Case Report

Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting

Volume: 46 Number: 2 November 1, 2017
EN

Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting

Abstract

Neural networks are one of the widely-used time series forecasting methods in time series applications. Among different neural network architectures and learning algorithms, the most popular choice is the feedforward Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). However, it suffers from some drawbacks such as getting trapped in local minima, human intervention during the stage of training, and limitations in architecture design. The aims of this study were twofold. The first was to employ NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies (NEAT), which has many successful applications in numerous fields. In this paper, we applied it to time series forecasting for the first time and compared its performance with that of the MLP. The second aim was to analyse the performance resulting from the pairwise combination of these methods. In general, the results suggested that the forecasts from the NEAT algorithm were more accurate than those of the MLP. The results also showed that pairwise combined forecasts in general were better than single forecasts. The best forecasts of all were obtained by pairwise combination of MLP and NEAT.

Keywords

References

  1. Angeline, P. J., Saunders, G. M., & Pollack, J. B. (1994). An evolutionary algorithm that constructs recurrent neural networks. IEEE transactions on Neural Networks, 5(1), 54-65.
  2. Aras, S., & Kocakoç, İ. D. (2016). A new model selection strategy in time series forecasting with artificial neural networks: IHTS. Neurocomputing, 174, 974-987.
  3. Armstrong, J. S. (1989). Combining forecasts: The end of the beginning or the beginning of the end? International Journal of Forecasting, 5(4), 585-588.
  4. Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.). (2001). “Combining forecasts”, Chapter 13 in Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media.
  5. Armstrong, J. S., & Fildes, R. (1995). Correspondence on the selection of error measures for comparisons among forecasting methods. Journal of Forecasting, 14(1), 67-71.
  6. Bates, J. M., & Granger, C. W. (1969). The combination of forecasts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 20(4), 451-468.
  7. Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5(4), 559-583.
  8. Cybenko, G. (1989). Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of control, signals and systems, 2(4), 303-314.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Case Report

Authors

Anh Nguyen This is me

Allan White This is me

Shan He This is me

Publication Date

November 1, 2017

Submission Date

August 18, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 46 Number: 2

APA
Aras, S., Nguyen, A., White, A., & He, S. (2017). Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(2), 147-160. https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW
AMA
1.Aras S, Nguyen A, White A, He S. Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;46(2):147-160. https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW
Chicago
Aras, Serkan, Anh Nguyen, Allan White, and Shan He. 2017. “Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 46 (2): 147-60. https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW.
EndNote
Aras S, Nguyen A, White A, He S (November 1, 2017) Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 46 2 147–160.
IEEE
[1]S. Aras, A. Nguyen, A. White, and S. He, “Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 147–160, Nov. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW
ISNAD
Aras, Serkan - Nguyen, Anh - White, Allan - He, Shan. “Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 46/2 (November 1, 2017): 147-160. https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW.
JAMA
1.Aras S, Nguyen A, White A, He S. Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;46:147–160.
MLA
Aras, Serkan, et al. “Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 46, no. 2, Nov. 2017, pp. 147-60, https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW.
Vancouver
1.Serkan Aras, Anh Nguyen, Allan White, Shan He. Comparing and Combining MLP and NEAT for Time Series Forecasting. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2017 Nov. 1;46(2):147-60. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA92DX92YW