A ZIMBARDO TIME PERSPECTIVE INVENTORY ZTPI SURVEY OF JAPANESE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 55 - 66, 01.01.2018

Julıan Pıgott

Öz

Time perspectives are dimensions of psychological time which partition experience into past, present, and future frames. This paper introduces the results from a survey of 504 Japanese university students using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory ZTPI Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999 . Exploratory factor analysis was employed to explore the structural validity of the inventory. In addition, the relationship between time perspectives and self-reported, educationally relevant behavior/achievement criteria were investigated. The ZTPI scales were found to be of adequate reliability. Exploratory factor analysis offered mild support for the original ZTPI scale, and stronger support for a shortened version of the scale developed by Shimojima, Sato and Ochi 2012 . Positive correlations of medium strength were discovered between a positive future orientation and academic performance/love of studying, while a negative medium strength correlation connects a fatalistic attitude with academic performance. The research findings add to the sizable existing body of research on broad cultural differences in time perception. A comparison of mean scores suggested that Japanese university students tend to hold more negative views toward the past and be less future-oriented than their American counterparts

Kaynakça

• Apostolidis, T. Fieulaine, N., 2002. Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité. Revue Européenne de
• Psychologie Appliquée, 54(3), pp. 207-217. Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
• Bartlett, M. S., 1954. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal
• Statistical Society, 16 (series B), 296-298. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G., 2010. A question of balance: Examining relationships between time perspective and measures of well-being in the British and Russian student samples. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 24-40. doi: 10.1080/17439760903271181
• Catell, R. B., 1966. The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D.,1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7 (3), 309.
• Cope, J., Watts, G., 2000. Learning by doing: An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 6(3), pp. 104-124.
• Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., Pinheiro, J. R., 2006. Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Interamericana de Psicología. (2), pp. 139-147.
• D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., de Pascalis, V., Zimbardo, P. G., 2003. Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford Time Perspective
• Inventory (STPI)– Short Form: An Italian study. Time & Society. 12(2-3), pp. 333-347. Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L., 2010. Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 202- .207
• DeVolder, M., Lens, W., 1982. Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp. 566-571.
• Díaz-Morales, J. F. P., 2006. Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del Inventario de Perspectiva Temporal de Zimbardo. Psicothema, 18(3), pp. 565-571.
• Ferrari, & Diaz-Morales, J., 2007. Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of
• Research in Personality, 41, 707-714. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.006
• Fieulaine, N., & Martinez, F., 2011. About the fuels of self-regulation: Time perspective and desire for control in adolescents substance use. The Psychology of Self-Regulation, 102-121.
• Fraisse, P.,1963. The Psychology of Time (J. Leith, Trans.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
• Frank L. K., 1939. Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293-312.
• Hamilton, J., Kives, K., Micevski, V., & Grace, S., 2003. Time perspective and health promoting behavior in a cardiac rehabilitation population. Behavioral Medicine, 28, 132-139.
• Heidegger, M., 1927. Being and Time. Halle, Germany: Niemeyer.
• Hofstede G., 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C., 2005. Future-oriented thinking and adjustment in a nationwide longitudinal study following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 389-410.
• Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G., 2009. The social language of time: The time perspective-social network connection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 136-147. doi:10.1080/01973530902880415
• Husserl, E., 1964. Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness (J. Churchill, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana Indiana University Press.
• Kant, I., 1965. Critique of Pure Reason (N. Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Original work published ).
• Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D., 2004. Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291-305.
• Kaiser, H., 1970. A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
• Kaiser, H., 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
• Kluckhohn F. R., Strodtbeck F. L., 1961. Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
• Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., D’Alessio, M., & Gurrieri, G., 2009. Suicidal ideation and time perspective in high school students. European Psychiatry, 24, 41-46.
• Levine R., 1997. A geography of time. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Lewin, K., 1951. Field Theory in the Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.
• Luhmann N., 2002. Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V., 2006. Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72-82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
• Nuttin, J. R., 1985. Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Reseearch Method. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Pigott. J. D., 2017. Anagnorisis and regulation from afar: The effects of Significant Events on Learning Behavior.
• Proceedings ofthe 2017 International Conference on Education, Psychology, and Learning.
• Poole, B. S., 2000. On time: Contributions from the social sciences. Financial Services Review, 9, 375-387. doi:10.1016/S1057-0810(01)00076-2
• Shimojima, Y., Sato, K., Ochi, K., 2012. Factor structure of a Japanese version of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory (ZPTI). The Japanese Journal of Personality, 21(1), pp. 74-83.
• Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S., 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 22.
• Sircova, A., Sokolova, E. T., & Mitina, O. V., 2008. Адаптация опросника временной перспективы личности Ф.
• Зимбардо [Adaptation of Zimbardo time perspective inventory]. Psikhologigesky Journal, 29, 101-109. Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., Zimbardo, P. G., & 54 members of the International Time Perspective Research Project, 2014. A global look at time: A 24 country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Sage Open. Downloaded on 2017/8/2 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244013515686
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., boninger, D., & Edwards, C., 1997. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, pp. 742-752.
• Takahashi, K., Masamitsu, S., Ono, Y., Hattori, Y. (2013). Testing the Zimbardo time perspective inventory: Japanese validation study. In V. Ortuño, P. Cordeiro (Eds.) International Studies in Time Perspective. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press.
• Thurstone, L. L., 1947. Multiple Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Tripp, D., 1993. Critical incidents in teaching. Developing professional judgment. London, UK: Routledge.
• Webster, L., Mertova, P., 2007. Using narrative inquiry as a research method. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R., 2007. The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), pp. 487-504.
• Zaleski, Z., 1994. Psychology of Future Orientation. Lublin, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL. van Beek, W., Berghuis, H., Kerkhof, A. J. F. M., & Beekman, A. T. F., 2011. Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo’s time perspective inventory in psychiatry. Time & Society, 20, 364-374. doi:10.1177/09614 63X10373960
• Zimbardo, P. G., Boyd, J. N., 1999. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp. 1271-1288.
• Zimbardo, P. G., Boyd, J. N., 2008. The Time Paradox: Using the New Psychology of Time to your advantage. London: Rider.
• Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Jaffe, D., 1973. The mind is a formidable jailor: A Pirandellian prison.
• New York Times Magazine, p. 36ff.