Nefret Suçlarının Önlenmesi için Ön Koşul Olarak Etkili Kovuşturma

Öz

Makedonya’da nefret suçlarıyla mücadele konusunda en ciddi sorun, bu tür vakaların çoğunlukla nefret suçları olarak değil, adi suçlar olarak değerlendirilip suçun arkasındaki gerçek saikin tanınmamasından kaynaklanmaktadır. Bundan dolayı, çoğu zaman ülkedeki resmi rakamlara göre nefret suçu oranı gerçek durumu yansıtmamaktadır.

Bu makale, nefret suçlarının sorunun tanınması ve gelecekte bu suçların önlenmesi için etkili bir biçimde kovuşturulmasının önemini analiz edecektir. Kurumsal yaklaşım olmaksızın, bu suçların sadece devam etmesi değil, aynı zamanda bu tür suçların resmi verilere görünür olmamasıyla birlikte sorunun çözülmesi yerine maalesef daha karmaşık hale getirmektedir.

Makalede, Makedonya’daki nefret suçlarının yasal düzenlemeleri ve nefret suçlarının etkili bir şekilde kovuşturma amacı ile daha iyi bir mevzuat sağlanması yönündeki çabaları incelenecekir. Resmi ve resmi olmayan raporların taraması yapılıp analiz edilecek ve bölgesel ülkelerdeki nefret suçlarının kovuşturulmasıyla karşılaştırması yapılacaktır.

Sonuçlar ve tavsiyeler, karşılaştırmalı araştırma sonucu ortaya çıkan yasal değişiklikler ve çözümlerin Makedonya’daki nefret suçlarının kovuşturulmasıyla ilgili gelişmelere nasıl katkıda bulunabileceği konusunda fikir sunacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nefret suçları,nefret söylemi,kovuşturma

Effective Prosecution of Hate Crimes as a Precondition for Their Prevention

Öz

The most serious problem in regard to dealing with hate crime in Macedonia is the fact that in the majority of cases, these crimes are not presented as hate crimes but as “normal” crimes lacking the recognition of the true motivation behind them. Thus the official hate crime rate in this country typically does not represent the true situation. This article will analyze the importance of effective prosecution of hate crimes, both for the recognition of the problem and for future prevention of these crimes. It is evident that without institutional action these crimes will not only continue to happen, but they will also continue to be “hidden” from the official data, which unfortunately, does not solve but rather complicates the problem. The article will analyze the legal regulation of hate crimes in Macedonia and the efforts that are being made to provide better legislation with the aim of effectively prosecuting such crimes. The official and shadow reports will be analyzed in a desk research method and comparison will be made in regard to the prosecution of hate crimes in the regional countries. Conclusions and recommendations will offer ideas about how the legislative amendments and solutions found in comparative practice can contribute to improvement in regard to prosecuting hate crimes in Macedonia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hate speech,prosecution,Hate crimes

Kaynakça

1. Report on the comparative analysis of national legislations on hate crimes (2015). Skopje: Unpublished internal document prepared for the National Working Group on Hate Crimes.
2. Kanevcev, Metodija, Criminal Code - updated integral text (Stobi Trejd: (2015).
3. Vlado Kambovski, Criminal Law - General Part (Kultura 2004).
4. Vlado Kambovski, Commentary on the Criminal Code or Republic of Macedonia (Matica 2011).
5. Vlado Kambovski, Draft-amandments on the provisions of the Criminal Code that refere to hate crimes. (Skopje 2016) Unpublished internal document prepared for the National Working Gorup on Hate Crimes.
6. Gordan Kalajdziev, Gordana Buzarovska, Criminal Procedure Code (Akademik 2011).
7. Agenda of the Study Visit of NWGHC in Zagreb, June 1-3. (2015). Unpublished internal document prepared for the National Working Group of Hate Crimes in RM.
8. Besa Arifi, ‘Hate Crimes in UK and in Poland - A Comparative Analysis’ (2015). Skopje: Unpublished internal document prepared for the National Working Group on Hate Crimes.

9. Besa Arifi ‘Presidential Pardon Debunks Fragility of Macedonian State Institutions’ (Balkans in Europe Policy Blog 9 June 2016) accesed: 25 June 2016.
10. Besa Arifi ‘Rights of Victims of Hate Crimes’ (2015) Second International Scientific Conference, Social Change in the Global World – Proceedings ( 217-230).
11. HM Government London UK. Delivering the Government’s hate crime action plan. (2014). Challenge It, Report It, Stop It.
12. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in RM. ‘Observation, mapping and information on hate crimes, special analysis for the year 2013’. Skopje: 2014 Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in RM.
13. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in RM. ‘Annual report on hate crimes in the Republic of Macedonia for 2014’. Skopje 2015: Helsinki committee for human rights of the Republic of Macedonia.
14. Identoba and Others v. Georgia, 73235/12 (ECtHR May, 2015).
15. Vlado Kambovski, ‘Proposal for the formation of a working group for the revision of the legal provisions concerning hate crimes and preparation of recommendations for their implementation by competent institutions’. Skopje 2015: Unpublished internal document prepared for the National Working Group on Hate Crimes.
16. OSCE-ODIHR. ‘Comments on Draft Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Criminal Code of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Regarding Bias-Motivated Crimes based on an unofficial English translation of the draft amendments provided by the OSCE Mission to Skopje’. Warsaw 2016: OSCE-ODIHR.
17. OSCE-ODIHR. Hate Crime Laws A Practical Guide (Warsaw 2009).
18. Project for the American Jewish Committee Berlin, Study on National Legislative Efforts to Prevent and Combat Hate Crime. Berlin (Hogan Lovells International LLP, 2009).
19. The European Commission, ‘The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2013 Progress Report’. (16 Ovtober 2013) Accessed 7 August, 2016, from European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2013/package/mk_rapport_2013.pdf
20. The European Commission. (2014, October 8). The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2014 Progress Report. Retrieved August 7, 2016, from The European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-the-former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia-progress-report_en.pdf
21. The European Commission. (2015, November 11). The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2015 Progress Report. Retrieved August 7, 2016, from The European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia.pdf
22. UN General Assembly, Human Rights Council. (2014, March 26). Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Retrieved August 8, 2016, from UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner: .https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/125/78/PDF/G1412578.pdf?OpenElement
23. Winterbourne View ‘abuse’ hospital closes on Friday. (2011, June 24). Retrieved August 9, 2016, from BBC News: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-13891855
24. Winterbourne View ‘failed to protect people’. (2011, July 18). Retrieved August 9, 2016, from BBC News: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-14181646