DECISION SUPPORT FOR OPERATING ROOM TURNOVER TIME REDUCTION: AN AHP AND FAHP FRAMEWORK

Year 2026, Volume: 11 Issue: 1 , 14 - 27 , 28.02.2026

Seyda Gur

https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1794573

https://izlik.org/JA88NW64CK

Abstract

Operating rooms are among the most critical, resource-intensive, and costly units in healthcare institutions, where efficiency and safety directly affect both clinical outcomes and organizational sustainability. Among the performance indicators of these environments, turnover time (TOT)—defined as the interval between the completion of one surgical procedure and the initiation of the next—has emerged as a strategic benchmark. Prolonged TOT not only restricts surgical capacity and reduces patient throughput but also increases operational costs and poses risks for patient safety. Consequently, optimizing TOT is an imperative issue in healthcare management. This study sought to evaluate the key factors influencing operating room turnover time using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. Specifically, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) methods were employed to capture both deterministic evaluations and the uncertainties inherent in healthcare processes. Comparative analyses between the two approaches highlighted both convergences and divergences in factor prioritization. Results demonstrated that human-related aspects—particularly staff fatigue and performance monitoring capacity—were consistently identified as the most influential determinants in both methods. In contrast, tangible process-related elements such as cleaning efficiency and patient transfer ranked higher in the AHP, whereas training initiatives and technology-based applications gained importance under the uncertain conditions modeled by the FAHP. The findings emphasize the need to adopt a holistic strategy that integrates human resource management, streamlined process design, and advanced technological solutions. By aligning operational practices with evidence-based prioritization, healthcare institutions can reduce inefficiencies, improve patient safety, and enhance cost-effectiveness in surgical care delivery.

Keywords

Operating Room , Turnover Time , AHP , FAHP , Efficiency

Ethical Statement

The study does not require ethics approval, consent to participate and consent to publication.

References

• Gür, Ş, Alakaş, HM, Pınarbaşı, M, Eren, T. “Stochastic operating room scheduling: a new model for solving problem and an approach for determining the factors that affect operation time variations”, Soft Computing, 28(5): 3987-4007, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09369-1
• Marjamaa, RA, Kirvelä, OA. “Who is responsible for operating room management and how do we measure how well we do it?”, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 51(7): 809-814, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01368.x
• Cardoen, B, Demeulemeester, E, & Beliën, J. “Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3): 921-932, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.011
• Macario, A. “What does one minute of operating room time cost?”, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 22(4): 233-236, 2010. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.02.003
• Testi, A, Tànfani, E. “Tactical and operational decisions for operating room planning: Efficiency and welfare implications”, Health Care Management Science, 12(4): 363-373, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-008-9093-4
• WHO. Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. World Health Organization, 2016.
• OECD. Health at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020.
• Levine, WC, Dunn, PF. “Optimizing operating room scheduling”, Anesthesiology Clinics, 33(4): 697-711, 2015.
• Fügener, A, Hans, EW, Kolisch, R., Kortbeek, N, Vanberkel, PT. “Master surgery scheduling with consideration of multiple downstream units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1): 227-236, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.009
• Childers, CP, Maggard-Gibbons, M. “Understanding costs of care in the operating room”, JAMA Surgery, 153(4): e176233-e176233, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233
• Cendán, JC, Good, M. “Interdisciplinary work flow assessment and redesign decreases operating room turnover time and allows for additional caseload”, Archives of Surgery, 141(1): 65-69, 2006. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.1.65
• Kodali, BS., Kim, D, Bleday, R, Flanagan, H, Urman, RD. “Successful strategies for the reduction of operating room turnover times in a tertiary care academic medical center”, Journal Of Surgical Research, 187(2): 403-411, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1081
• Cohen, TN, Anger, JT, Shamash, K, Cohen, KA, Nasseri, Y, Francis, S., ... Shouhed, D. “Discovering the barriers to efficient robotic operating room turnover time: perceptions vs. reality”, Journal of Robotic Surgery, 14(5): 717-724, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01045-y
• Cohen, TN, Anger, JT, Shamash, K, Catchpole, KR, Avenido, R, Ley, EJ, ... Shouhed, D. “The application of human factors engineering to reduce operating room turnover in robotic surgery”, World Journal of Surgery, 46(6): 1300-1307, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06487-z
• Perez, ER., Kerko, R, Lever, N, White, A, Kahf, S, Avella-Molano, B. “Operating room relay strategy for turnover time improvement: a quality improvement project”, BMJ Open Quality, 11(3), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001957
• Goldhaber, NH, Schaefer, RL, Martinez, R, Graham, A, Malachowski, E, Rhodes, LP, ... McHale, M. “Surgical pit crew: initiative to optimise measurement and accountability for operating room turnover time”, BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 30(1): e100741, 2023. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100741.
• Passarelli, PR. Evaluating Interventions to Improve Operating Room Turnover Time. Ph. D. thesis, Texas A&M University, University Health Services, 2024.
• MacMillan, L, Madura, GM, Elliot, M, Frendl, DM, Jorge, IA, Fong, ZV, ... Etzioni, DA. “What affects operating room turnover time? A systematic review and mapping of the evidence”, Surgery, 181: 109263, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109263
• Sarmad, A, Ahmadinejad, B, Jalali, A, Bahramian, F. “Implementation of Operating Room Management Systems: An MCDM Approach”, Journal of Health Management, 27(4), 631-641, 2005.
• Saaty, TL, Wind, Y. “Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process”, Management science, 26(7): 641-658, 1980.
• Chaube, S, Pant, S, Kumar, A, Uniyal, S, Singh, MK, Kotecha, K, Kumar, A. “An overview of multi-criteria decision analysis and the applications of AHP and TOPSIS methods”, International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 9(3): 581, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.3.030
• Ho, W, Dey, PK. Lockström, M. “Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6): 446-461, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171093
• Liberatore, MJ, Nydick, RL. “The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1): 194-207, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
• Aksüt, G, Eren, T, Alakaş, HM. “Using wearable technological devices to improve workplace health and safety: An assessment on a sector base with multi-criteria decision-making methods”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(2): 102423, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102423
• Bulut, U, Uzun, B, Güven, E, Eren, T. “Rinoplasti ameliyatı öncesinde görüntü eldesinin çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmesi”, Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 9(1): 200-214, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1612502
• KarimiAzari, A, Mousavi, N, Mousavi, SF, Hosseini, S. “Risk assessment model selection in construction industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8): 9105-9111, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110
• Davras, GM, Karaatlı, M. “Otel işletmelerinde tedarikçi seçimi sürecinde AHP ve BAHP yöntemlerinin uygulanması”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1): 87-112, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.64906
• Chang, DY. “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3): 649-655, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
• Kahraman, C, Cebeci, U, Ulukan, Z. “Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP”, Logistics Information Management, 16(6): 382-394, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576050310503367
• Büyüközkan, G, Çifçi, G. “A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3): 2341-2354, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061
• Gür, Ş, Eren, T. “Prioritization of operating room maintenance factors with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”, Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 100549, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100549
• Zeng, J, An, M, Smith, NJ. “Application of a fuzzy based decision-making methodology to construction project risk assessment”, International Journal of Project Management, 25(6): 589-600, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006
• Ertuğrul, İ, Karakaşoğlu, N. “Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7): 783-795, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
• Yazıcı, E, Alakaş, HM, Eren, T. “Selection of waste receiving companies for sustainable industrial symbiosis network: an application a case in Ankara for foundry industry waste”, Neural Computing and Applications, 36(21): 13009-13026, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09683-1
• Tezcan, B, Eren, T. “Integer programming based on spherical fuzzy AHP and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS for wildfire equipment planning”, Environment Systems and Decisions, 45(3): 38, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-025-10029-y
• Williams, MA, McVeigh, J, Handa, AI, Lee, R. “Augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review”, Postgraduate Medical Journal, 96(1139): 537-542, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137600