<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">0578-9745</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2687-4113</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>İstanbul Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26650/annales.2024.75.0009</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Law in Context (Other)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Hukuk (Diğer)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                                                            <article-title>Implementation of the Concept of &quot;Bring Your Own Device&quot; (BYOD) within the Scope of Labour Law</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9991-9492</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Ayan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Hasan Alparslan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Necmettin Erbakan University, Law Faculty, Department of Labour and Social Security Law</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20250106">
                    <day>01</day>
                    <month>06</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </pub-date>
                                                    <issue>75</issue>
                                        <fpage>225</fpage>
                                        <lpage>253</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20240716">
                        <day>07</day>
                        <month>16</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20240821">
                        <day>08</day>
                        <month>21</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1951, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1951</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                                        <abstract><p>The process of digitalisation has a profound impact on the global landscape. The ramifications of this phenomenon on the workforce are inescapable. Technological developments exert an influence on employment relationships. From this point forward, information technology (IT) devices will become a requisite component for employees in order to fulfil the obligations inhe-rent to an employment contract. It is therefore becoming more common for employees to use the devices they bring to the workplace. The concept of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) refers to the use of an employee’s personal IT devices for work-related purposes. Concurrently, this situa-tion leads to issues within the employment relationship. To resolve these issues, it is essential to consider the BYOD concept within the context of labour law. The aim of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of the BYOD concept in employment relationships in comparison with German and Turkish labour law. In consideration of the nature of BYOD, only situations of the utilisation of IT devices will be addressed, and the use of other work resources will not be subject to evaluation. Although there is no direct court decision on the BYOD, the decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the Court of Cassation, as well as the German Federal Labour Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union, which pertain to this concept, will be included in this study. As the primary focus of this article is on the BYOD concept, a concise overview of alternative concepts is provided. After this juncture, the employer’s right of the management and workplace practises will be analysed within the context of BYOD. In the context of the use of personal IT devices within the framework of the employment relationship, certain issues emerge that affect the work and rest periods of employees. In addition, the BYOD application is inextricably lin-ked to the issue of personal data. It is an inevitable consequence of the BYOD that an emplo-yee’s personal data, in conjunction with third parties, will be on the IT devices. Therefore, mea-sures have been developed to protect personal data on IT devices. These topics will be explai-ned under mobile device management (MDM) tools. The final issue to be addressed is the legal status of software on the employee’s IT devices. In this context, the issues of intellectual pro-perty rights and licencing agreements will also be discussed in a separate section dedicated to the BYOD.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>BYOD</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Types of BYOD</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Employment Contract</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Employer’s Liability</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Employee Claims</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Appropriate Remuneration</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Mobile Device Management (MDM)</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                                                    </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arbek Ö, Fikir ve Sanat Eserlerine İlişkin Lisans Sözleşmesi (Yetkin Yayınları 2005) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aydıncık Ş, Fikri Haklara İlişkin Lisans Sözleşmeleri (Arıkan 2006) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barton DM, ‘Betriebliche Übung und private Nutzung des Internetarbeitsplatzes „Arbeitsrechtliche Alternativen“ zur Wiedereinführung der alleinigen dienstlichen Verwendung’ [2006] NZA 460 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bartz S and Grotenrath M, ‘„Bring Your Own Device“-Gerate in inlemen Ermittlungen’ [2019], CCZ 184. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baycık G, Türk-İsviçre Hukukunda İşçinin Hukuki Sorumluluğu (Yetkin Yayınları 2015) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baysal U, ‘İşçiye Ait Taşınabilir İletişim Cihazlarının İş Amaçlı Kullanılması’ [2018] Sicil İş Hukuku Dergisi 65 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bertram A and Falder R, ‘Datenschutz im Home Office-Quadratur des Kreises oder Frage des guten Willens?’ [2021], ArbRAktuell 95. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Centel, T. 2017. Introduction to Turkish Labour Law (Springer 2017) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chandna-Hoppe K, ‘Essentielle Arbeitsmittel und mobile Arbeit’ [2023] RdA 152 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Çatalkaya DU, ‘Kişisel Yaşamı Kapsamında İşçinin, İşverence “Ulaşılabilir Olmama” Hakkı’ (2016) 74 Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 737 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Çelik N, and others, İş Hukuku Dersleri (36th edn, Beta Yayınevi 2023) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Civan OE, İşçinin Yan Yükümlülükleri (Beta Yayınevi 2021) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Conrad I and Schneider J, ‘Einsatz von „privater IT” im Unternehmen Kein privater USB-Stick, aber „Bring your own device” (BYOD)?’ [2011] ZD 153 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">W. Daubler, Digitalisierung undArbeitsrecht (7th edn, Bund Verlag 2020) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dereli T, Soykut Sarıca YP and Taşbaşı A, Labour Law in Turkey (3rd edn, Kluwer Law International 2023) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Doğan S, İş Hukukunda İşçinin İş ve Aile Yaşama Uyumunun Sağlanması (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2022) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dursun Ateş S, İşverenin Yönetim Hakkı (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2019) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ekmekçi Ö, Korkusuz MR and Uğur Ö, Turkish Individual Labour Law (2nd edn, Onikilevha Yayıncılık 2023) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Elbir N, Kişiliğinin Korunması Bağlamında İşçiye Ait Kişisel Verilerin Korunması (Yetkin Yayınları 2020) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Emrağ SE, Yararlılık İlkesi (Onikilevha Yayıncılık 2022) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Faas T, ‘WhatsApp &amp; Outlook auf dem beruflichen Smartphone: Haftungsrisiken und Auswege’ [2018] ArbRAktuell 594 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ganiyu, S.O. and Jimoh RG, ‘Characterising Risk Factors and Countermeasures for Risk Evaluation of Bring Your Own Device Strategy’ (2018) 7 International Journal of Information Security Science, 49 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Göpfert B, Wilke E. ‘Nutzung privater Smartphones für dienstliche Zwecke’ [2012]. NZA 765. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Grieger F. ‘Bring Your Own Device in Der Unternehmenspraxis’ [2023], MMR 168. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Günther J and Böglmüller M (2015) ‘Arbeitsrecht 4.0 - Arbeitsrechtliche Herausforderungen in der vierten industriellen Revolution’ [2015] NZA 1025 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hamdi M, Astarlı M and Baysal U, İş Hukuku (7th edn, Lykeion 2022) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Herrnleben G, ‘BYOD - die rechtlichen Fallstricke der Software-Lizenzierung für Unternehmen’ [of] MMR 205 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hoppe C (2023) ‘Bring your own device (BYOD)’ in Stefan Kramer (ed), IT-Arbeitsrecht (3rd edn, CH BECK 2023) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hüseyinli N and Ünal E, ‘Avrupa Birliği adalat Divanı Kararı Işığında, Türk İş Hukuku’nda Çalışma Sürelerinin Kayıt Altına Alınması’ (2024) 7 Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 44 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kascherus S and Pröpper M, ‘Bring your own device (BYOD) - Mitbestimmung bei der Nutzung privater technischer Gerate’ [2021], Betriebs-Berater 756 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kılıç Ş, ‘Employment Law’ in Şebnem Kılıç (ed), Introduction to Turkish Business Law (Peter Lang 2022) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klocke D and Hoppe S (2022) ‘Der Anspruch auf essenzielle Arbeitsmittel’ [2022] NZA-RR 515 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koch FA, ‘Arbeitsrechtliche Auswirkungen von „Bring your own Device“ - Die dienstliche Nutzung privater Mobilgerate und das Arbeitsrecht’ [2012] ITRB 35 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Korkusuz MR and Uğur Ö, ‘Turkish Individual Labour Law’ in M Refik Korkusuz and Ferna İpekel Kayalı (eds), Turkish Private Law (3rd edn, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2024) 114 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Küzeci E and Kılıç Ş, ‘6698 Sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu’nun İş Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi: Veri Sorumlusu, Veri İşleyen ve Diğer Aktörler’ (2019) 16 Legal İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Dergisi 947 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lee JH and Tinmaz H, ‘A Perceptional Analysis of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for Educational or Workplace Implementations in a South Korean Case’ (2019) 6 Participatory Educational Research 51 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lipp K, ‘Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) - Das neue Betriebsmittel’, Law as a service (LaaS): Recht im Internet- und Cloud-Zeitalter [Tagungsband Herbstakademie 2013] (OlWIR, Oldenburger Verlag für Wirtschaft, Informatik und Recht 2013) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Monsch C, Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): Rechtsfragen der dienstlichen Nutzung arbeitnehmereigener mobiler Endgerate im Unternehmen (Duncker &amp; Humblot 2017) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Müller F. ‘Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) im öffentlichen Dienst’ [2021] öAT 23 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Okur Z, İş Hukuku’nda Elektronik Gözetleme (Legal Yayıncılık 2013) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pollert D. ‘Arbeitnehmer-Smartphone als Betriebsmittel-ein kostensparendes Modeli?’ NZA-Beilage 152 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Raif A and Nann P, ‘Arbeitsrecht 4.0 - Möglichkeiten und Hürden in der digitalen Arbeitswelt’ [2016] GWR 221 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şahan G, Bilgisayar Programı İmâl Sözleşmesi (Yetkin Yayınları 2016) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Savaş Kutsal FB, İşçinin Ulaşılabilir Olmama Hakkı (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2024) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schmidt B and Roschek A-K, ‘Datenschutz Im Anwaltlichen Home- Und Mobile-Office’ [2021], NJW 367. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sümer HH, İş Hukuku Uygulamaları (7th edn, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2019) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Süzek S, İş Hukuku (23rd edn, Beta Yayınevi 2023) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wisskirchen G, Schiller JP. ‘Aktuelle Problemstellungen im Zusammenhang mit „Bring Your Own Device“’ [2015]. Der Betrieb 1163 google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yamakoğlu E, Bilişim Teknolojilerinin Kullanımının İş Sözleşmesi Taraflarının Fesih Hakkına Etkisi (Onikilevha Yayıncılık 2020) google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref50">
                        <label>50</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zöll O and Kielkowski JB, ‘Arbeitsrechtliche Umsetzung von „Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD)’ [2012] Betriebs-Berater, 2625. google scholar</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
