Research Article

Technology Leadership in Educational Organizations: A Systematic Analysis

Volume: 1 Number: 2 December 1, 2020
EN TR

Technology Leadership in Educational Organizations: A Systematic Analysis

Abstract

The use of technology in educational settings is recognized as indispensable if education is to provide 21st century skills. Since technology is an indispensable component of all schools, providing strong technology leadership, by either a school administrator or a teacher, has become a key requirement. This study aims to reveal the areas that studies in this field have focused on and analyze any gaps in the research. The study is based on three main points regarding studies of educational technology leadership: research methodologies, trends, and educational theories, approaches and standards. According to the analysis, the studies focus on the goals of technology leadership for technology integration, technology leadership competencies, technology leadership self-efficacy and technology leadership perceptions. It shows that according to the theories and standards there are studies on ISTE/NETSA, ISTE and NETSA. The findings show that the researches began in 1992, reached their highest point in 2012 with the dramatic increase in 2010 and that the majority of the studies were conducted in the USA and Turkey. This systematic review will be beneficial for scholars and practitioners to gain understanding of the research, trends and gaps.

Keywords

Teacher professional development , 21st century abilities , technology leadership , lifelong learning

References

  1. Banoğlu, K. (2011). Okul müdürlerinin teknoloji liderliği yeterlikleri ve teknoloji koordinatörlüğü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 199-213. İstanbul.
  2. Brooks-Young, S. (2002). Making technology standards work for you: A guide for school administrators. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328-340.
  4. Creighton, T. (2003). The Principal as Technology Leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  5. Fishman, B., Gomez, L., & Soloway, E. (1999). New technologies and the challenge for school leadership. Leadership & New Technologies: A White Paper for the Joyce Foundation Wingspread Meeting: “Technology’s role in Urban school Reform: Achieving Equity and Quality.”
  6. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Education Administration, 41(2), 124-143.
  7. Gulpan & Baja, (2020). Technological Leadership of 21st Century Principals of Private Secondary Schools. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications 4(4), 66-69
  8. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
  9. Haughey, M. (2006). The impact of computers on the work of the principal: Changing discourses on talk, leadership and professionalism. School Leadership and Management, 26(1), 23- 36.
  10. Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
APA
Polat, E., Yahşi, Ö., & Hopcan, S. (2020). Technology Leadership in Educational Organizations: A Systematic Analysis. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), 203-220. https://izlik.org/JA57YF82EM