Cooperative Learning as Formative Approach in Physical Education for All

Yıl 2016, Cilt 4 - Sayı 2, 195 - 205, 23.06.2016

Carmelo Munafo

Öz

The purpose of this article was to explore Cooperative Learning as a promising approach for the inclusion of students with disabilities in physical education (Moliterni, 2013; de Anna, 2009; Cervantes et al. 2007). Constructivist perspective is used as a theoretical framework and connection with Cooperative Learning. Research in America by Johnson & Johnson (1989) on the use and benefit of Cooperative Learning in the classroom environment have been conducted, but we are now beginning to understand the inclusive nature of Cooperative Learning in physical education(Dyson & Casey, 2012). The structure of Cooperative Learning allow for participation to occur in a student-centered learning curriculum as opposed to a teacher-centered teaching curriculum. The teacher facilitates learning activities that have the potential to provide students with a holistic education that promotes social, physical, and cognitive learning outcomes. The emphasis is on active learning that involves the processes of decision making, social interaction, and cognitive understanding for students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

social constructivism, inclusion, physical education

Field : Sport Sciences, Physical Education Type : Review Article

Öz

Kaynakça

• Antil LR, Jenkins JR, Wayne SK, Vadasy PF (1998). Cooperative Learning: Prevalence,
• conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational
• Research Journal, 35(3):419-454.
• Armitage C (2005). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical
• activity? Health Psychology, 24(3): 235-245. California: Benjamin Cummings.
• Barrett T (2000). Effects of two cooperative learning strategies on academic learning time,
• student performance, and social behavior of sixth grade physical education students.
• Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
• Carlson TB (1995). We hate gym: Student alienation from physical education. Journal of
• Teaching in Physical Education, 14(4):467-477.
• Cervantes CM, Cohen R, Hersman B, Barrett T (2007). Incorporating PACER into an
• inclusive basketball unit. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 78(7):45-50.
• Cohen EG (1994). Restructuring in the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups.
• Review of Educational Research, 64(1): 1-35.
• Cohen EG, Lotan RA (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological
• theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Comoglio M (1996).Che cos’è il Cooperative Learning. Orientamenti Pedagogici, 43(2): 259-
• Trento: Erickson
• Cothran DJ, Ennis CD (1998). Curricula of mutual worth: Comparisons of students’ and
• teachers’ curricular goals. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(3): 307-326.
• De Anna L (2009). Processi formativi e percorsi di integrazione nelle scienze motorie.
• Milano: Franco Angeli.
• Dewey J (1966). Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press
• Dodds P, Griffin LL, Placek JH (2001). A selected review of the literature on the
• development of learners’ domain-specific knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical
• Education [Monograph], 20: 301-313.
• Dyson B (2002). The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary school
• physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1): 69-85.
• Dyson B (2001). Cooperative learning in an elementary school physical education program.
• Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(3): 264-281.
• Dyson B, Rubin A (2003). How to implement cooperative learning in your elementary
• education program. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 74(1): 48-55.
• Dyson B, Strachan K (2000). Cooperative learning in a high school physical education
• program. Waikato Journal of Education, 6: 19-37.
• Dyson B, Casey A (2012) Cooperative learning in physical education: A research based
• approach. 166-175: London, UK: Routledge
• Dyson B, Ovens L, Smith W (2012). Implementing the cooperative learning model in
• physical education: the experience of the New Zealand teachers. In B.
• Dyson & A. Casey
• (Eds.), Cooperative learning in physical education .15-26: New York, NY: Routledge.
• Ennis C.D. (2000). Canaries in the coal mine: Responding to disengaged students using
• theme-based curricula. Quest, 52(2): 119-130.
• Goodyear V (2012). Physical education teachers’ top tips for using cooperative learning to
• teach secondary school physical education. Physical Education Matters, 7(3): 34 – 37.
• Goodyear VA, Casey A (2015). Innovation with change: Developing a community of practice
• to help teachers move beyond the ‘honeymoon’ of pedagogical renovation. Physical
• Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(2):186–203.
• Grineski S (1989). Children, games and pro-social behavior: Insights and connections. Journal
• of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60(8): 20-25.
• Hay KE, Barab SA (2001). Constructivism in Practice: A Comparison and Contrast of
• Apprenticeship and Constructionist Learning Environments. The Journal of the Learning
• Sciences, 10(3): 281-322.
• Johnson D, Johnson R (1975). Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
• Hall.
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina,
• MN: Interaction Book
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Johnson-Holubec E (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. (7th
• ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
• Kagan S (1990). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership,
• (4): 12-16.
• Kagan S (1992). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative
• Learning.
• Kirk D, Macdonald D (1998). Situated learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in
• Physical Education, 17(3): 382.
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York:
• Cambridge University Press.
• Locke L (1992). Changing secondary school physical education. Quest, 44(3): 361-372.
• Magnanini A (2009). Lo Sport... per tutti. Una risorsa per l'integrazione. In de Anna, L.,
• Processi formativi e percorsi di integrazione nelle scienze motorie.
• Ricerca, teorie e
• prassi.Pp.36-45 Milano: Franco Angeli.
• Moliterni P (2013). Didattica e scienze motorie. Tra mediatori e integrazione. Roma:
• Armando
• Mosston M, Ashworth S (2002). Teaching physical education. (5th ed.), Boston: Benjamin
• Cummings.
• Perkins D (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 57(3): 6-11.
• Putnam JW (1998). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in
• the classroom. (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
• Putnam JW (1998). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in
• the classroom. (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes. P.18
• Rovegno I, Bandhauer D (1997). Norms of the school culture that facilitated teacher adoption
• and learning of a constructivist approach to physical education. Journal of Teaching in
• Physical Education, 16: 401-425.
• Rovegno I, Kirk D (1995). Articulations and silences in social critical work on physical
• education: Towards a broader agenda. Quest, 47(4): 447-474.
• Sapon-Shevin MK (1994). Cooperative learning and middle schools: What would it take to
• really do it right? Theory into Practice, 33(3): 183-190.
• Siedentop D, Doutis P, Tsangaridou N, Ward P, Rauschenbach J (1994). Don’t sweat gym:
• An analysis of curriculum and instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13:
• -394.
• Slavin R (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, practice, research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
• Prentice-Hall.
• Slavin RE (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what
• we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1):43-69.
• Smith B, Markley R, Goc Karp G (1997). The effect of a cooperative learning intervention on
• the social skill enhancement of a third grade physical education class. Research Quarterly for
• Exercise and Sport, 68(Suppl.), A-68.
• Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
• Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. P.90