Industrial Policy and Green Growth in a Small Island Economy: The Case of Singapore

Abstract

The concept of economic development, which is based on sustaining a welfare worthy of human dignity, has an important place in academic studies. In short, development economics, a branch of science that examines the processes of increasing the economic welfare of low and middle income countries, focuses on some fundamental questions. It focuses on basic problems such as the disparity in levels of development between countries or the state's role in development processes. This discipline has become even more important in the last hundred years. In other words, it no longer focuses only on increasing the level of welfare, but also on how to achieve and sustain environmentally sound growth. But can social welfare be increased without harming the environment, can major growth imbalances between countries be brought to a more equitable position, as well as promoting a way of life worthy of human dignity? Environmentally sensitive development has now moved from theory to practice. These practices have gone beyond voluntary efforts and continue to evolve into mandatory regulations day by day. The best example of this is the gradual transition to carbon emissions management by mandatory mechanisms based on the idea that voluntary mechanisms are insufficient. Sustainable economic policies are becoming increasingly important within these limits, revealing the necessity of development without conflicting with nature. Industrial policies are considered as an important instrument of economic development. Countries in transition from an agricultural to a postindustrial economy have implemented selective government policies. The importance of these policies was realized especially after the Second World War where they were used to repair war damages. Dani Rodrik argues that the government's support for certain economic activities more than others indicates the implementation of industrial policies. Yülek (1998), on the other hand, defines these policies as incentives applied in countries' priority industrial areas. In the 1980s, with the rise of neo liberal economics, state intervention was tried to be reduced, but in the 1990s, the mainstream economy again turned towards industrial policies. During this period, general effective horizontal industrial policies were preferred. However, further research has revealed the importance of extensive state intervention in the success of East Asian countries. In 2000s, the need for active industrial policies for late industrializing countries was highlighted. Nowadays, the issue of how to design and implement industrial policy has become important.The global economy is experiencing a transformation with the paradigm of sustainability and green growth emerging. The transformation brings significant opportunities alongside its challenges for countries. At this point, the study examines Singapore as a case study, which is an excellent lesson for countries at all stages of development that take advantage of the opportunities of green economic transformation. Singapore's development journey serves as a significant example in development economics. Despite limited natural resources and geographic constraints, Singapore has achieved notable success through innovative industrial policies and green growth strategies. By analyzing Singapore's economic development, policies, and strategies, this study aims to provide valuable insights for other economies. Singapore's experience highlights key lessons for achieving sustainable growth and implementing green industrial policies, focusing on leadership, state involvement, and adherence to national and international commitments.Through both quantitative and qualitative analysis, the study illustrates Singapore's successful development since its independence in the 1960s, highlighting its management of green policies within the context of green growth. The analysis is based on a case study, compiled and evaluated through literature studies and key indicators included in the scope. This article is extracted from my master's thesis entitled "Industrial Policy and Green Growth in a Small Island Economy: The Case of Singapore," supervised by Prof. Dr. Murat Ali Yülek, completed in 2024 (Master’s Thesis, OSTIM Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2024).

Keywords

• : Developmental Economics
• Developmental State
• Green Economy
• Industrial Policy
• Singapore
• Sustainable Development

References

1. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
2. Aiginger, K., and Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. https://tinyurl.com/y82ujas5
3. Aksu, L. (2018). İktisadi büyüme, iktisat okullarının bakış açısı ve Türkiye. IKSAD Publications.
4. Alacevich, M., and Boianovsky, M. (Eds.). (2018). The political economy of development economics: A historical perspective (Supplement). History of Political Economy.
5. Allan, B., Lewis, J. I., and Oatley, T. (2021). Green industrial policy and the global transformation of climate politics. Global Environmental Politics, 21(4), 1-19.
6. Ambroziak, A. A. (2017). Review of the literature on the theory of industrial policy. In The new industrial policy of the European Union (pp. 3-38). Springer.
7. Arlı Yılmaz, S. (2014). Yeşil işler ve Türkiye'de yenilenebilir enerji alanındaki potansiyeli: Uzmanlık tezi (Seri No. 2887). T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı.
8. Lütkenhorst, W., Vidican, G., Altenburg, T., and Pegels, A. (2014). Green industrial policy. Managing transformation under uncertainty. Discussion Paper, No. 28/2014. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199441/1/die-dp-2014-28.pdf

9. WWF. (2022). Living planet report 2022. Building a nature positive society (R. E. A. Almond, M. Grooten, D. Juffe Bignoli, and T. Petersen, Eds.). WWF.
10. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., and Lo, K. (2010). Global surface temperature change.
11. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., and Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
12. United Nations. (2023). The sustainable development goals report 2023: Special edition - Towards a rescue plan for people and planet. United Nations.
13. Claeys, G., Demertzis, M., and Papadia, F. (2019). Challenges ahead for the European Central Bank: Navigating in the dark? Monetary Dialogue, September 2019. Bruegel.
14. Taxation and Customs Union. (2023). Carbon border adjustment mechanism. European Commission. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustmentmechanism_en
15. Borel Saladin, J. M., and Turok, I. N. (2013). The green economy: Incremental change or transformation? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1614
16. Bowen, A. (2012). Green growth: What does it mean? The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, the London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wpcontent/uploads/2014/02/green-growth-environmental-scientist-dec12.pdf
17. Daedal Research. (2023). Global carbon credit market: Analysis by traded value, traded volume, segment, project category, region, size and trends with impact of COVID-19 and forecast up to 2028. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5774731/global-carbon-credit-market-analysis-traded
18. Denison, E. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us. Committee for Economic Development.
19. Dutta, S., Leon, L., and Wunsch-Vincen, S. (Eds.). (2023). Global innovation index 2023. www.wipo.int. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.46596
20. Energy Market Authority. (2023). Collaborations: Singapore Institute of Technology. https://www.ema.gov.sg/partnerships/research-and-developmentengagements/collaborations/singapore-institute-of-technology
21. Feldman, M., Hadjimichael, T., Lanahan, L., and Kemeny, T. (2016). The logic of economic development: A definition and model for investment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614653
22. Fetting, C. (2020). The European green deal. ESDN Report, December 2020. ESDN Office.
23. Frenken, K., and Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26161121
24. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., and Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018
25. Greenlaw, S. A., and Shapiro, D. (2017). Principles of microeconomics 2e. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction
26. Greenwald, B., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Keynesian, New Keynesian, and New Classical economics. Oxford Economic Papers, 39(1), 119-133. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2663132
27. Hartwell, R. M. (1990). Was there an industrial revolution? Social Science History, 14(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171333
28. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975 (1st ed.). Stanford University Press.
29. Kose, M. A., Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., and Wei, S.-J. (2010). Financial globalization and economic policies. In D. Rodrik and M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 5, pp. 4283-4359). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52944-2.00003-3
30. Krugman, P. (1994). The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 62-78.
31. Kuşat, N. (2013). Yeşil sürdürülebilirlik için yeşil ekonomi: Avantaj ve dezavantajları – Türkiye incelemesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 8(29), 4896-4916. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.81368
32. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
33. Lee Hsien Loong. (2011, October 24). Transcript of PM's speech for debate on the president's address (Document Number: 20111031008). Singapore. Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts.
34. Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., Thomsen, M., et al. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361-371.
35. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(3), 36-42. MAS. (2023). Monetary Authority of Singapore. https://www.mas.gov.sg/
36. Mechitov, A. I., Moshkovich, H. M., and Grainger, M. (2021). Lee Kuan Yew's leadership lessons from developing Singapore. International Journal of Business Strategy, 21(1), 42-51.
37. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the New Zealand Government. (2023, August). ASEAN: Regional economic outlook market intelligence report. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/market-reports
38. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore. (2023). Voluntary national reviews 2023. www.mfa.gov.sg. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/SINGAPORES-FOREIGN-POLICY/International-Issues/Singapore-Voluntary-National-Review
39. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (n.d.). Singapur siyasi görünümü. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.tr.mfa?4fa9f9c9-e9e5-49b5-8592-8b869762ccb8
40. Ministry of Trade and Industry. (2024, January 2). Singapore Gross Domestic Product (GDP) fourth quarter 2023. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/news/advgdp4q2023.ashx
41. Singapore Economic Development Board. (n.d.). Singapore's economic development. https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/our-industries/economic-overview/singaporeseconomic-development.html
42. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2019, December 3). Singapore students show well-developed thinking and reasoning skills: OECD PISA 2018 study. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20191203-singapore-students-showwell-developed-thinking-and-reasoning-skills-oecd-pisa-2018-study
43. World Economic Forum. (2015, April 22). Is education the secret to Singapore’s success? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/04/is-education-the-secret-to-singaporessuccess/
44. Kozma, R. (2011). Transforming education: The power of ICT policies. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000211842
45. Ferris, S. P., and Waldron, K. (2023). The educational system in Singapore. In S. P. Ferris and K. Waldron (Eds.), Thriving in academic leadership (Surviving and thriving in academia) (pp. 125-127). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-300-820231014
46. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2024). Overview of Singapore education system. Ministry of Education, Singapore. https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/aboutus/overview_of_singapore_education_system.pdf
47. Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., et al. (2017). Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0061-9 Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. (2021). Singapore IP strategy report 2030. https://www.ipos.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/singaporeip-strategy-report-2030-18May2021.pdf
48. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Innovation and intellectual property. https://www.wipo.int/ip-outreach/en/ipday/2017/innovation_and_intellectual_property.html
49. Ministry of Manpower Singapore. (2023). Labour market report third quarter 2023. https://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/press-releases/2023/1214-labour-marketreport-third-quarter-2023#:~:text=The%20labour%20market%20expanded%20in,increase%20was%20in%20growth%20sectors Singstat. (2023). Economy. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/searchby-theme?theme=economyandtype=data
50. MAS. (2022). Monetary Authority of Singapore. https://www.mas.gov.sg/ Doing Business 2020. (2020). World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/688761571934946384/pdf/Doing-Business-2020-Comparing-BusinessRegulation-in-190-Economies.pdf
51. Hirschl, R. (2020). City, state: Constitutionalism and the megacity. Oxford University Press.
52. Housing and Development Board. (2022/2023). About HDB. https://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/homepage
53. KOF Globalisation Index. (2023, June 12). KOF globalisation index – KOF Swiss Economic Institute | ETH Zurich. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kofglobalisation-index.html
54. Singapore Department of Statistics. (2022, January 14). Advance estimate of gross domestic product for 4th quarter 2022. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/news/gdp4q2022.ashx
55. International Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2023). World competitiveness ranking. IMD World Competitiveness Center. https://www.imd.org/centers/wcc/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness-ranking/
56. Singapore National Climate Change Secretariat. (2024). www.nccs.gov.sg. https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/singapore-and-internationalefforts/
57. National Library Board Singapore. (2023). www.nlb.gov.sg. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=f4e013e3-bdf0-4590-a80b-7533a4c7ffc0
58. National Environment Agency. (2023, October 4). Singapore sets out eligibility criteria for international carbon credits under the carbon tax regime. https://www.nea.gov.sg/media/news/news/index/singapore-sets-out-eligibilitycriteria-for-international-carbon-credits-under-the-carbon-tax-regime
59. Mun Heng, T. (2015). Singapore’s economic development in the light of modern development concepts. In Economic planning and industrial policy in the globalizing economy: Concepts, experience and prospects (pp. 125-147).
60. Petrashko, L. (2017). Industrial policy for a sustainable growth path in Ukraine. In M. Yülek (Ed.), Industrial policy and sustainable growth (pp. 11-1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3964-5_11-1
61. Rebelo, S. (1991). Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 500–521. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937740
62. Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE). (2020). 2025 handbook. https://www.nrf.gov.sg/rie-ecosystem/rie2025handbook/
63. Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469–491. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/green_industrial_policy.pdf
64. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. University of Chicago Press.
65. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press. Rowthorn, R., and Wells, J. (1987). Deindustrialization and foreign trade. Cambridge University Press.
66. Shackleton, J. R. (2013). Introduction. Economic Affairs, 33(2), 155-155. Wiley Blackwell.
67. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1884513
68. Spencer, D. (2009). The political economy of work (1st ed.).
69. Tagliapietra, S., and Veugelers, R. (2020). A green industrial policy for Europe (Blueprint Series 31). In S. Gardner (Ed.), Bruegel Blueprint Series. Bruegel.
70. Taylor, J. E., and Lybbert, T. J. (2020). Essentials of development economics, third edition (3rd ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1503ghb
71. UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://web.unep.org/greeneconomy/sites/unep.org.greeneconomy/files/field/image/green_economyreport_final_dec2011.pdf
72. United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Human development reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/ZMB
73. United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Global Knowledge Index 2023. https://knowledge4all.com/admin/2023/Methodology/GKI2023_Report_EN.pdf
74. United Nations Environment Programme. (2014). UNEP year book: Emerging issues in our global environment.
75. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2023). UNIDO industrial statistics yearbook 2023. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/unido-publications/2023-12/UNIDO_IndustrialStatistics_Yearbook_2023.pdf
76. UNSDG. (2023). https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal/countryprofiles/SGP
77. Yusof, A. M. M., Jaes, L., and Razali, N. A. (2023). Paternalistic leadership Lee Kuan Yew on Singapore developmental state. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2827(1), 030022.
78. Yülek, M. (1991). Singapur. Devlet Planlama Teşkilat Yayını.
79. Yülek, M. (1998). Asya kaplanları: Sanayi politikaları ve kalkınma. Alfa Yayınları.
80. Yülek, M. (2018). How nations succeed: Manufacturing, trade, industrial policy, and economic development. Palgrave MacMillan.
81. Yülek, M. A. (2017). On the middle income trap, the industrialization process and appropriate industrial policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 17, 325-348.
82. Yülek, M. A., and Akkemik, K. A. (2022). The developmental leader. Asia Pacific Economic Literature, 36, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12364
83. Yülek, M., and Gür, N. (2017). Foreign direct investment, smart policies, and economic growth. Progress in Development Studies, 17(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993417713272