Research Article

Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles

Volume: 54 Number: 3 December 30, 2024
EN

Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles

Abstract

Background and Aims: In recent years, metal nanoparticles have been extensively synthesized for a variety of applications and have been used in large-scale research in various fields, such as chemistry, physics, life science, material science, medical science, and engineering, depending on their size and shape adjustment properties. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of silver nanoparticles synthesized using two different methods on DNA damage and cell viability in human lymphocyte cultures. Methods: We introduced a green and simple method for the synthesis of AgNPs using endemic Onosma papillosa Riedl leaf extract as a reducing agent for the first time. Blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes from four healthy males, non-smokers, and healthy male. In this study, we used comet assay [Genetic Damage Index (GDI) and Damaged Cell Percentage (DCP)] and flow cytometry methods for genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. For comparison, commercially obtained AgNPs synthesized by chemical methods were used, with consideration given to the size of AgNPs synthesized via the green method. Results: Based on the results, it was determined that DNA damage caused by AgNPs synthesized through the green method in human lymphocyte cultures was not statistically significant compared with the negative control. AgNPs obtained by chemical synthesis caused, however, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of DNA damage compared with the negative control (p<0.001). The percentage of necrotic cells was 13.55±3.37 and 25.37±14.53 in cultures obtained by green and chemically synthesized AgNPs, respectively. Conclusion: Essentially, green synthesis can be recommended for use because of its lower toxicity compared with chemical synthesis.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Mersin Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeler Birimi

Project Number

2018-2-TP3-2989

Ethical Statement

Mersin University Ethical Committee approved the experiments described in this study (06.04.2022-2022/241).

Thanks

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Mersin University (Project number: 2018-2-TP3-2989).

References

  1. Alexandridis, P., (2011). Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis, Mor-phology Control, and Stabilization Facilitated by Func-tional Polymers. Chemical Engineering Technology, 34, 15-28.https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000335 google scholar
  2. Arya, A., Mishra, V., & Chundawat, T.S., (2019). Green syn-thesis of silver nanoparticles from green algae (Botryococ-cus braunii) and its catalytic behavior for the synthesis of benzimidazoles. Chemical Data Collections, 20,100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100190 google scholar
  3. Avalos, A., Haza, A.I., Mateo, D., & Morales, P.(2014). Cytotoxic-ity and ROS production of manufactured silver nanoparticles of different sizes in hepatoma and leukemia cells, Journal . Applied Toxicology, 34 (4). 413-423, https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2957. google scholar
  4. Battal, D., Celik, A., Güler, G., Aktaş, A., Yildirimcan, S., Ocakoglu, K., & Çömelekoglu, Ü., (2015). SiO2 Nanoparticule-induced size-dependent genotoxicity-an in vitro study us-ing sister chromatid exchange, micronucleus and comet assay. Drug and Chemical Toxicology, 38(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.3109/01480545.2014.928721 google scholar
  5. Bharathi, D., Vasantharaj, S., & Bhuvaneshwari, V. (2018). Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cordia dichotoma fruit extract and its enhanced antibacterial, anti- biofilm and photo catalytic activity. Materials Research Express, 5(5), 055404. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aac2ef google scholar
  6. Buzea, C., Pacheco, I.I., & Robbie, K., (2007). Nanomaterials & nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2(4), MR17-MR71. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2815690 google scholar
  7. Das, C. A., Kumar, V. G., Dhas, T. S., Karthick, V. Govindaraju, K., Joselin J. M., & Baalamurugan, J., (2020). Antibacterial ac-tivity of silver nanoparticles (biosynthesis): A short review on recent advances. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 27, 101593.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101593 google scholar
  8. Dobrzynska, M.M., Gajowik, A., Radzikowska, J., Lankoff, A., Dusin-ska, M., & Kruszewski, M., (2014). Genotoxicity of silver and ti-tanium dioxide nanoparticles in bone marrow cells of rats in vivo. Toxicology, 315, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.11.012 google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2024

Submission Date

January 31, 2024

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 54 Number: 3

APA
Güler, G., Turunc, E., Binzet, R., Yetkin, D., & Çelik, A. (2024). Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 54(3), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586
AMA
1.Güler G, Turunc E, Binzet R, Yetkin D, Çelik A. Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. iujp. 2024;54(3):435-445. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586
Chicago
Güler, Gizem, Ersan Turunc, Rıza Binzet, Derya Yetkin, and Ayla Çelik. 2024. “Differences in Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Potentials of Green and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54 (3): 435-45. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586.
EndNote
Güler G, Turunc E, Binzet R, Yetkin D, Çelik A (December 1, 2024) Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54 3 435–445.
IEEE
[1]G. Güler, E. Turunc, R. Binzet, D. Yetkin, and A. Çelik, “Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles”, iujp, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 435–445, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586.
ISNAD
Güler, Gizem - Turunc, Ersan - Binzet, Rıza - Yetkin, Derya - Çelik, Ayla. “Differences in Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Potentials of Green and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 54/3 (December 1, 2024): 435-445. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586.
JAMA
1.Güler G, Turunc E, Binzet R, Yetkin D, Çelik A. Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. iujp. 2024;54:435–445.
MLA
Güler, Gizem, et al. “Differences in Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Potentials of Green and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 54, no. 3, Dec. 2024, pp. 435-4, doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Güler, Ersan Turunc, Rıza Binzet, Derya Yetkin, Ayla Çelik. Differences in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity potentials of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. iujp. 2024 Dec. 1;54(3):435-4. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2024.1425586