Dilbilim 0255-674X 2718-0042 İstanbul Üniversitesi 10.26650/jol.2023.1391550 Linguistics (Other) Dilbilim (Diğer) Orthographic Errors in English Abstracts Written by Turkish Researchers https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-0681 Bal Dilara SAKARYA UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4138-5528 Demirel Fakiroğlu Gözde ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF LETTERS, DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS 12 29 2023 40 89 96 11 15 2023 12 22 2023 Copyright © 1976, Dilbilim 1976 Dilbilim

This study aims to analyze the orthographic errors in English abstracts written by Turkish authors. As foreign language learners, Turkish authors write the abstracts of their articles in English. The majority of journals make writing English abstracts obligatory, even for Turkish articles, and authors’ academic writing competence is demonstrated through these abstracts. Half of the authors in this study are female, and half are male. This study’s findings are partly based on a master’s thesis, according to which foreign language users make different types of errors in their academic writing. The current study only evaluates the orthographic errors, which include spelling errors, consonant and vowel combination errors, and the misuse of articles and prepositions.

 Abstract academic writing error analysis foreign language orthographic errors Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursingplus open, 8 (14). google scholar Caravolas, M. ve Samara, A. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Ed.), in The Oxford handbook of reading (s. 326-343). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics inLanguage Teaching, 5(1-4). https://doi.Org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 google scholar Corder, S. P. (1971). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. google scholar Drury, D. A. (1969). Homographs and Pseudo-Homographs. Word Ways, 2 (3), 146-154. google scholar He, H. (2016). A Computer-aided analysis on word form errors in college English writing a corpus-based study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 11(03), 4. google scholar Kazazoğlu, S. (2020). The Impact of L1 Interference on Foreign Language Writing: A Contrastive Analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1177-1188 google scholar Murtiana, R. (2019). An Analysis of Interlingual and Intralingual Errors in EFL Learners’ Composition. Journal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies. 4 (2), 204-216. google scholar Richard, J. C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. google scholar Richards J. C. (1974). Error Analysis. Longman google scholar Woods, D. (1989). Error correction and the improvement of language form. TESL Canada Journal, 6(2), 60-72. google scholar Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O. ve Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29(4), 600-618. google scholar