Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi

Şule Elmalı

doi:10.32570/ijofe.899437

Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi

Öz

Toplumu bilgilendirmek dünyada gerçekleşen bilimsel gelişmelerle ilgili farkındalık kazanmalarını sağlamak için kitlesel medya araçları ve dijital medya ortamları yoğun bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Popüler bilim dergileri toplum ve bilim arasında bir bağlantı görevi üstlenmektedir. İnsanların eleştirel düşünme ve bilim okuryazarlığı geliştirmesi konusunda ise sosyobilimsel konuların önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, “Bilim ve Teknik” popüler bilim dergisinde sosyobilimsel konularla ilgili metinlerin düzeyinin ve konu içeriğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden doküman analizi yapılan çalışmada tematik analiz yürütülmüştür. 2019 yılı mayıs ayı ve 2020 yılı mayıs ayları arasında yer alan 13 sayıdaki 288 metinden 82 tanesinin sosyobilimsel konu içerikli olduğu belirlenmiştir. İçeriklerin ise daha çok çevre kirliliği, küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliği konuları yayınlanırken, yapay zeka ve akıllı teknolojiler konularının da ön planda olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayhan, B., Baloğlu, A. G. E., & Livberber, T. (2018). Bilim ve teknoloji haberlerinin dijital medyada sunumu. 7. Uluslararası Çin'den Adriyatik'e Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, Bakü. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330442357.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206
Bilim ve Teknik (2020). Retrieved May 17, 2020, from Bilim ve Teknik Website: https://bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/dergimiz/hakkimizda.
Boubonari, T., Markos, A., & Kevrekidis, T. (2013). Greek pre-service teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and environmental behavior toward marine pollution. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44(4), 232-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.785381
Born, D. (2015). Communicating science, transforming knowledge: Insights into the knowledge communication practices of the popular science magazine GEO. Studying Science Communication, 28-33.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. . https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bowler, P. J. (2016). Discovering science from an armchair: popular science in British magazines of the interwar years. Annals of Science, 73(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2015.1061236
Buckingham, D. (2013). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. John Wiley & Sons.
Christidou, V., Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2004). Constructing social representations of science and technology: the role of metaphors in the press and the popular scientific magazines. Public Understanding of Science, 13(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044108
Cooper, C. B. (2011). Media literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science. BioScience, 61(3), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.8
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage.
Çakır, M., Irez, S., & Doğan, Ö. K. (2010). Understandings of current environmental issues: Turkish case study in six teacher education colleges. Educational Studies, 36(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690903148522
Dağhan, G., Kibar, P. N., Çetin, N. M., Telli, E., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal medya destekli bilimsel iletişimi kullanmaları üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 29(2), 258-274. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tk/issue/48742/620119
Dani, D., Wan, G., & Henning, J. E. (2010). A Case for Media Literacy in the Context of Socioscientific Issues. New Horizons in Education, 58(3), 85-98.ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ966662
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
Değirmenci, A., & Doğru, M. (2017). Türkiye'de sosyobilimsel konularla ilgili yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi: bir betimsel analiz çalışması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (44), 123-138. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/deubefd/issue/35768/400238
Dudo, A., & Besley, J. C. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PloS one, 11(2), e0148867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
Elliott, P. (2006). Reviewing newspaper articles as a technique for enhancing the scientific literacy of student‐teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1245-1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500438420
Gardner, G. E., Jones, M. G., & Ferzli, M. (2009). Popular media in the biology classroom: Viewing popular science skeptically. The American Biology Teacher, 71(6), 332-335.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Applied Thematic Analysis, 3, 20.
Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the Future. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kachan, M. R., Guilbert, S. M., & Bisanz, G. L. (2006). Do teachers ask students to read news in secondary science?: Evidence from the Canadian context. Science Education, 90(3), 496-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20113
Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139-152. https://185.248.56.66/index.php/ijemst/article/view/115
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
Klosterman, M. L. (2010). A Comparison of Secondary Science Teachers' Reported and Actual Use of Non-instructional Mass Media: Implications for Science Education and Media Literacy. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z
Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
Maksimović, M. (2017). Transforming educational environment through green internet of things (G-IoT). Trend 2017, 23, 32-35. http://www.trend.uns.ac.rs/stskup/trend_2017/radovi/T1.1/T1.1-3.pdf
Mogias, A., Boubonari, T., Markos, A., & Kevrekidis, T. (2015). Greek pre-service teachers’ knowledge of ocean sciences issues and attitudes toward ocean stewardship. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(4), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1050955
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2017). Communicating environmental science beyond academia: Stylistic patterns of newsworthiness in popular science journalism. Discourse & Communication, 11(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316683294
(NRC) National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Korpan, C. A. (2003). University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122001
Özkan, Ö. (2018). İnternet Haber Medyasında Bilim Haberlerinin Sunumu: Mars Gezegeni Örneği. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (UKSAD), 4(1), 283-303. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/intjcss/issue/38906/454667
Parkinson, J., & Adendorff, R. (2004). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.11.005
Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 162-185.
Ricci, O. (2010). Technology for everyone: representations of technology in popular Italian scientific magazines. Public Understanding of Science, 19(5), 578-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509104724
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.
Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2012). A design-based approach to fostering understanding of global climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.597453
Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2004). Media literacy—A national priority for a changing world. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204267246
Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: educational cobots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
Tolppanen, S., & Aksela, M. (2018). Identifying and addressing students' questions on climate change. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1417816
Utma, S. (2017). Bilimsel okuryazarlık: bilim iletişimi ve medyadaki bilim haberlerini doğru okumak. Journal of International Social Research, 10(50), 788-799.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409401500309
Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zimmerman, C., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., Klein, J. S., & Klein, P. (2001). Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.3109/a036854

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Şule Elmalı ^*
0000-0002-5203-6246
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Mart 2021

Kabul Tarihi

25 Haziran 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.899437

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA49EL86HP

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Elmalı, Ş. (2021). Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi. International Journal of Field Education, 7(1), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.899437

AMA

1.Elmalı Ş. Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi. IJOFE. 2021;7(1):98-111. doi:10.32570/ijofe.899437

Chicago

Elmalı, Şule. 2021. “Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: ‘Bilim ve Teknik’ Dergisi”. International Journal of Field Education 7 (1): 98-111. https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.899437.

EndNote

Elmalı Ş (01 Haziran 2021) Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi. International Journal of Field Education 7 1 98–111.

IEEE

[1]Ş. Elmalı, “Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: ‘Bilim ve Teknik’ Dergisi”, IJOFE, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 98–111, Haz. 2021, doi: 10.32570/ijofe.899437.

ISNAD

Elmalı, Şule. “Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: ‘Bilim ve Teknik’ Dergisi”. International Journal of Field Education 7/1 (01 Haziran 2021): 98-111. https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.899437.

JAMA

1.Elmalı Ş. Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi. IJOFE. 2021;7:98–111.

MLA

Elmalı, Şule. “Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: ‘Bilim ve Teknik’ Dergisi”. International Journal of Field Education, c. 7, sy 1, Haziran 2021, ss. 98-111, doi:10.32570/ijofe.899437.

Vancouver

1.Şule Elmalı. Sosyobilimsel Konuların Medyada Yer Alma Düzeyi: “Bilim ve Teknik” Dergisi. IJOFE. 01 Haziran 2021;7(1):98-111. doi:10.32570/ijofe.899437

Cited By

Newspapers in Science Communication: A Content Analysis on Science and Technology News

İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.915432