Reel Kesim Güven Endeksi ile İMKB 100 Endeksi arasındaki dinamik nedensellik ilişkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada İMKB 100 endeks getirisi ile Reel Kesim Güven Endeksi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi Cheung ve Ng [1] tarafından geliştirilen iki aşamalı yöntem ile araştırılmıştır. İlk aşamada İMKB 100 endeks getirisi ve güven endeksi EGARCH model ile tahmin edilmiştir. İkinci aşamada EGARCH modelden elde edilen standardize hatalar ve kareleri kullanılarak İMKB 100 endeks getirisi ve güven endeksi için ortalamada ve varyansta nedensellik testi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, İMKB 100 endeksi getirisi ile güven endeksi arasında geri bildirim etkisi mevcuttur ve eş zamanlı olarak birbirlerini etkilemektedirler.

Keywords

• Güven Endeksi,İMKB 100,EGARCH

The Dynamic Causality Relation between Real Sector Confidence Index and ISE 100 Index

Abstract

In this study, the causality relation between ISE 100 index return and Real Sector Confidence Index are analyzed with a two-stage method developed by Cheung and Ng [1]. ISE 100 index return and confidence index are estimated with EGARCH model in the first stage. In the second stage, the standardized residuals and squares obtained from the EGARCH model are used for causality test in the mean and variance for the ISE 100 index return and confidence index. The results of the analysis show that there is a feedback effect between ISE 100 index return and confidence index and they simultaneously affect each other.

Keywords

• Confidence Index,ISE 100,EGARCH

References

1. Y.W. Cheung and L.K. Ng, A Causality-in-Variance Test and Its Applications to Financial Market Prices. Journal of Econometrics. 72, 33–48 (1996).
2. W.J. Jansen and N.J. Nahuis, The Stock Market and Consumer Confidence: European Evidence. Economics Letters. 79, 89-98 (2003).
3. D.R. Eppright, N.M. Arguea, and W.L. Huth, Aggregate Consumer Expectation Indexes as Indicator of Future Consumer Expenditures. Journal of Economic Psychology.19, 215-235 (1998).
4. M.W. Otoo, Consumer Sentiment and the Stock Market. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/1999/199960/ 199960pap.pdf, (1999) (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2007).
5. L.K. Fisher and M. Statman, Consumer Confidence and Stock Returns. Santa Clara University Department of Finance. Working Paper. No. 02-02 (2002). [6] A. Utaka, Confidence and Real Economy-The Japanese Case. Applied Economics.35, 337-342 (2003).
6. G.W. Brown and M.T. Cliff, Investor Sentiment and the Near-Term Stock Market. Journal of Empirical Finance. 11, 1-27 (2004).
7. P.K. Christ and D.S. Bremmer, The Relationship between Consumer Sentiment and Stock Prices. 78. Annual Conference of the Western Economics Association International.Denver. Colorado (2003).
8. B.H. Lopez and A. Durre, The Determinants of Consumer Confidence: The Case of United States and Belgium. http://www.core.ucl.ac.be/services/psfiles/dp03/dp200353.pdf, (2003). (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2007).

9. L. Eduardo and L. Brito, Is There Consumer Confidence Index a Sound Predictor of the Private Demand in the United States? Estudios De Economia Aplicada. 22, 2-15(2004).
10. A. Bandopadhyaya and A.L. Jones, Measuring Investor Sentiment in Equity Market.Journal of Asset Management. 7, 208–215 (2006).
11. F.L. Dunn and I.A. Mirzaie, Turns In Consumer Confidence: An Information Advantage Linked to Manufacturing. Oxford University Press. 44, 343-351 (2006).
12. A. Kwan and J. Cotsomitis, Does Consumer Confidence Matter for Household Spending? Evidence from Japan. http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/eco/staff/cckwan/research Paper/KC_CCI_Japan_OBES-.pdf, (2007). (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2007).
13. G. Kling and L. Gao, Chinese Institutional Investors’ Sentiment. International Financial Markets, Institutions&Money. 18, 374-387 (2008).
14. S. Canbaş ve S.Y. Kandır, Yatırımcı Duyarlılığının İMKB Sektör Gelirleri Üzerindeki Etkisi. http://www.finansbilim.com/ufs2006/Makaleler/YATIRIMCIDUYARLILIGININ.pdf, (2006). (Erişim Tarihi: 11.11.2008).
15. S.Y. Kandır, Tüketici Güveni ve Hisse Senedi Getirileri İlişkisi: İMKB Mali Sektör Şirketleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 15 (2), 217-230 (2006).
16. T. Korkmaz ve E.İ. Çevik, Güven Endeksi ve Yatırımcıların Sezgileri: Türkiye Örneği.11. Ulusal Finans Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Zonguldak. 389-410 (2007).
17. S. Olgaç ve F. Temizel, Yatrımcı Duyarlılığı Hisse Senedi Getirileri İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Tisk Akademi. 3, 224-239 (2008).
18. Tütkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası, www.tcmb.gov.tr. (Erişim Tarihi: 03.11.2008).
19. R.F. Engle, Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inflation. Econometrica. 50, 987–1008 (1982).
20. T. Bollerslev, Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31, 307-327 (1986).
21. M. Verbeek, Guide to Modern Econometrics. John Wiley&Sons, England (2000).
22. L.R. Glosten, R. Jaganathan, and D. Runkle, On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Normal Excess Return on Stocks. Journal of Finance. 48,1779-1801 (1993).
23. D.B. Nelson, Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica. 59, 347–370 (1991).
24. W. Enders, Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley&Sons Inc., USA, (2004).
25. D.A. Dickey and W.A. Fuller, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74, 427-431(1979).
26. P.C. Phillips and P. Perron, Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika. 75, 335-46 (1988).