WWEA report. Charles-de-Gaulle-Street.5: 53113 Bonn Germany.