Comparison of the Anti-Legionella Fill Material against Standard Polypropylene Fill Material in Model Cooling Tower Water System

Year 2020, Volume: 79 Issue: 1, 62 - 66, 17.06.2020

Irfan Turetgen Cansu Vatansever

Abstract

Objective: Cooling towers are heat exchangers which are utilized in specific industrial devices. They possess the potential to support Legionella bacteria. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of biocide impregnated polymer against regular polypropylene polymer in terms of anti-Legionella features during a 120-day period. Materials and Methods: To reduce the bacterial colonization in towers, anti-Legionella splash fill and regular polypropylene splash fill material were tested to compare anti-Legionella activity and biofilm formation potential within a 120-day period using a lab-scale recirculating cooling tower model system. The system was experimentally infected with Legionella suspension and operated continuously for 120 days. Results: Legionella colonization occurred on both test material surfaces beginning at the first month. Legionella counts on surfaces were increased over time on standard polypropylene surfaces. The product with anti-Legionella activity showed significantly lower Legionella colonization in comparison to standard polypropylene fill. Conclusion: The product with anti-Legionella activity has a significant biocidal effect against surface-associated Legionella under the above-mentioned conditions which mimics cooling tower water systems. Product seems to facilitate effective control program criteria against Legionella colonization in cooling towers.

Keywords

Legionella, cooling tower, fill material, biofilms, Legionella pneumophila

Supporting Institution

This work was supported by Research Fund of the Istanbul University.

Project Number

26088

References

• 1. Kadaifciler DG, Demirel R. Fungal biodiversity and mycotoxigenic fungi in cooling-tower water systems in Istanbul, Turkey. J Water Health 2017; 15: 308-20.
• 2. Turetgen I, Vatansever C. Survival of biofilm-associated Legionella pneumophila exposed to various stressors. Wat Environ Res 2015; 87: 227-32.
• 3. Dennis PJL. A Laboratory Manual for Legionella. USA, Chichester: Wiley and Sons; 1988.
• 4. Yu VL. Could aspiration be the major mode of transmission for legionella? Am J Med 1993; 95: 13-5.
• 5. Fitzhenry R, Weiss D, Cimini, D, Balter S, Boyd C, et al. Legionnaires’ disease outbreaks and cooling towers in New York City, New York. Emerg Infect Dis 2017; 23: 1769-76.
• 6. Italy [online] https://www.thelocal.it/20180918/italy-legionella-outbreak-identified-cooling-towers (Accessed 11 January 2020)
• 7. Miyashita N, Higa F, Aoki Y, Kikuchi T, Watanabe A. Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups in patients with culture-confirmed Legionella pneumonia. J Infect Chemo 2020; 26(5): 411-7.
• 8. Vatansever C, Turetgen I. Investigating the effects of different physical and chemical stress factors on microbial biofilm. Water SA 2018; 44: 308-17.
• 9. Costerton JW. Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimic Agents 1999; 11 (1): 217-21.
• 10. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15(2): 16793.
• 11. Kadaifciler DG, Demirel R. Fungal contaminants in man-made water systems connected to municipal water. J Wat Health 2018; 16(2): 244-52.
• 12. Kim J, Park HD, Chung S. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules 2012; 17: 9818-34.
• 13. Simões M, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ. A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. Food Sci Technol 2010; 43 (4) 573-83.
• 14. Momba MNB, Kfir R, Venter N, Cloete TE. An overview of biofilm formation in distribution systems and its impact on the deterioration of water quality. Water SA 2000; 26: 59-66.
• 15. Taylor M, Ross K, Bentham R. Legionella, protozoa, and biofilms: interactions within complex microbial systems. Microb Ecol 2009; 58: 538-47.
• 16. Turetgen I. Reduction of microbial biofilm formation using hydrophobic nano-silica coating on cooling tower fill material. Water SA 2015; 41: 295-9.
• 17. Elbourne A, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP. Nano-structured antimicrobial surfaces: From nature to synthetic analogues. J Colloid Interface Sci 2017; 50 (8): 603-16.
• 18. Onan M, Hoca S, Sungur E. The effect of short-term drying on biofilm formed in a model water distribution system. Microbiol 2018; 87: 857-64.
• 19. Bruellhoff K, Fiedler J, Möller M, Groll J, Brenner RE. Surface coating strategies to prevent biofilm formation on implant surfaces. Int J Artif Organs 2010; 33(9): 646-53.
• 20. Paranjape K, Bédard É, Whyte LG, Ronholm J, Prévost M, Faucher SP. Presence of Legionella spp. in cooling towers: the role of microbial diversity, Pseudomonas, and continuous chlorine application. Wat Res 2020; 169: 115252
• 21. Walker T, Canales, M, Noimark, S, Page K, Parkin. I, et al. A light-activated antimicrobial surface is active against bacterial, viral and fungal organisms. Scientific Reports 2017; doi:10.1038/s41598017-15565-5.
• 22. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49: 1-7.
• 23. Ahonen M, Kahru A, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Kõljalg S, et al. Proactive Approach for Safe Use of Antimicrobial Coatings in Healthcare Settings: Opinion of the COST Action Network AMiCI. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(4): 36-44.
• 24. Turetgen I, Sanli Yürüdü NO, Norden I. Biofilm formation comparison of the Sanipacking cooling tower fill material against standard polypropylene fill material in a recirculating model water system. Turk J Biol 2012; 36(3): 313-8.
• 25. Damian L, Paţachia S. Antimicrobial polypropylene as material for safe water supply. Bull Transilvania Uni of Braşov 2016; 9(1): 41-8.
• 26. De Carvalho CCR. Biofilms: recent developments on an old battle. Recent Patents Biotechnol 2007; 1(1): 49-57.