Research Article

Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br.

Volume: 54 Number: 2 August 26, 2024
EN

Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Traditional indigenous system of medicine employed many Chenopodium species to treat a wide range of ailments. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant capacity of the species Chenopodium album and Chenopodium pumilio. Methods: Phenolics and flavonoid content were quantified using spectrophotometric techniques. The antioxidant activity of Chenopodium extracts was evaluated by assaying ferric reducing antioxidant power, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity, phosphomolybdenum reducing power, ferrous ion chelating activity, hydrogen peroxide radical scav enging activity, hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, deoxyribose degradation activity, and β-carotene bleaching activity. Results: In C. album and C. pumilio, total phenolic concentration was 17.5–23.8 and 13.3–25.3 mg tannic acid equivalent/g, respectively, and flavonoid content was 0.21–0.85 mg and 0.10–0.89 mg quercetin equivalent/g, respectively. Thus, C. pumilio had a higher content of phenolics and flavonoids than C. album. However, comparison of extracts in different solvents showed that ethanolic and aqueous extracts exhibited higher phenolics and flavonoid content than other solvent systems. The antioxidant capability of the species, determined by antioxidant assays, varied with the species evaluated and the solvents used for extraction. Remarkably, the correlation coefficient of different antioxidant assays with the phenolics and flavonoid content in both species showed discrepancy. Conclusion: Ethanolic and aqueous extracts of the Chenopodium species studied had higher phenolics, flavonoids, and free radical scavenging activity than methanolic and acetonic extracts. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts of the studied species provide a potential source of antioxidants for drug formulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Adedapo A., Jimoh F., Afolayan A. (2011). Comparison of the nutritive value and biological activities of the acetone, methanol and water extracts of the leaves of Biden spilosa and Chenopodium album. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica Drug Research, 68, 83-92. google scholar
  2. Al-Laith, A.A., Alkhuzai, J., & Freije, A. (2019). Assessment of antioxidant activities of three wild medicinal plants from Bahrain. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12 (8), 2365-2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.03.004. google scholar
  3. Alnsour, L., Issa, R., Awwad, S., Albals, D., & Al-Momani, I. (2022). Quantification of total phenols and antioxidants in cof-fee samples of different origins and evaluation of the effect of degree of roasting on their levels. Molecules, 28, 27(5):1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051591. google scholar
  4. Alvarez-Jubete, L., Wijngaard, H., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2010). Polyphenol composition and in vitro antioxidant ac-tivity of amaranth, quinoa buckwheat and wheat as affected by sprouting and baking. Food Chemistry, 119 (2), 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.032. google scholar
  5. Aquino, R., Morelli, S., Lauro, M. R., Abdo, S., Saija, A., & Tomaino, A. (2001). Phenolic constituents and antioxidant activity of an ex-tract of Anthurium versicolor leaves. Journal of Natural Products, 64(8), 1019-23. https://doi.org/10.1021/np0101245. google scholar
  6. Aryal, S., Baniya, M. K., Danekhu, K., Kunwar, P., Gurung, R., & Koirala, N. (2019). Total phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant potential of wild vegetables from western Nepal. Plants (Basel), 8(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040096. google scholar
  7. Basniwal, P. K., Suthar, M., Rathore, G. S., Gupta, R., Kumar, V., Pareek, A., & Jain D. (2009). In-vitro antioxidant activity of hot aqueous extract of Helicteres isora Linn. fruits. Natural Product Radiance, 8, 483-7. google scholar
  8. Cai. Y. Z., Luo, Q., Sun, M., & Corke, H. (2004). Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Science, 74, 2157-2184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047. google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pharmaceutical Botany

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 26, 2024

Submission Date

June 27, 2023

Acceptance Date

March 21, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 54 Number: 2

APA
Kolar, F. R., Kambhar, S. V., Kamble, V. S., & Daphedar, A. B. (2024). Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 54(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743
AMA
1.Kolar FR, Kambhar SV, Kamble VS, Daphedar AB. Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. iujp. 2024;54(2):165-174. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743
Chicago
Kolar, Firdose R., Sidanand V. Kambhar, Vaishali S. Kamble, and Azharuddin B. Daphedar. 2024. “Comparative Examination of Phenolic Content, Flavonoid Content, and Antioxidant Efficacy of Chenopodium Album L. And Chenopodium Pumilio R. Br”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54 (2): 165-74. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743.
EndNote
Kolar FR, Kambhar SV, Kamble VS, Daphedar AB (August 1, 2024) Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54 2 165–174.
IEEE
[1]F. R. Kolar, S. V. Kambhar, V. S. Kamble, and A. B. Daphedar, “Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br”., iujp, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 165–174, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743.
ISNAD
Kolar, Firdose R. - Kambhar, Sidanand V. - Kamble, Vaishali S. - Daphedar, Azharuddin B. “Comparative Examination of Phenolic Content, Flavonoid Content, and Antioxidant Efficacy of Chenopodium Album L. And Chenopodium Pumilio R. Br”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54/2 (August 1, 2024): 165-174. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743.
JAMA
1.Kolar FR, Kambhar SV, Kamble VS, Daphedar AB. Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. iujp. 2024;54:165–174.
MLA
Kolar, Firdose R., et al. “Comparative Examination of Phenolic Content, Flavonoid Content, and Antioxidant Efficacy of Chenopodium Album L. And Chenopodium Pumilio R. Br”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 54, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 165-74, doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743.
Vancouver
1.Firdose R. Kolar, Sidanand V. Kambhar, Vaishali S. Kamble, Azharuddin B. Daphedar. Comparative examination of phenolic content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant efficacy of Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. iujp. 2024 Aug. 1;54(2):165-74. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1313743