BibTex RIS Cite

KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER

Year 2008, Volume: 66 Issue: 1, 3 - 22, 08.10.2010

Hacer Adaoğlu

References

  • Adaoğlu, Soykan Hacer, Direct Effect and Supremacy of EC Law: Possible Effects on Turkish Constitutional System, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eastern Mediterranean University, Institute of Research and Graduate Studies, 1998.
  • Aknes, Age, “The United Nations and Intra-State Conflicts”, Subduing Sovereignty, ed., Marianne Heidberg, London, Printer Publishers, 1994.
  • Annan, Kofi, We the Peoples: The Role of United Nations in the 21. Century, New York, United Nations, 2001.
  • Ansell, Christopher - Weber, Steven, “Organizing International Politics: Sovereignty and Open Systems”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1999, s. 73-93.
  • Ayyob, Muhammed, “Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2002, s. 81-102.
  • Belge, Murat, “AB ve Globalleşme Sürecinde Egemenliğin Dönüşümü ve Ulusal Egemenliğin Geleceği”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 37-44.
  • Biersteker, Thomas - Weber, Cynthia, “The Social Construction of State Sovereignty”, State Sovereignty as Social Construct, ed., T. Biersteker - C. Weber, England, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Camilleri, J.A. - Falk, Jim, The End of Sovereignty, England, Edwar Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1994.
  • Corca, Ken, “Environmental Protection, International Norms and State Sovereignty”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Balti- more, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Corten, Oliver, “Humanitarian Intervention: A Contraversial Right”, UNESCO Courier, July/August, 1999, s.57-59.
  • Craig, Paul - De Burca, Grainne, EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • Crawford, James, “Negotiating Global Security Threats in a World of Nation State: Issues and Problems of Sovereignty”, American Behovioral Scientist, Vol. 38, No. 6, May 1995, s.867-889.
  • Davutoğlu, Ahmet, “Küreselleşme ve AB-Türkiye İlişkileri Çerçevesinde Ulusal Egemenliğin Geleceği”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 46-57.
  • Donnelly, Jack, “State Sovereignty and International Intervention: The Case of Human Rights”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Dyer, Hugh, “The Environment in International Law”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 3,No. 1, April 2001, s. 105-114.
  • Eroğul, Cem, “Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Ko- runmasına ve Anayasa Yargısına Etkileri”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 196-213.
  • Ginsberg, Benjamin, The Captive Public, New York, Basic Books Publishers, 1986.
  • Göztepe, Ece, Avrupa Birliği‟nin Siyasal Bütünleşmesi ve Egemenlik Yetkisinin Paylaşılması Sorunu, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2008.
  • Gündüz, Aslan, “Eroding Concept of National Sovereignty: The Turkish Example”, Marmara Journal of European Studies, Vol.1, No.1-2, 1991, s.99-154.
  • Hakyemez, Yusuf Şevki, Mutlak Monarşilerden Günümüze Egemenlik Kavramı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2004.
  • Howell, Llewellyn, “The Age of Sovereignty Has Come to an End”, USA Today (Magazine), Vol. 127, No. 2640, September, 1998, s.23-25.
  • Huston, James, “Democracy by Scripture versus Democracy by Process”, Civil War History, Vol. 43, No. 3, September 1997, s.189-201.
  • Jackson, Robert, “Introduction: Sovereignty at the Millenium”, Political Studies, Vol. XLVII, 1999, s. 423-430.
  • Kapani, Münci, Kamu Hürriyetleri, Ankara, Yetkin Yayınları, 1993.
  • Kapani, Münci, Politika Bilimine Giriş, İstanbul, Bilgi Yayınevi, 1992.
  • Khan, Ali, The Extinction of Nation State, Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  • Kitfield, James, “Not-So Sacred Borders, (National Sovereignty and Kosovo Crisis)”, National Journal, Nov.1999, s.3386-3390.
  • Koçak, Mustafa, Batı‟da ve Türkiye‟de Egemenlik Anlayışının Değişimi Devlet ve Egemenlik, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2006.
  • Lake, David, “Delegating Divisible Sovereignty: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield”, Review of International Organizations, Vol. 2, 2007, s. 219-237.
  • Louis, Jean Victor, The Community Legal Order, Brussels, The European Perspectives Series, 1995.
  • Madrid, Miguel de la, “National Sovereignty and Globalization”, Houston Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 3, Spring 1997, s.553-563.
  • Makinda, Samuel, “The United Nations and State Sovereignty: Mechanisms for Managing International Security”, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol.33, No.1, March 1999, s.101-116.
  • Martinez, M. Magdelena, National Sovereignty and International Organizations, Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  • Melkas, Eriika, “Sovereignty and Equity within the Framework of the Climate Regime”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2002, s. 115-128.
  • Nolan, E. Janne, “Sovereignty and Collective Intervention: Controlling Weapons of Mass Destruction”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Oran, Baskın, “Ulusal Egemenlik Kavramının Dönüşümü, Azınlıklar ve Türkiye”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 61-93.
  • Pierson, Christopher, The Modern State, London, Routledge, 1996.
  • Rodeo, Carlton Clymer, et.al., Introduction to Political Science, Singapore, McGraw Hill, 1983.
  • Rosas, Alan, “State Sovereignty and Human Rights: Towards a Global Constitutional Project”, Political Studies, Vol. XLIII, 1995, s. 61-78.
  • Schattschneider, E.E, The Semisovereign People, San Francisco, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 1983.
  • Schwars, Rolf – Jütersonke, Oliver, “Divisible Sovereignty and the Reconstruction of Iraq”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4-5, 2005, s. 649-665. Stokes, Bruce, “Economic Interests: It‟s All About Power”, National Journal, Vol. 20, 1999, s.3392-3395.
  • Strange, Susan, “The Defective State”, Daedalus, Vol. 124, No. 2, Spring 1995, s.55-75.
  • Tarhanlı, Turgut, “Kuvvet Kullanma, Meşruiyet ve Hukuk”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 133-156.
  • Teziç, Erdoğan, Anayasa Hukuku, İstanbul, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 1986.
  • Turhan, Mehmet, “Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Korunmasına Etkileri ve Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 215-248.
  • Uygun, Oktay, “Küreselleşme ve Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Sosyal Haklara Etkisi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 250-284.
  • Wallace, William, “The Sharing of Sovereignty: the European Paradox”, Political Studies, Vol. XLII, 1999, s. 503-521.
  • Wang, Guiguo, “The Impact of Globalization on State Sovereignty”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, 2004, s. 473-483.

Year 2008, Volume: 66 Issue: 1, 3 - 22, 08.10.2010

Hacer Adaoğlu

References

  • Adaoğlu, Soykan Hacer, Direct Effect and Supremacy of EC Law: Possible Effects on Turkish Constitutional System, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eastern Mediterranean University, Institute of Research and Graduate Studies, 1998.
  • Aknes, Age, “The United Nations and Intra-State Conflicts”, Subduing Sovereignty, ed., Marianne Heidberg, London, Printer Publishers, 1994.
  • Annan, Kofi, We the Peoples: The Role of United Nations in the 21. Century, New York, United Nations, 2001.
  • Ansell, Christopher - Weber, Steven, “Organizing International Politics: Sovereignty and Open Systems”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1999, s. 73-93.
  • Ayyob, Muhammed, “Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2002, s. 81-102.
  • Belge, Murat, “AB ve Globalleşme Sürecinde Egemenliğin Dönüşümü ve Ulusal Egemenliğin Geleceği”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 37-44.
  • Biersteker, Thomas - Weber, Cynthia, “The Social Construction of State Sovereignty”, State Sovereignty as Social Construct, ed., T. Biersteker - C. Weber, England, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Camilleri, J.A. - Falk, Jim, The End of Sovereignty, England, Edwar Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1994.
  • Corca, Ken, “Environmental Protection, International Norms and State Sovereignty”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Balti- more, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Corten, Oliver, “Humanitarian Intervention: A Contraversial Right”, UNESCO Courier, July/August, 1999, s.57-59.
  • Craig, Paul - De Burca, Grainne, EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • Crawford, James, “Negotiating Global Security Threats in a World of Nation State: Issues and Problems of Sovereignty”, American Behovioral Scientist, Vol. 38, No. 6, May 1995, s.867-889.
  • Davutoğlu, Ahmet, “Küreselleşme ve AB-Türkiye İlişkileri Çerçevesinde Ulusal Egemenliğin Geleceği”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 46-57.
  • Donnelly, Jack, “State Sovereignty and International Intervention: The Case of Human Rights”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Dyer, Hugh, “The Environment in International Law”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 3,No. 1, April 2001, s. 105-114.
  • Eroğul, Cem, “Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Ko- runmasına ve Anayasa Yargısına Etkileri”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 196-213.
  • Ginsberg, Benjamin, The Captive Public, New York, Basic Books Publishers, 1986.
  • Göztepe, Ece, Avrupa Birliği‟nin Siyasal Bütünleşmesi ve Egemenlik Yetkisinin Paylaşılması Sorunu, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2008.
  • Gündüz, Aslan, “Eroding Concept of National Sovereignty: The Turkish Example”, Marmara Journal of European Studies, Vol.1, No.1-2, 1991, s.99-154.
  • Hakyemez, Yusuf Şevki, Mutlak Monarşilerden Günümüze Egemenlik Kavramı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2004.
  • Howell, Llewellyn, “The Age of Sovereignty Has Come to an End”, USA Today (Magazine), Vol. 127, No. 2640, September, 1998, s.23-25.
  • Huston, James, “Democracy by Scripture versus Democracy by Process”, Civil War History, Vol. 43, No. 3, September 1997, s.189-201.
  • Jackson, Robert, “Introduction: Sovereignty at the Millenium”, Political Studies, Vol. XLVII, 1999, s. 423-430.
  • Kapani, Münci, Kamu Hürriyetleri, Ankara, Yetkin Yayınları, 1993.
  • Kapani, Münci, Politika Bilimine Giriş, İstanbul, Bilgi Yayınevi, 1992.
  • Khan, Ali, The Extinction of Nation State, Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  • Kitfield, James, “Not-So Sacred Borders, (National Sovereignty and Kosovo Crisis)”, National Journal, Nov.1999, s.3386-3390.
  • Koçak, Mustafa, Batı‟da ve Türkiye‟de Egemenlik Anlayışının Değişimi Devlet ve Egemenlik, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2006.
  • Lake, David, “Delegating Divisible Sovereignty: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield”, Review of International Organizations, Vol. 2, 2007, s. 219-237.
  • Louis, Jean Victor, The Community Legal Order, Brussels, The European Perspectives Series, 1995.
  • Madrid, Miguel de la, “National Sovereignty and Globalization”, Houston Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 3, Spring 1997, s.553-563.
  • Makinda, Samuel, “The United Nations and State Sovereignty: Mechanisms for Managing International Security”, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol.33, No.1, March 1999, s.101-116.
  • Martinez, M. Magdelena, National Sovereignty and International Organizations, Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  • Melkas, Eriika, “Sovereignty and Equity within the Framework of the Climate Regime”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2002, s. 115-128.
  • Nolan, E. Janne, “Sovereignty and Collective Intervention: Controlling Weapons of Mass Destruction”, Beyond Westphalia, ed., Gene M. Lyons - M. Mastanduno, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Oran, Baskın, “Ulusal Egemenlik Kavramının Dönüşümü, Azınlıklar ve Türkiye”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 61-93.
  • Pierson, Christopher, The Modern State, London, Routledge, 1996.
  • Rodeo, Carlton Clymer, et.al., Introduction to Political Science, Singapore, McGraw Hill, 1983.
  • Rosas, Alan, “State Sovereignty and Human Rights: Towards a Global Constitutional Project”, Political Studies, Vol. XLIII, 1995, s. 61-78.
  • Schattschneider, E.E, The Semisovereign People, San Francisco, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 1983.
  • Schwars, Rolf – Jütersonke, Oliver, “Divisible Sovereignty and the Reconstruction of Iraq”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4-5, 2005, s. 649-665. Stokes, Bruce, “Economic Interests: It‟s All About Power”, National Journal, Vol. 20, 1999, s.3392-3395.
  • Strange, Susan, “The Defective State”, Daedalus, Vol. 124, No. 2, Spring 1995, s.55-75.
  • Tarhanlı, Turgut, “Kuvvet Kullanma, Meşruiyet ve Hukuk”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 133-156.
  • Teziç, Erdoğan, Anayasa Hukuku, İstanbul, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 1986.
  • Turhan, Mehmet, “Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Korunmasına Etkileri ve Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 215-248.
  • Uygun, Oktay, “Küreselleşme ve Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Sosyal Haklara Etkisi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Cilt: 20, 2003, s. 250-284.
  • Wallace, William, “The Sharing of Sovereignty: the European Paradox”, Political Studies, Vol. XLII, 1999, s. 503-521.
  • Wang, Guiguo, “The Impact of Globalization on State Sovereignty”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, 2004, s. 473-483.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Public Law
Authors

Hacer Adaoğlu

Publication Date October 8, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 66 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Adaoğlu, H. (2010). KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 66(1), 3-22.
AMA Adaoğlu H. KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. October 2010;66(1):3-22.
Chicago Adaoğlu, Hacer. “KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 66, no. 1 (October 2010): 3-22.
EndNote Adaoğlu H (October 1, 2010) KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 66 1 3–22.
IEEE H. Adaoğlu, “KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER”, Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2010.
ISNAD Adaoğlu, Hacer. “KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 66/1 (October 2010), 3-22.
JAMA Adaoğlu H. KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2010;66:3–22.
MLA Adaoğlu, Hacer. “KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 66, no. 1, 2010, pp. 3-22.
Vancouver Adaoğlu H. KÜRESELLEŞME VE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ DEĞİŞMESİNE YOL AÇAN ETMENLER. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2010;66(1):3-22.