BibTex RIS Cite

Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 2 - 15, 24.10.2015

Abstract

This study analyses theoretical problems in the study of tourism and reviews some major thoughts and literature as well as tourism as an emerging discipline. Tourism as a scientific discipline still does not haveits own and established academic body that distinguishes it from other sciences. Therefore, tourism as a recent field of research is struggling without being understood in the correct way because its theory of knowledge is not delimited and tries to be reflected from the point of view of its formal components. In this sense, the principal aim of this article is to try to delimit the perspectives and definitions of the main authors that have contributed tothe "tourism theory" in general until now, by focusing on several dimensions such us: positivism, materialism, neo-durkheimism, functionalism and post-modernism.      

References

  • AECIT (1996). Asociación Española de Expertos Científicos en Turismo, Actividad Turística Española en 1994., Castellón: AECIT.
  • Panosso, A. (2005). Filosofia do turismo: Teoria e epistemología, Brasil: Aleph.
  • Álvarez Sousa, A. (1993). Estructura Social y Consumo Turístico: los Viajes de los Españoles: Segmentación, Tendencias y Comparación con los Países Comunitarios, Doctoral Thesis (unpublished), Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
  • ANECA (2004): Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación, Libro Blanco del Título de Grado en Turismo, Madrid.
  • Baudelaire, C. (1982). The painter of modern life charles baudelaire.. A Critical Anthology, 23.
  • Belhassen, Y., & Caton, K. (2009). Advancing understandings: A linguistic approach to tourism epistemology. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(2), 335-352.
  • Bowen, D. (2001). Research on tourist satisfaction and dissatisfaction: Overcoming the limitations of a positivist and quantitative approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7(1), 31-40.
  • Britton, S. (1991). Tourism, capital, and place: towards a critical geography of tourism. Environment and planning: Society and Space, 9(4), 451-478.
  • Burkart, A.J., & Medlik, S. (1974). Tourism: Past present and future. London: Heinemann.
  • Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Gilbert, D., Wanhill, S. (1993).Tourism: Principles and practices. London: Pitman.
  • Darbellay, F., & Stock, M. (2012).Tourism as a complex interdisciplinary research object.Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 441-458.
  • Crick, M. (1998). Representations of international tourism in the social sciences: Sun, sex, sights, savings, and servility. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 307-344.
  • Darbellay, F. & Stock, M. (2012).Tourism as a complex interdisciplinary research object. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 441-458.
  • Echtner, C.M., & Jamal, T.B. (1997). The disciplinary dilemma of tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 868-883.
  • Gilbert, D.C. (1990). Conceptual issues in the meaning of tourism. In C.P. Cooper (Ed.), Progress in tourism, recreation and hospitality management (pp. 4-27), London: Belhaven.
  • Knebel, H. J. (1960). Soziologische Strukturwandlungen im modernen Tourismus. F. Enke.
  • Harvey, D. (1998). La condición de la posmodernidad. Argentina: Ediciones Amorrortu.
  • Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge.
  • Hoivik, T. and Heiberg, T. (1980).Centre-periphery tourism and self-reliance. International Social Science Journal, 3(1), 69-98.
  • Istanbullu, F.I., Cetin, G., Aslan, E.H., Izgi, M.T., &Demiroglu, O.C. (2007).Turizmoloji nedir? Turizm uzerine yapilan teorik tartismalari degerlendiren bir analiz calismasi. Cesme Ulusal Turizm Sempozyumu, 21-23 Nov. 2013. Izmir, Turkey.
  • Jafari, J. (1977). Editors’ page. Annals of Tourism Research,5, 6-11.
  • Jafari, J. (1994). La cientificación del turismo. Estudios y perspectivas en turismo, 3(1), 7-36.
  • Jafari, J. (2005). El turismo como disciplina científica, Política y sociedad., 39-56.
  • Jovicic, Z. (1988). A plea for tourismological theory and methodology. Tourism Review, 43(3), 2-5.
  • Krippendorf, J. (1999). The holiday makers: Understanding the impact of leisure and travel. London: Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Kuhn, T. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: IL, University of Chicago Press.
  • M.A. Kozak, S. Eren, & O. Cakir (2013).Tarihsel surec icinde turizm paradigmasi. Anatolia: Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 24(1), 7-22.
  • Kuhm, T. S. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Traducción: Agustín Contín). Breviarios, 213.
  • Leiper, N. (1979). The framework of tourism: Towards a definition of tourism tourist and the tourist industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 390-407.
  • Leiper, N. (1981). Towards a cohesive curriculum in tourism: The case for a distinct discipline definition.
  • Leiper, N. (1990). Tourism Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Department of Management Systems, Massey University.
  • Massé, C. (2001). Del Positivismo Disciplinario y el Racionalismo Crítico a la Epistemología Dialéctica Crítica con base en La Totalidad, como método alternativo de investigación científica. Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (11).
  • Medlik, S., & Middleton, V.T.C. (1973).The tourist product and its marketing implications. International Tourism Quarterly, 3, 28-35.
  • Nechar, M. C. (2005). Inter, multidisciplina y/o hibridación en los estudios socioculturales del turismo. Nşmero patrocinado por, 229.
  • BARRETTO, M. (2004). Produção científica na área de turismo. Um outro turismo é possível. São Paulo: Contexto.
  • Matthews, H. G. (1978). International tourism: A political and social analysis. Schenkman Books.
  • McCabe, S. (2002).The tourist experience and everyday life, in Graham Dann (ed.) The tourist as a metaphor of the social world( pp. 28-43), Wallingford: CABI.
  • Monfort, V,. Morant, A., & Ivars, J. (1996). Oferta turística, in Andrés Pedreño and Vicente Monfort (Eds.) Introducción a la Economía del Turismo en España, Civitas, Madrid.
  • Naoum, C. (2004). Uma Lectura Crítica sob a Ótica do Turismo, Actas Del Seminario de Pesquisa em Turismo do Mercosul.
  • Nash, R. (1997). Tourism in peripheral areas.Annual Hospitality Research Conference. St Catherines College, Oxford and published in the proceedings of the Conference.
  • OMT: Organización Mundial de Turismo (1991).Conferencia Internacional de Estadísticas de Turismo y Viajes. OMT, Ottawa, Canadá.
  • García, M. O. (2005). Hacia la construcción del objeto de estudio del turismo desde una perspectiva materialista critica. Pasos, 41-61.
  • Pearce, P. (1982). The social psychology of tourist behavior. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Pearce, P.L. (1993). Defining tourism as a specialism: A justification and implications.Teoros International, 1, 25-32.
  • Piercy, N. (1992). Market-led strategic change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Popper, K. R., & de Zavala, V. S. (1962). La lógica de la investigación científica., Madrid: Edición Tecnos.
  • San Martín García, J.E. (1997). Psicosociología del ocio y del turismo. Málaga: Ediciones Ajibe.
  • Smith, S.L.J. (1989). Tourism: A geographical analysis. Harlow: Longman.
  • Smith, M. (2003).issues in cultural tourism studies, London, Routledge.
  • Swarbrooke, J. (2003). Adventure tourism: The new frontier. London: Routledge.
  • Taillon, J. (2009). Understanding tourism as an academic community, study and/or discipline. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Texas A&M University, School of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas.
  • Toti,G. (1961). Tiempo libre y explotación capitalista, México: Ediciones de la Cultura Popular.
  • Tremblay, P. (1998). The economic organization of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(4), 837-859.
  • Tribe, J. (1997).The indiscipline of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3), 638-657.
  • Urry, J. (1990).the tourist gaze:Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Williams, S. (2004). General introduction. In S. William (Ed.), Tourism: critical concepts in the social sciences: the nature an structure of tourism (pp. 1-21), New York, NY: Routledge.

Arta Antonovica4 (Rey Juan Carlos University)

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 2 - 15, 24.10.2015

Abstract

References

  • AECIT (1996). Asociación Española de Expertos Científicos en Turismo, Actividad Turística Española en 1994., Castellón: AECIT.
  • Panosso, A. (2005). Filosofia do turismo: Teoria e epistemología, Brasil: Aleph.
  • Álvarez Sousa, A. (1993). Estructura Social y Consumo Turístico: los Viajes de los Españoles: Segmentación, Tendencias y Comparación con los Países Comunitarios, Doctoral Thesis (unpublished), Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
  • ANECA (2004): Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación, Libro Blanco del Título de Grado en Turismo, Madrid.
  • Baudelaire, C. (1982). The painter of modern life charles baudelaire.. A Critical Anthology, 23.
  • Belhassen, Y., & Caton, K. (2009). Advancing understandings: A linguistic approach to tourism epistemology. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(2), 335-352.
  • Bowen, D. (2001). Research on tourist satisfaction and dissatisfaction: Overcoming the limitations of a positivist and quantitative approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7(1), 31-40.
  • Britton, S. (1991). Tourism, capital, and place: towards a critical geography of tourism. Environment and planning: Society and Space, 9(4), 451-478.
  • Burkart, A.J., & Medlik, S. (1974). Tourism: Past present and future. London: Heinemann.
  • Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Gilbert, D., Wanhill, S. (1993).Tourism: Principles and practices. London: Pitman.
  • Darbellay, F., & Stock, M. (2012).Tourism as a complex interdisciplinary research object.Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 441-458.
  • Crick, M. (1998). Representations of international tourism in the social sciences: Sun, sex, sights, savings, and servility. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 307-344.
  • Darbellay, F. & Stock, M. (2012).Tourism as a complex interdisciplinary research object. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 441-458.
  • Echtner, C.M., & Jamal, T.B. (1997). The disciplinary dilemma of tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 868-883.
  • Gilbert, D.C. (1990). Conceptual issues in the meaning of tourism. In C.P. Cooper (Ed.), Progress in tourism, recreation and hospitality management (pp. 4-27), London: Belhaven.
  • Knebel, H. J. (1960). Soziologische Strukturwandlungen im modernen Tourismus. F. Enke.
  • Harvey, D. (1998). La condición de la posmodernidad. Argentina: Ediciones Amorrortu.
  • Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge.
  • Hoivik, T. and Heiberg, T. (1980).Centre-periphery tourism and self-reliance. International Social Science Journal, 3(1), 69-98.
  • Istanbullu, F.I., Cetin, G., Aslan, E.H., Izgi, M.T., &Demiroglu, O.C. (2007).Turizmoloji nedir? Turizm uzerine yapilan teorik tartismalari degerlendiren bir analiz calismasi. Cesme Ulusal Turizm Sempozyumu, 21-23 Nov. 2013. Izmir, Turkey.
  • Jafari, J. (1977). Editors’ page. Annals of Tourism Research,5, 6-11.
  • Jafari, J. (1994). La cientificación del turismo. Estudios y perspectivas en turismo, 3(1), 7-36.
  • Jafari, J. (2005). El turismo como disciplina científica, Política y sociedad., 39-56.
  • Jovicic, Z. (1988). A plea for tourismological theory and methodology. Tourism Review, 43(3), 2-5.
  • Krippendorf, J. (1999). The holiday makers: Understanding the impact of leisure and travel. London: Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Kuhn, T. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: IL, University of Chicago Press.
  • M.A. Kozak, S. Eren, & O. Cakir (2013).Tarihsel surec icinde turizm paradigmasi. Anatolia: Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 24(1), 7-22.
  • Kuhm, T. S. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Traducción: Agustín Contín). Breviarios, 213.
  • Leiper, N. (1979). The framework of tourism: Towards a definition of tourism tourist and the tourist industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 390-407.
  • Leiper, N. (1981). Towards a cohesive curriculum in tourism: The case for a distinct discipline definition.
  • Leiper, N. (1990). Tourism Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Department of Management Systems, Massey University.
  • Massé, C. (2001). Del Positivismo Disciplinario y el Racionalismo Crítico a la Epistemología Dialéctica Crítica con base en La Totalidad, como método alternativo de investigación científica. Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (11).
  • Medlik, S., & Middleton, V.T.C. (1973).The tourist product and its marketing implications. International Tourism Quarterly, 3, 28-35.
  • Nechar, M. C. (2005). Inter, multidisciplina y/o hibridación en los estudios socioculturales del turismo. Nşmero patrocinado por, 229.
  • BARRETTO, M. (2004). Produção científica na área de turismo. Um outro turismo é possível. São Paulo: Contexto.
  • Matthews, H. G. (1978). International tourism: A political and social analysis. Schenkman Books.
  • McCabe, S. (2002).The tourist experience and everyday life, in Graham Dann (ed.) The tourist as a metaphor of the social world( pp. 28-43), Wallingford: CABI.
  • Monfort, V,. Morant, A., & Ivars, J. (1996). Oferta turística, in Andrés Pedreño and Vicente Monfort (Eds.) Introducción a la Economía del Turismo en España, Civitas, Madrid.
  • Naoum, C. (2004). Uma Lectura Crítica sob a Ótica do Turismo, Actas Del Seminario de Pesquisa em Turismo do Mercosul.
  • Nash, R. (1997). Tourism in peripheral areas.Annual Hospitality Research Conference. St Catherines College, Oxford and published in the proceedings of the Conference.
  • OMT: Organización Mundial de Turismo (1991).Conferencia Internacional de Estadísticas de Turismo y Viajes. OMT, Ottawa, Canadá.
  • García, M. O. (2005). Hacia la construcción del objeto de estudio del turismo desde una perspectiva materialista critica. Pasos, 41-61.
  • Pearce, P. (1982). The social psychology of tourist behavior. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Pearce, P.L. (1993). Defining tourism as a specialism: A justification and implications.Teoros International, 1, 25-32.
  • Piercy, N. (1992). Market-led strategic change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Popper, K. R., & de Zavala, V. S. (1962). La lógica de la investigación científica., Madrid: Edición Tecnos.
  • San Martín García, J.E. (1997). Psicosociología del ocio y del turismo. Málaga: Ediciones Ajibe.
  • Smith, S.L.J. (1989). Tourism: A geographical analysis. Harlow: Longman.
  • Smith, M. (2003).issues in cultural tourism studies, London, Routledge.
  • Swarbrooke, J. (2003). Adventure tourism: The new frontier. London: Routledge.
  • Taillon, J. (2009). Understanding tourism as an academic community, study and/or discipline. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Texas A&M University, School of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas.
  • Toti,G. (1961). Tiempo libre y explotación capitalista, México: Ediciones de la Cultura Popular.
  • Tremblay, P. (1998). The economic organization of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(4), 837-859.
  • Tribe, J. (1997).The indiscipline of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3), 638-657.
  • Urry, J. (1990).the tourist gaze:Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Williams, S. (2004). General introduction. In S. William (Ed.), Tourism: critical concepts in the social sciences: the nature an structure of tourism (pp. 1-21), New York, NY: Routledge.
There are 56 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Javier De Esteban

Gurel Cetin

Arta Antonovica

Publication Date October 24, 2015
Submission Date October 21, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 1 Issue: 1

Cite

APA De Esteban, J., Cetin, G., & Antonovica, A. (2015). Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection. Journal of Tourismology, 1(1), 2-15.
AMA De Esteban J, Cetin G, Antonovica A. Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection. Journal of Tourismology. October 2015;1(1):2-15.
Chicago De Esteban, Javier, Gurel Cetin, and Arta Antonovica. “Theory of Knowledge of Tourism: A Sociological and Epistemological Reflection”. Journal of Tourismology 1, no. 1 (October 2015): 2-15.
EndNote De Esteban J, Cetin G, Antonovica A (October 1, 2015) Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection. Journal of Tourismology 1 1 2–15.
IEEE J. De Esteban, G. Cetin, and A. Antonovica, “Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection”, Journal of Tourismology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–15, 2015.
ISNAD De Esteban, Javier et al. “Theory of Knowledge of Tourism: A Sociological and Epistemological Reflection”. Journal of Tourismology 1/1 (October 2015), 2-15.
JAMA De Esteban J, Cetin G, Antonovica A. Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection. Journal of Tourismology. 2015;1:2–15.
MLA De Esteban, Javier et al. “Theory of Knowledge of Tourism: A Sociological and Epistemological Reflection”. Journal of Tourismology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2015, pp. 2-15.
Vancouver De Esteban J, Cetin G, Antonovica A. Theory of knowledge of tourism: A sociological and epistemological reflection. Journal of Tourismology. 2015;1(1):2-15.