Avrupa Birliği Çoğul Medeniyet Formlarının Birarada Yaşaması ve Sosyal Politika/Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Uygulamaları İçin Bölgesel Siyasi Bir Laboratuvarı Teşkil Edebilir Mi?

Abstract

Avrupa Bütünleşmesi hareketini incelerken bu makale temelde iki ana soruya cevap aramaktadır. Daha ne kadar süreyle kollektif kimlikleri (milli, kültürel, dini veya medeniyet bazlı) Uluslararası İlişkilerin ana analiz birimi olarak kabul etmek zorundayız? Ayrıca, ulus/medeniyet/kültür/din bazlı olmanın ötesindeki meşruiyet formları tamamen bir hayal olarak mı kalacaktır? Bugün en gelişmiş bölgesel siyasi ve ekonomik bütünleşme hareketi durumundaki Avrupa Birliği'nin bu çerçevedeki başarı ve başarısızlıklarının analizi, bu tür yönetişim modellerinin (çoğul medeniyet formlarını içselleştiren ve dağıtımcı adaleti sağlayabilen) ortaya çıkma olasılıkları hakkında önemli ipuçları verecektir. Bu çerçevede, bu makale, Avrupa Birliği'nin, söz konusu çoğul medeniyet formlarının oluşabilmesi ve sosyal politikalarla desteklenmiş sürdürülebilir kalkınma modelleri gelişmesi için bir bölgesel siyasi deney alanı olarak ele alınabileceğini öne sürecek ve bu bağlamda söz konusu yapıyı inceleyecektir.

Keywords

• Bölgesel Entegrasyon, Avrupa Birliği, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Sosyal Politikalar, Çoğul Medeniyet Formları

References

1. See: Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, Terence, The Invention of the Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
2. Rorty, Richard, „Globalisation, the Politics of Identity and Social Hope‟ in Rorty, Richard (Ed.), Philosophy and Social Hope, London: Penguin, 1999.
3. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Du Contrat Social, Ou Principes du Droit Politique, 1762.
4. Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Complete Works, Bonn, 1845. Herder, Johann Gottfried, Works, Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1913.
5. See: Renan, Joseph Ernest, Discours de la Sorbonne: Qu’este qu’un Nation?, 1870.
6. Cederman, Lars (Ed.), Constructing Europe’s Identity, Lynne Rienner: London, 2001. p. 35
7. Scharpf, Fritz, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999
8. Polanyi, Karl, Great Transformation, New York: Rinehart, 1944. Bauman, Zygmunt, Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. p. 33

9. Habermas, Jurgen, The Post-National Constellation: Political Essays, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001. p. 109
10. Bauman, Zygmunt, Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. p. 81
11. Habermas, Jurgen, The Post-National Constellation: Political Essays, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001. p. 102
12. Bauman, Zygmunt, Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. p. 137
13. Cederman, Lars (Ed.), Constructing Europe’s Identity, Lynne Rienner: London, 2001. pp. 52-53
14. Kostakopoulou, Theodora, Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union, Manchester University Press: Manchester, 2001. p. 16
15. Gellner, Ernst, Nations and Nationalism, New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.
16. See: Smith, Anthony D., The Antiquity of Nations, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
17. Smith, Anthony D. „National Identity and the Idea of European Unity”, International Affairs, 68, 1992. pp. 55-76
18. Huntington, Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998.
19. For various examples of these see: Apap, Joanna (Ed.), Justice and Home Affairs in the EU: Liberty and Security Issues after Enlargement, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004, Carmin, Joann and Vandaveer, Stacy, EU Enlargement And The Environment: Institutional Change And Environmental Policy In Central And Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, 2004, Usher, John and Andenas, Mads, The Treaty of Nice and Beyond: Enlargement and Constitutional Reform, Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2003, Munch, Wolfgang, Effects of EU Enlargement to the Central European Countries on Agricultural Markets, Lang: Frankfurt, 2003.
20. Generally the Lisbon Strategy of 2000 is considered as such a neo-liberal attempt in this direction. Scharpf, Fritz, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
21. Nicolaidis, Kalypso, The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the US and the European Union, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
22. Verhofstadt, Guy, The United States of Europe, London: Federal Trust for Education and Research, 2006.
23. Rifkin, Jeremy, The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream, New York: Penguin, 2004.
24. Kluegel, James R. and Smith, Eliot R., Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views about What Is and Ought to Be, New York: Aldine-deGrueter, 1986. p.101
25. See: Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, London: Academic Press, 1974, Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy 1600-1750, London: Academic Press, 1980, Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System III, London: Academic Press, 1988.
26. Silver, J. Beverly, Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
27. See also: Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers, London: Random House Value Publishing, 1990.
28. Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Decline of American Power: The US in a Chaotic World, New York: New Press, 2003. p. 308
29. Esping-Andersen, Gosta, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, London: Polity Press, 1990. p. 3
30. See: Soskice, David, Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
31. Kleinman, Mark, A European Welfare State?, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002. p. 19
32. Flora, A. and Alber, J., „Modernization, Democratization and the Development of Welfare States in Western Europe‟ in Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A. J. (Eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe, London: Transaction, 1990.
33. Cini, Michelle (Ed.), European Union Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. p.273.
34. See: Soskice, David, Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
35. Remacle, E., „Teaching European Politics, Policies and Polity in the New Century: Lessons From the Experience of the Institut d‟Etudes Européennees‟ in Sobotka, K. (Ed.), Political Science and the EU-Related Studies, Lodz: European Institute, 2000. pp. 129-141.
36. Warleigh, Alex, Democracy in the European Union, London: Sage, 2003. pp. 1-28
37. Schmidt, Vivien, The European Union: Democratic Legitimacy in a Regional State, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies Press, Volume 91, 2003. p. 13.
38. See: Imig, D. and Tarrow, S. (Eds.), Contentious Europeans, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001, Greenwood, J., Interest Representation in the EU, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
39. Mair, Peter, „The Limited Impact of Europe on National Party Systems‟ in Goetz, K., and Hix, S. (Eds.), Europeanised Politics?, London: Frank Cass, 2001. pp. 27-51
40. Habermas, Jurgen, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000. pp. 128-191
41. Habermas, Jurgen, „Beyond the Nation-State?‟in Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and Fossum, John Erik (Eds.), Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation?, London: Routledge, 2000. p. 36 Ibid.p. 37
42. See: Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation, New York: Beacon Press, 2001.
43. Ibid. p. 53
44. Ibid. p. 176
45. Hirst, Paul and Thompson, Grahame, Globalisation in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. p. 153 Ibid. p. 169
46. Bauman, Zygmunt, Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. p. 18