Planting time and spacing effects on marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) NK1 orange: a comprehensive study in Nangarhar, Afghanistan

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 94 - 105, 15.08.2025

Tayebullah Zahid , Zabihullah Safi , Mohammad Ismail Sadat , Sajidullah Safi , Asmatullah Durani , Shafiqullah Aryan

https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1664128

Öz

Marigolds are widely valued for their ornamental beauty and versatility in landscaping, yet optimal horticultural practices for their cultivation under specific local agro-climatic conditions still need to be determined. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cultivation time and spacing on growth, flower yield, and flowering duration of Marigolds. A field experiment was conducted on the marigold NK1 orange variety based on a factorial randomized block design. The planting times were February 4th (P1), February 21st (P2), and March 8th (P3), while the spacings were 30 cm × 30 cm (S1), 30 cm × 45 cm (S2), 45 cm × 45 cm (S3), and 45 cm × 60 cm (S4). The P2 treatment significantly (p<0.05) increased plant height, with no differences among the spacing treatments. The number of primary branches per plant and stem girth varied significantly with planting time and spacing. Stem girth positively correlated (r = 0.41) with plant spread under different timings. The P2-S2 treatment influenced the most significant flower size, and the maximum length of the ray floret was also observed in the P2 treatment. Flower size had a positive correlation (r = 0.48) with the length of the ray floret. Additionally, the highest significant (p<0.05) flower fresh weight and flower yield per plant were observed in the P2 treatment. Furthermore, the P2 and P3 treatments had a longer flowering duration than the P1 treatment, with the highest duration of 76 days observed in the P2 treatment. The planting time influences the vegetative growth and flower attributes of marigolds.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marigold , Cultivation time and spacing , Flowering duration , Flower yield

Kaynakça

• 1. Nain, S., et al., Effect of pinching and spacing on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) under semi-arid conditions of Haryana. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 2017. 9(4), p. 2073–2078. doi: 10.31018/jans.v9i4.1491.
• 2. Lalit, B. C., et al., Effect of pinching on yield and yield attributing characteristics of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.): A review. Tropical Agrobiodiversity, 2020. 1(2), p. 57–60. doi: 10.26480/trab.02.2.
• 3. Singh, R., et al., A Review on Effect of Pinching on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Marigold. International Journal of Pure Applied Bioscience, 2019. 7(4), p. 493–501. doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.7760.
• 4. Singh, V., A. K. Singh, and A. Sisodia, Growth and Flowering of Marigold as Influenced by Pinching and Spraying of Nitrogen. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2017. 6(7), p. 2283–2287. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.268.
• 5. Ganai, S.A., et al., Diversity of arthropod fauna associated with marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) in Jammu. Joural of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 2017. 5(5), p. 1940–1943.
• 6. Bosma, T. L., et al., Sowing Dates and Priming Influence African Marigold Field Emergence. Horticulture Technology, 2003. 13(3), p. 487–493. [Online]. Available: http://horttech.ashspublications.org/content/13/3/487.abstract
• 7. Jyothi, K., et al., Studies on the Effect of Planting Dates and Levels of Pinching on Growth, Flowering and Yield in Marigold (Tagetes erecta) cv. Arka Agni. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2018. 7(11), p. 2705–2713. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.309.
• 8. Biswal, B., et al., Evaluation of phytoremediation capability of French marigold (Tagetes patula) and African marigold (Tagetes erecta) under heavy metals contaminated soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2021. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2021.1985960.
• 9. Ismail, R. F., et al., Effect of planting date and plant spacing on growth, yield and essential oil of Mexican marigold. The Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2013. 9(1), p. 330–340.
• 10. Mohanty, C. R., Influence of various planting distances on growth and flowering of Annual Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum coronarium L .). International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 2021. 9(2), p. 5081–5086.
• 11. Meena, Y., et al., Effect of planting time, spacing and pinching on growth and seed yield traits Effect of planting time, spacing and pinching on growth and seed yield traits in African marigold (Tagetes erecta) cv . Pusa Narangi Gainda. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015. 85, p. 797–801.
• 12. Weather Meta - meteoblue. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/week/meta_italy_3173524
• 13. Pratibha, C., et al., Effect of planting dates and spacing on growth and flowering of French marigold Sel. FM 786. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018. 13(37), p. 1938–1941. doi: 10.5897/ajar2015.10227.
• 14. Raju, D. V. S., K. P. Singh, and K. Swaroop, Performance of French marigold (Tagetes patula Linn.) in different planting months under Delhi conditions. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 2006. 9(3), p. 215–217.
• 15. Chanda, S. and N. Roychoudhury, The effect of time of planting and spacing on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Siracole. Horticultural Journal, 1991. 4(2), p. 53–56.
• 16. Mishra, H. P., Performance of french marigold as influenced by time of planting under North Bihar situation. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 1997. 54(3), p. 265–269.
• 17. Chaturvedi, A. K., et al., High temperature stress during flowering and grain filling offsets beneficial impact of elevated CO2 on assimilate partitioning and sink-strength in rice. Scientific Reports, 2017. pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07464-6.
• 18. Anju P. and A. K. Pandey, Effect of plant spacing on growth and flowering in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) under Budnelkhand Region. Progressive Research, 2007. 2(2) p. 70–72,
• 19. Pandey, R., et al., Studies on effects of planting dates and spacing in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.),” Progressive Horticulture, 2014. 46(1), p. 149–152.
• 20. SINGH, A. K., U. KUMAR, and A. KUMAR, Effect of planting date and spacing on performance of marigold (Tagetes erecta Linn) cv. PUSA NARANGI under North Bihar agro-ecological conditions,” International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement, 2015. 6(1), p. 16–20. doi: 10.15740/has/ijfci/6.1/16-20.
• 21. Prashanth, M. KK, P., et al., Evaluation of different African marigold (Tagetes species Linn.) genotypes for vegetative, floral and yield attributes under Southern Telangana condition. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2018. 6(5), p. 3311–3315.
• 22. Halagi, M.S., et al., Effect of plant spacing and pinching interval on growth, yield and flower quality of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) under semi-arid conditions, 2023. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(4), 2246-2254.
• 23. Ahirwar, M. K., K. Ahirwar, and M. Shukla, Effect of plant densıtıes, nitrogen and phosphorus levels on growth, yıeld and qualıty of afrıcan marıgold, 2012. 14(2), p. 153–155.
• 24. Singh, V. N., et al., Effect of Gamma Irradiation on African Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) Cv. Pusa Narangi Gainda. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 2016. 4(1), p. 36–40.
• 25. Kumar, K., et al., Effect of spacing on growth, flowering and corm production of gladiolus (Gladiolus sp.) cv. American Beauty. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 2016. 1(3), p. 550–554. doi: 10.22161/IJEAB/1.3.36.
• 26. Sreekanth, P., et al., Effect of planting time, spacing and nitrogen levels on yield and quality of African Marigold (Tagetes erecta Linn.),” Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 2006. 9(2), p. 97–101.
• 27. Mohanty, C. R., A. Mohanty, and R. Parhi, Effect of planting dates and pinching on seed traits in African Marigold cv. Sirakole, Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal, 2015. 35(4), p. 95–99. doi: 10.18805/asd.v35i4.6860.
• 28. Sharma, P., et al., Evaluation of genotypes of French marigold (Tagetes patula L) under Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh conditions. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 2019. 9(4), p. 94. doi: 10.5958/2250-0499.2019.00102.2.
• 29. Deepa, V. P., et al., Study on the growth and yield attributes of marigold (Tagetes spp.) hybrids under Dharwad condition. HortFlora Research Spectrum, 2016. 5(1), p. 43–47,
• 30. Srivastava, S. K., H. K. Singh, and A. K. Srivastava, Effect of spacing and pinching on growth and flowering of ‘Pusa Narangi Gainda’ marigold (Tagetes erecta). Indian Journal of Agriculture, 2021. 12(7), p. 1–8.
• 31. Pandey, R. K., et al., Studies on effects of planting dates and spacing in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L .). Progressive Horticulture, 2014. 46(1), 149-152.
• 32. Gaidhani, A., S. Dalal, and P. Nagre, Effect of different planting dates and pinching on growth and flowering of China aster. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2020. 8(2), p. 1120–1124. doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2q.8918.
• 33. Dilta, B. S., Y. C. Gupta, and S. J. A. J. H. Puja, Effect of different planting dates on performance of China Aster (Callistephus chinensis Nees.) varieties, 2007. 2(2), p. 245–248.
• 34. Joshna K. and P. Pal, Effect of planting date on growth, development, aerial biomass partitioning and flower productivity of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Siracole in Indo-gangetic plains of West Bengal. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 2015. 17(2), p. 151–154. doi: 10.37855/jah.2015.v17i02.28.
• 35. Jumar. K., R. Poonam and R. K. Dubey, Effect of planting time and spacing on zinnia. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=IN2005001208
• 36. Dubey, R. K., R. Kumar, and Poonam, Effect of planting time and spacing on cosmos. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 09. [Online]. Available: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=IN2005001206
• 37. Pratibha, C., Y.C. Gupta, S.R. Dhiman, and R.K. Gupta, Effect of planting dates and spacing on growth and flowering of French marigold Sel. FM 786. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018. 13(37), 1938-1941.
• 38. Parhi, R., A. Mohanty, and S. Harichandan, Performance of various characters in African marigold due to different pinching levels and planting dates. Biology, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305554928_Performance_of_various_characters_in_African_ marigold_due_to_different_pinching_levels_and_planting_dates