Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR

Yıl 2012, Sayı: 21, 1 - 27, 12.12.2012

Öz

This article focuses on the diverging and converging interests of the European  Union and Russia on  Eurasian  Project  especially concerning the great game on energy politics just after the Cold War. It was discussed the post-Soviet era political relations between the EU and Russia within the axis of the Commonwealth of the Independent States. While the Caucasus had become  the new "Black Silk Road" where the transportation  routed  for oil and gas from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea and marketed  in Europe, the perception  in the region was that whoever control the Caucasus would control the pipelines. Russia had made clear that the Caucasus and Central Asia was one of its top strategic priorities. The oil and gas reserves of t he  Eurasia was vital  to Western geo-strategic and economic interests too. So democracy  based pubIic diplomacy of the European  Union  has insisted that they have the potential  to secure prosperity and economic growth bolstered by low oil  prices. ln addition, these resources were key to ensu ring revenues and the sovereignty of the Newly Independent States with  them. The wealth brought  by oil could  fuel both  economic and democratic development in Eurasia and fostered the independence and freedom of countries which served in turn as an obstacle to potential Russian  imperial expansion . On the other hand, how Russian imperialism in Eu rasian
Project reacted his situation was also analysed.
The
R ussian  military and  political  stablishment was attempting to impose a sphere of  influence on the CIS and to secure control of the region's energy as well as Western
 
and regional  countries. Control over the region's energy resources and export routes out of the Eurasian hinterland was quickly becoming one of the central issues in the post-Cold War politics. Like the "Great Game" of the early 20'11 century, in which the geopolitical interests of the British  Empire and Russia had clashed over the Caucasus region and Central Asia, today's struggle between  Russia and the West turned  on who controls the oil  reserves  in Eurasia. The public d iplomacy of European Union was trying to ensure that Russia
was 
not a dominant, but rather an equal partner in developing the oil resources of the region. EU wanted Russian
oil and gas companies should be allowed to participate in the develop­ment of Eurasian energy resources on an equitable basis with other countries in the region. There was also a kind of coordination and cooperation between the EU and United States of America, much of their work  was done on the basis of the New Transatlantic Agenda.

Kaynakça

  • Aslanhan, Berk, "Rusya' nın Yeni Kuzey Kafkasya Projesi ", Politika ve Kültür Araştırmaları Grubu, http://www.politikkultur.org/?&Bid=336618 Blank, Stephen, "Energy, Economics and Security in Central Asia", CentroI Asian Survey, vol: 14, no:3 ,1995. Cohen, Ariel , "Yeni Büyük Oyun Avrasya'da Boru Hattı Siyaseti", Avrasya Etüdleri, cilt:1, İlkbahar 1996. Cohen, Ariel, Russian Imperialism: Development and Decline, (New York: Praeger Publications, 1996). Croissant, Michael, "Transkatkasya'da Petrol ve Rus Emperyalismi", Avra­sya Etüdleri, cilt:1 , İlkbahar, 1996. Caşın,Mesut Hakkı, Novgorod Knezliği'nden XXI. Yüzyıla RUS İMPARATORLUK STRATEJİSİ, (İstanbul: Okumuş Adam Yayınları, Nisan 2006). Dawisha, Karen, "Russian Foreign Policy in the Near Abroad and Beyond'', Current History , vol:95, no:603, October 1992. Delegation of the European Commission to the United States's of Amerika website: http://www.eurunion.org/eu/ Dugin, Aleksandr, Rus Jeopolitiği Avrasyacı Yaklaşım, Vügar İmanov( çev.), (İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, Temmuz 2003). Elst, M. "The Protection of National Minorities in the Council of Europe and the Commonwealth of lndependent States. A Comparison in Standard Setting " in: K. Malfliet and R. Laenen (eds), Minority Policy in Central and Eastern Europe- The Link between Domestic Policy, Foreign Policy and European Integration, (Leuven: Institute for European Policy, 1998). Fiona Hill, "The Caucasus and Central Asia: How the United States and Its Allies Can Stave off a Crisis", http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/05a­sia_hill.aspx Gasimov, Musa, "Rusya'nın Azerbaycan Politikası" Avrasya Dosyası , cilt:7, sayı:4, Kış 2001-2002. Gertz, Bill , "Russian Agents Teach Iranian Spies",The Washington Times, November 9, 1995. Hatipoğlu, Esra, "Avrupa Birliği- Orta Asya İlişkilerinde Yeni Bir Stratejiye Doğru (mu?), Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies vol:3 no:5, 2008, Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu USAK http://www.usak.org.tr/dosyalar/dergi/mtpdluxCpQkZmeLfeVlDVtClntLFoP.pdf Ian Breenmer and Antony Ricters, "The Perils of Sustainable Empire ", Transition, March 15, 1994. Igor Gali, V.l. Groov- G.A. Vasilyev, O.S.Senin, Sovyetler Birliği Neden/ Nasıl Yıkıldı, Arif Berberoğlu( derleyen ve Rusçadan çeviren), (Ankara: Phoenix Yayınları, Eylül 2008). Jopp, Mathias and Barbara Lippert, Towards a Solution of the Baltic Issue: the EU's Role", in: States Mathias Jopp& Sven Arnswald (eds), The European Union and the Baltic States Visions, Interests and Strategies for the Baltic Sea Region, Program on the Northern Dimension of the CFSP, vol:2, (Helsinki&Bonn: Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti& Institut für Europaische Politik, 1998). Kasım, Kamer, Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Kafkasya, (İstanbul: USAK Yayınları, 2009). " Kafkas Cephesi 'nde Yeni Bir Şey Yok!", Diplomatik Gözlem, Http://www.diplomatikgozlem.com/haber_oku.asp?id=3857 Kuloğlu ,Armağan, "Rusya Federasyonunun Yeni Kaftkasya Politikasi", Stratejik Analiz, cilt:1, sayı:3 Mayıs 2000 . Malfliet, Katlijn,"The Commonwealth of Independent States: Russian Ambitions Disguised in a European (Eurasian) Project?", in: Tom Casier & Katlijn Malfliet (eds), Is Russia A European Power? The Position Of Russia in a New Europe, ( Belgium : Leuven University Press, 1998). Mendras , Maria, "Reflections on the CIS: Myhts and Realities of a Five­ Year-Old Community", European Construction and CIS Integration, Report of the Seminar at the Robert Schuman Center in Florence, 15-16 May 1997. Nausabayeva, Asem , "Yeltsin'den Sonra Putin'le Yeni Rusya", Stratejik Analiz, cilt:1 , sayı:1, Mayıs 2000. Laçiner, Sedat, "Hazar Enerji Kaynakları ve Enerji -Siyaset ilişkisi", Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies vol:1 no:1, 2006,Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu USAK http://www.usak.org.tr/dosyalar/dergi/vRPhzlqgAaUzEbsqIgyiYdXFvT60sp.pdf Ogan, Sinan ,"Sovyetler Birliği'nin Mirası Dağılıyor...", Uluslararası İlişkil­er ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TURKSAM, http://www.turksam.org/tr/a697.html Onay, Yaşar, Rus Stratejisinin Mimarları, (İstanbul : İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, Ocak 2008). Olcott, B.Martha, "Russia's Place in the CIS", Current History, vol:92, no:576, 0ctober, 1993. Pechota, V. "The Commonwealth of Independent States: A Legal Profile", Parker Scholl Journal of East European Law, vol:2, no:4-5, 1995. Purtaş, Fırat, Rusya Federasyonu Ekseninde Bağımsız Devletler Topluluğu, Ankara: Platin Yayınları, 2005 . Primakov, Yevgeniy, " Kapalı Kutu" Rusya Üst Düzey Siyaset Koridorlarında Bir Yaşam, Nuri Eyüpoğlu (çev) Ayşe Edirne (der), Ring Reklamcılık A.Ş., Ekim 2002. Shashenkov, Maxim, "Russian Peacekeeping in the Near Abroad", Survival, vol :36, no:3, Autumn 1994. Şen, Gürkan , "Şanghay Beşlisi ", Stratejik Analiz, cilt:1, sayı: 1 , Mayıs 2000 . Ulusoy, Belkıs & Okan Yeşilot, "Avrasya Coğrafyasında Rusya-ABD Nüfuz Mücadelesi", Turuncu Devrimler SOROS 'un Yeni Dünya Düzeni: İkinci El Demokrasi ve Neconlar, Sinan Ogan(der), (İstanbul : Birharf Yayınları, 2006). Voskressenski , Alfred , Russia, China, USA, Redefining the Triangle, ( New York: Nova Science Publishers, 1996). Yalçınkaya, Alaeddin, Türk Cumhuriyetleri ve Petrol Boru Hatları, (İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 1998). Yeşilot, Okan, Ateş Çemberinde Azerbaycan, (İstanbul: Yeditepe Yayınları, 2010).
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Emel Poyraz

Yayımlanma Tarihi 12 Aralık 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Sayı: 21

Kaynak Göster

APA Poyraz, E. (2012). AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi(21), 1-27.
AMA Poyraz E. AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi. Aralık 2012;(21):1-27.
Chicago Poyraz, Emel. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR”. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 21 (Aralık 2012): 1-27.
EndNote Poyraz E (01 Aralık 2012) AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 21 1–27.
IEEE E. Poyraz, “AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR”, Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 21, ss. 1–27, Aralık 2012.
ISNAD Poyraz, Emel. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR”. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 21 (Aralık 2012), 1-27.
JAMA Poyraz E. AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2012;:1–27.
MLA Poyraz, Emel. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR”. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 21, 2012, ss. 1-27.
Vancouver Poyraz E. AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND RUSSIA ON EURASIAN PROJECT JUST AFTER THE COLD WAR. Güneydoğu Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2012(21):1-27.