DETERMINATION OF OCCUPATIONAL COMPUTER USAGE LEVELS OF NURSES IN MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS: A REAL HOSPITAL CASE STUDY

Year 2019, , 162 - 172, 13.12.2019

Alaattin Parlakkılıç

https://doi.org/10.23884/ijhsrp.2019.4.3.02

Abstract

With the development of technology, the role and responsibility of
nurses in various health institutions have diversified. The main purpose of
this change is to provide better quality health services to individuals. This
research aims to investigate Information Technology Readiness of Public Health
Nurses in Turkey. A survey was done with a
total of 104 nurses. To measure IT readiness, technological skills readiness,
attitude readiness, task-ready information technology readiness and
institutional support readiness were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale.
The scores of the participants were evaluated as technological skills readiness
was 3.83 (76,6 %); attitude readiness was 3.67 (73,4 %), task-ready information
technology readiness was 3.85 (77%) and institutional support readiness was
3.65 (73 %). The results of the dimensions show that nurses are extremely prone
to use technology in their work. The overall results show that the information
technology readiness for nurses has been found at 3.75 (75 %) and  needs a few improvements.

Keywords

Information technology, readiness, technological skills

References

• 1. Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, Buikstra E, Hegney D. The Status of Training and Education in Information and Computer Technology of Australian Nurses: A National Survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing (ERA Rank A). 2008; 17(20), 2758-2767.
• 2. Sinsky, C. A., Willard-Grace, R., Schutzbank, A. M., Sinsky, T. A., Margolius, D., & Bodenheimer, T. In search of joy in practice: A report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Annals of Family Medicine. 2013; 11(3), 272-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1531
• 3. Kaya, N., & Aştı, T. Sağlık Bakımında Bilgisayar Kullanımına Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin Güvenirlik ve Geçerliği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi.2008; 16(61), 24-32.
• 4. Jaeger, F. N., Bechir, M., Harouna, M., Moto, D. D., & Utzinger, J. Challenges and opportunities for healthcare workers in a rural district of Chad. BMC health services research. 2018; . 18(1), 7. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2799-6C.
• 5. Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., … Haines, A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS medicine. 2013; 10(1), e1001362. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362
• 6. Bowles, K. H., Dykes, P., & Demiris, G. The use of health information technology to improve care and outcomes for older adults. Research in gerontological nursing. 2015; 8(1), 5–10. doi:10.3928/19404921-20121222-01
• 7. Matthew-Maich, N., Harris, L., Ploeg, J., Markle-Reid, M., Valaitis, R., Ibrahim, S., … Isaacs, S. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2016;. 4(2), e29. doi:10.2196/mhealth.5127
• 8. Janice, P.LOn the move with mHealth: Nurses develop mobile health tools. 2018; Retrieved from https://www.nurse.com/blog/2015/11/09/on-the-move-with-mhealth-nurses-develop-mobile-health-tools/
• 9. Austin. R., & Hull, S. The Power of Mobile Health Technologies and Prescribing Apps”, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2014; 32(11). 513-515 10. Cobb, C., Sudar, S., Reiter, N., Anderson, R., Roesner, F., Kohno, T. ComputerConference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 2016
• 11. Farmer, R. The Rise of Mobile Health Apps, Minority and Community Health, Nurse Health. 2015
• 12. S. F. Ellen, P. H. Pixita, and E. M. Susan, “Collaborating to Cross the Mathematics–Literacy Divide:An Annotated Bibliography of Literacy Strategies for Mathematics Classrooms”, Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy. 2011; 55 (1): 57–66,
• 13. Holt, D. T, Vardaman, J. M. Toward a comprehensive understanding of readiness for change: The case for an expanded conceptualization. Journal of Change Management. 2013; 13(1), 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2013.768426 ICTD ’16. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2:1–2:11.
• 14. Kaya, N. Factors Affecting Nurses' Attitudes Toward Computers in Healthcare. Computers Informatics Nursing. 2011; 29(2), 121-129.
• 15. Nyoni, J. E-readiness of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Facilitators: Implications for Effective Mediation. Perspectives in Education. 2014; 32(3), 78-91
• 16. Saekow, A. & Samson, D. E-learning Readiness of Thailand’s Universities Comparing to the USA’s Cases, International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. 2011; 1(2) : 126-131. 17. Aydın, C. H., & Taşçı. D. Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society. 2005; 8(4), 244-257.
• 18. Caison, A.L., Bulman D., Pai S. & Neville, D. ‘Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian University’, Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2008; 22(3): 283–294 19. Joo,Y. J., Joung S & Sim W. J. Structural relationships among internal locus of control, institutional support, flow, and learner persistence in cyber universities. Computers in Human Behavior. 2011; 27(2), 714-722.
• 20. Şahin, G., & Başak, T. Mobile Learning in Nursing "M-Learning". Journal of Human Sciences. 2017; 14(3).
• 21. Çakır, Ö., & Horzum, M. B. Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevrimiçi Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeylerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama. 2015; 11(1), 1-15
• 22. Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. Validation of the Diagnostic Tool for AssessingTertiary Students’ Readiness for Online Learning. Higher Education Research & Development. 2007; 26(2), 217-234.
• 23. Fogerson, D. L.. Readiness Factors Contributing to Participant Satisfaction in Online Higher Education Courses. Doctoral Dissertations. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.2005