Okul Müdürlerinin Öğretim Liderliği Davranışlarının İncelenmesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 2548 - 2572, 30.09.2020

Emine Bozkurt , Ramazan Cansoy

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.670655

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı okul müdürlerinin sergilediği öğretim liderliği davranışlarını incelemektir. Araştırmada fenomenoloji deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırma 2018-2019 eğitim-öğretim yılında Karabük ilinde Safranbolu ve Merkez ilçedeki ilkokul ve ortaokullarda görev yapmakta olan 14 okul müdürü ile yürütülmüştür. Katılımcılar amaçlı örneklem yöntemlerinden ölçüt ve kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme uygun olarak araştırılan fenomene ilişkin yeterli deneyime sahip olduğu düşünülen okul müdürleri arasından seçilmiştir. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formuyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliğinin bazı boyutlarında öğretim liderliği davranışlarına daha uygun davrandıklarını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik, Öğretim Liderliği, Yönetim, Okul Müdürü, Nitel Araştırma

Destekleyen Kurum

Karabük Üniversitesi

Examining Instructional Leadership Behaviors of School Principals

Öz

The aim of this research is to examine the instructional leadership behaviors of school principals. Phenomenology design was used. Interviews were carried out with 14 school principals at primary and secondary schools. The participants were selected with a purposeful sampling method. The data were collected through a semi-structured interview form. All school principals emphasized the objectives of the school in parallel with the goals determined centrally. School principals gave importance to social and cultural studies to increase the students' motivation, and they organized out-of-school activities to motivate teachers. School principals generally control annual plans and community meetings, provide support for teachers in cooperation with teachers, show sensitivity to school problems, reward successful students, and reward successful teachers with social awards. In addition, it was understood that the school principals don’t want to do the partake in activities that are not relevant to education. School principals focused on motivation, supporting school atmosphere, supply materials and rewards in terms of instructional leadership. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, Instructional Leadership, Administration, Qualitative Research, School Principal

Kaynakça

• Aksoy E. & Işık E. (2008) Instructional leadership roles of primary school principals. Journal of Social Sciences, 19.
• Aktepe V. & Buluç B. (2014) Evaluation of school administrators’ instructional leadership characteristics based on the perceptions of class teachers. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Education, 34 (2), 227-247.
• Andrews, R. L. & Soder, R. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 44 (6), 9-11.
• Ayık, A. & Şayir, G. (2014). The relation between school principals’ instructional Leadership Behaviors and Organizational Climate. E-Journal of Social Sciences, 13 (49), 253-279.
• Bartell, C. A. (1989). Outstanding secondary principals reflect on instructional leadership.” The High School Journal, 73 (2), 118–128.
• Baş, G. & Yıldırım, A. (2010). Evaluation of primary school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors according to various factors. E-Journal Of New World Sciences Academy, 5 (4), 1909-1931.
• Bayar, T. & Önder, E. (2016). Teachers’ views on the levels of showing instructional leadership behaviors by primary school principals. Journal of Academical View, 56, 183-193. Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Effective instructional leadership. Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (2), 130-141.
• Bush, T. (2018). Theories on instructional leadership and administration. (Translated by R. Sarpkaya). (First Edition). Ankara:Pegem Publishing.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2017). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Campbell, P., Chaseling, M., Boyde, W. & Shipway, B. (2018). The effective instructional leader. Professional Development in Education. DOI:10.1080/19415257.2018.1465448.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Qualitative research and research pattern according to five approaches. (Translation of the Third Edition). (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore.
• Donkor, A. K. & Asante, J. (2016). Instructional leadership of basic schools in Ghana: The case study of schools in Kwaebibirem district. American International Journal Of Contemporary Research, 6 (4), 65-75.
• Dönmez, B. (2018). The importance of the supervision of education in Turkey and the reconstruction of the supervision system. A View on Education Journal of Education and Scientific Research 14 (44), 3-9.
• Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington DC: Alber Shanker Institute.
• Fullan, M. (2001). Leading a culture of change. Accessed on 30.11.2018 on http://Michaelfullan.Ca/Wp-Content/Uploads/2016/06/13396064350.Pdf.
• Graczewski, C., Knudson, J. & Holtzman, D. J. (2009). Instructional leadership in practice: What does it look like and what influence does it have? Journal Of Education For Student Placed at Risk, 14, 72-96.
• Gümüşeli, A. İ. (2014). Management of education. First Edition. Ankara: Pegem.
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and tranformational leadership, (3), 329-351.
• Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1985). Assesing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elemantary School Journal, 86 (2), 217-247.
• Harris, A., Jones, M., Cheah, K. S. L., Devadason, E, & Adams, D. (2017). Exploring principals’ instructional leadership practices in Malaysia: Insights and implications. Journal Of Educational Administration, 55 (2), 207-221. DOI: 10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0051.
• Heck, R. H. & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33 (229). DOI: 10.1177/1741143205051055. Accessed on 01.02.2019 on this adress: http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4beb/536254138a8d8e5ecb6ac0f5b271881c6975.pdf
• Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2015). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. Translation Editor Selahattin Turan. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Kılınç, A. Ç. (2016). Modern Leadership Approaches. In N. Güçlü’s work, Leadership in the Field of Educational Administration (69-96). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Kılınç, A. Ç. & Cansoy, R. (2017). Education and Assignment of School Administrators in Turkey. In A. Üstün & A. Bayar’s work. Turkish Educational System and Administrating Schools (57-84). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. (ERIC NO: ED 356526). 430-443.
• Manaseh, A. M. (2016). Instructional leadership: The rol of heads of schools in managing the instructional programme. International Journal of Educational Leadrship and Management, 4 (1), 30-47.
• MEB (Ministry of National Education), (1973). Officialt Gazette, 5 (12). Edition, 14574.
• MEB, (2000). Definition of the duties of principals in primary schools affiliated with MEB. Journal of Declarations, 63 (2508).
• MEB, (2013). Instructions on awarding ministry of national education’s staff. Journal of Declarations, 2666.
• Merriam, S. B. (2015 Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Fifth Edition) Translated by S. Turan. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Miller, R. J., Goddard, Y. L. & Goddard, R. (2010). Instructional leadership: A pathway to eacher collaboration and student achievement. Texas A&M University, Educatiın Leadership Research Center.
• Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Education and Training Policy Division. Accessed on 30.11.2018 on www.oecd.org/edu/teacherpolicy NASSP (National Association of Secondary School Principal), (2007). Changing role of the middle level and high school leader: Learning from the past-preparing fort the future. Reston: Virginia.
• Ovando, M. N. & Cavazos, M. (2004). Principals’ instructional leadership in successful Hispanic majority high schools. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2 (3), 7-24.
• Özdemir, N. & Kavak, Y. (2017). School Administrators in the Conundrum of Academical Success. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Özdemir, S. & Sezgin, F. (2002). Effective schools and instructional leadersship. Kyrgyzstan Turkey Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 266-282.
• Polatcan, M. & Cansoy, R. (2018). Effective school researches in Turkey: Analysis of Empirical Researches. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8 (3), 8-24.
• Saban, A., & Ersoy, A. (2017). Qualitative research patterns in education. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Sağır, M. & Emişoğlu, S. P. (2013). The degrees of encountering problems by primary school administrators and the problems they encounter. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 39-56.
• Sezgin, F. (2013). School as a social system. In S. Özdemir (Ed), Theory and Practice in the Administration of Education, (p. 63-100). Ankara:Pegem Publishing. Short, P. M. & Spencer, W. A. (1989). Principal instructional leadership. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
• Sim, Q. C. (2011). Instructional leadership among principals of secondary schools in Malaysia. Educational Research, 2 (12), 1784-1800. Şişman, M. (1997). Instructional leadership behaviors of school principals. 4th Congress of National Educational Sciences. Declarations. University of Anadolu Journal of the Faculty of Education. Eskişehir.
• Şişman, M. (2014). Instructional leadership. (Fifth Edition). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Tabancalı, E. & Cengiz, F. (2018). The effects of instructional leadership behaviors of school principals on teachers’ job satisfactions. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14 (2), 481-499.
• Türnüklü, A. (2000). A qualitative research method that could be used in educational sciences researches: Interviewing. Theory and Practice in the Administration of Education, 24, 543-599.
• Ünsal, H. (2017). The Method of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. In G. Yüksel ve S. Büyükalan Filiz (Ed). Management of the Classroom (p. 341-380). Ankara: Pegem Academi.
• Weber. M. (1993). Essays in Sociology. Translated by. T. Parla. İstanbul: Hürriyet Vakfı Publishing.